From eafb45265bb9fcbee3cc03b451da7e17db9e6be7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:07:05 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] do_one_ref(): null_sha1 check is not about broken ref f8948e2 (remote prune: warn dangling symrefs, 2009-02-08) introduced a more dangerous variant of for_each_ref() family that skips the check for dangling refs, but it also made another unrelated check optional by mistake. The check to see if a ref points at 0{40} is not about brokenness, but is about a possible future plan to represent a deleted ref by writing 40 "0" in a loose ref when there is a stale version of the same ref already in .git/packed-refs, so that we can implement deletion of a ref without having to rewrite the packed refs file excluding the ref being deleted. This check has to live outside of the conditional. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- refs.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c index bb0762ee2..3da3c8cef 100644 --- a/refs.c +++ b/refs.c @@ -531,9 +531,10 @@ static int do_one_ref(const char *base, each_ref_fn fn, int trim, { if (strncmp(base, entry->name, trim)) return 0; + /* Is this a "negative ref" that represents a deleted ref? */ + if (is_null_sha1(entry->sha1)) + return 0; if (!(flags & DO_FOR_EACH_INCLUDE_BROKEN)) { - if (is_null_sha1(entry->sha1)) - return 0; if (!has_sha1_file(entry->sha1)) { error("%s does not point to a valid object!", entry->name); return 0; -- 2.30.2