From 81eb417ad423ef7e8d088d517f89d3bda92f9c06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:54:19 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] user-manual: failed push to public repository More details on the case of a failed push to a public (non-shared) repository. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields --- Documentation/user-manual.txt | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt index 8355cce29..547c9364b 100644 --- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt +++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt @@ -1929,15 +1929,9 @@ or just $ git push ssh://yourserver.com/~you/proj.git master ------------------------------------------------- -As with git-fetch, git-push will complain if this does not result in -a <>. Normally this is a sign of -something wrong. However, if you are sure you know what you're -doing, you may force git-push to perform the update anyway by -proceeding the branch name by a plus sign: - -------------------------------------------------- -$ git push ssh://yourserver.com/~you/proj.git +master -------------------------------------------------- +As with git-fetch, git-push will complain if this does not result in a +<>; see the following section for details on +handling this case. Note that the target of a "push" is normally a <> repository. You can also push to a @@ -1965,6 +1959,52 @@ See the explanations of the remote..url, branch..remote, and remote..push options in gitlink:git-config[1] for details. +[[forcing-push]] +What to do when a push fails +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +If a push would not result in a <> of the +remote branch, then it will fail with an error like: + +------------------------------------------------- +error: remote 'refs/heads/master' is not an ancestor of + local 'refs/heads/master'. + Maybe you are not up-to-date and need to pull first? +error: failed to push to 'ssh://yourserver.com/~you/proj.git' +------------------------------------------------- + +This can happen, for example, if you: + + - use `git reset --hard` to remove already-published commits, or + - use `git commit --amend` to replace already-published commits + (as in <>), or + - use `git rebase` to rebase any already-published commits (as + in <>). + +You may force git-push to perform the update anyway by preceding the +branch name with a plus sign: + +------------------------------------------------- +$ git push ssh://yourserver.com/~you/proj.git +master +------------------------------------------------- + +Normally whenever a branch head in a public repository is modified, it +is modified to point to a descendent of the commit that it pointed to +before. By forcing a push in this situation, you break that convention. +(See <>.) + +Nevertheless, this is a common practice for people that need a simple +way to publish a work-in-progress patch series, and it is an acceptable +compromise as long as you warn other developers that this is how you +intend to manage the branch. + +It's also possible for a push to fail in this way when other people have +the right to push to the same repository. In that case, the correct +solution is to retry the push after first updating your work by either a +pull or a fetch followed by a rebase; see the +<> and +link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users] for more. + [[setting-up-a-shared-repository]] Setting up a shared repository ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- 2.30.2