From aa0bcf962a6657226b729f263ca4b8e768ed6d5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Nieder Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 03:15:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] test: simplify return value of test_run_ As v0.99.5~24^2~4 (Trapping exit in tests, using return for errors, 2005-08-10) explains, callers to test_run_ (such as test_expect_code) used to check the result from eval and the return value separately so tests that fail early could be distinguished from tests that completed normally with successful (nonzero) status. Eventually tests that succeed with nonzero status were phased out (see v1.7.4-rc0~65^2~19, 2010-10-03 and especially v1.5.5-rc0~271, 2008-02-01) but the weird two-return-value calling convention lives on. Let's get rid of it. The new rule: test_run_ succeeds (returns 0) if and only if the test succeeded. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder Acked-by: Jeff King Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- t/test-lib.sh | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh index df25f1792..b16a9b98f 100644 --- a/t/test-lib.sh +++ b/t/test-lib.sh @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ test_run_ () { if test "$verbose" = "t" && test -n "$HARNESS_ACTIVE"; then echo "" fi - return 0 + return "$eval_ret" } test_skip () { @@ -502,8 +502,7 @@ test_expect_failure () { if ! test_skip "$@" then say >&3 "checking known breakage: $2" - test_run_ "$2" expecting_failure - if [ "$?" = 0 -a "$eval_ret" = 0 ] + if test_run_ "$2" expecting_failure then test_known_broken_ok_ "$1" else @@ -521,8 +520,7 @@ test_expect_success () { if ! test_skip "$@" then say >&3 "expecting success: $2" - test_run_ "$2" - if [ "$?" = 0 -a "$eval_ret" = 0 ] + if test_run_ "$2" then test_ok_ "$1" else -- 2.30.2