Build-conflict on lua50 as the lua binding autofoo stuff is buggy as hell.

[pkg-rrdtool.git] / doc / bin_dec_hex.1

diff --git a/doc/bin_dec_hex.1 b/doc/bin_dec_hex.1
index a9b770ce52dbfcf56af14d76b7eb22e404c6477f..f6aef5be917be0ddf121fa7591e19d043bacbc20 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/bin_dec_hex.1
+++ b/doc/bin_dec_hex.1
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-.\" Automatically generated by Pod::Man v1.37, Pod::Parser v1.32
+.\" Automatically generated by Pod::Man v1.37, Pod::Parser v1.14
 .\"
 .\" Standard preamble:
 .\" ========================================================================
@@ -25,11 +25,11 @@
 ..
 .\" Set up some character translations and predefined strings.  \*(-- will
 .\" give an unbreakable dash, \*(PI will give pi, \*(L" will give a left
-.\" double quote, and \*(R" will give a right double quote.  \*(C+ will
-.\" give a nicer C++.  Capital omega is used to do unbreakable dashes and
-.\" therefore won't be available.  \*(C` and \*(C' expand to `' in nroff,
-.\" nothing in troff, for use with C<>.
-.tr \(*W-
+.\" double quote, and \*(R" will give a right double quote.  | will give a
+.\" real vertical bar.  \*(C+ will give a nicer C++.  Capital omega is used to
+.\" do unbreakable dashes and therefore won't be available.  \*(C` and \*(C'
+.\" expand to `' in nroff, nothing in troff, for use with C<>.
+.tr \(*W-|\(bv\*(Tr
 .ds C+ C\v'-.1v'\h'-1p'\s-2+\h'-1p'+\s0\v'.1v'\h'-1p'
 .ie n \{\
 .    ds -- \(*W-
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
 .\" ========================================================================
 .\"
 .IX Title "BIN_DEC_HEX 1"
-.TH BIN_DEC_HEX 1 "2008-03-15" "1.3rc4" "rrdtool"
+.TH BIN_DEC_HEX 1 "2009-02-21" "1.3.99909060808" "rrdtool"
 .SH "NAME"
 bin_dec_hex \- How to use binary, decimal, and hexadecimal notation.
 .SH "DESCRIPTION"
@@ -300,7 +300,8 @@ you're writing in. Some of the prefixes are \*(L"0x\*(R" for C, \*(L"$\*(R" for
 Pascal, \*(L"#\*(R" for \s-1HTML\s0.  It is common to assume that if a number starts
 with a zero, it is octal. It does not matter what is used as long as
 you know what it is. I will use \*(L"0x\*(R" for hexadecimal, \*(L"%\*(R" for binary
-and \*(L"0\*(R" for octal.  The following numbers are all the same, just their represenatation (base) is different: 021 0x11 17 \f(CW%00010001\fR
+and \*(L"0\*(R" for octal.  The following numbers are all the same, just their
+representation (base) is different: 021 0x11 17 \f(CW%00010001\fR
 .PP
 To do arithmetics and conversions you need to understand one more thing.
 It is something you already know but perhaps you do not \*(L"see\*(R" it yet:
@@ -408,7 +409,7 @@ is therefore \*(L"0\*(R" and we now have 0xA0??.
 (which is just plain 16) four times and write down \*(L"4\*(R" to get 0xA04?.
 Subtract 64 from 69 (69 \- 4*16) and the last digit is 5 \-\-> 0xA045.
 .PP
-The other method builds ub the number from the right. Let's try 41'029
+The other method builds up the number from the right. Let's try 41'029
 again.  Divide by 16 and do not use fractions (only whole numbers).
 .PP
 .Vb 4
@@ -532,4 +533,4 @@ other people by pointing them to this document when they are asking
 basic questions. They will not only get their answer, but at the same
 time learn a whole lot more.
 .PP
-Alex van den Bogaerdt  <alex@ergens.op.het.net>
+Alex van den Bogaerdt  <alex@vandenbogaerdt.nl>