![[tokkee]](http://tokkee.org/images/avatar.png){kind=avatar}
git-gui: Use vi-like keys in merge dialog
Since we support vi-like keys for scrolling in other UI contexts
we can easily do so here too. Tk's handy little `event generate'
makes this a lot easier than I thought it would be. We may want
to go back and fix some of the other vi-like bindings to redirect
to the arrow and pageup/pagedown keys, rather than running the
view changes directly.
I've bound 'v' to visualize, as this is a somewhat common thing
to want to do in the merge dialog. Control (or Command) Return
is also bound to start the merge, much as it is bound in the
main window to activate the commit.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Since we support vi-like keys for scrolling in other UI contexts
we can easily do so here too. Tk's handy little `event generate'
makes this a lot easier than I thought it would be. We may want
to go back and fix some of the other vi-like bindings to redirect
to the arrow and pageup/pagedown keys, rather than running the
view changes directly.
I've bound 'v' to visualize, as this is a somewhat common thing
to want to do in the merge dialog. Control (or Command) Return
is also bound to start the merge, much as it is bound in the
main window to activate the commit.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Include commit id/subject in merge choices
When merging branches using our local merge feature it can be
handy to know the first few digits of the commit the ref points
at as well as the short description of the branch name.
Unfortunately I'm unable to use three listboxes in a row, as Tcl
freaks out and refuses to let me have a selection in more than
one of them at any given point in time. So instead we use a
fixed width font in the existing listbox and organize the data
into three columns. Not nearly as nice looking, but users can
continue to use the listbox's features.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When merging branches using our local merge feature it can be
handy to know the first few digits of the commit the ref points
at as well as the short description of the branch name.
Unfortunately I'm unable to use three listboxes in a row, as Tcl
freaks out and refuses to let me have a selection in more than
one of them at any given point in time. So instead we use a
fixed width font in the existing listbox and organize the data
into three columns. Not nearly as nice looking, but users can
continue to use the listbox's features.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Show all possible branches for merge
Johannes Sixt pointed out that git-gui was randomly selecting
which branch (or tag!) it will show in the merge dialog when
more than one ref points at the same commit. This can be a
problem for the user if they want to merge a branch, but the
ref that git-gui selected to display was actually a tag that
points at the commit at the tip of that branch. Since the
user is looking for the branch, and not the tag, its confusing
to not find it, and worse, merging the tag causes git-merge to
generate a different message than if the branch was selected.
While I am in here and am messing around I have changed the
for-each-ref usage to take advantage of its --tcl formatting,
and to fetch the subject line of the commit (or tag) we are
looking at. This way we could present the subject line in the
UI to the user, given them an even better chance to select
the correct branch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Johannes Sixt pointed out that git-gui was randomly selecting
which branch (or tag!) it will show in the merge dialog when
more than one ref points at the same commit. This can be a
problem for the user if they want to merge a branch, but the
ref that git-gui selected to display was actually a tag that
points at the commit at the tip of that branch. Since the
user is looking for the branch, and not the tag, its confusing
to not find it, and worse, merging the tag causes git-merge to
generate a different message than if the branch was selected.
While I am in here and am messing around I have changed the
for-each-ref usage to take advantage of its --tcl formatting,
and to fetch the subject line of the commit (or tag) we are
looking at. This way we could present the subject line in the
UI to the user, given them an even better chance to select
the correct branch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Move merge support into a namespace
Like the console procs I have moved the code related to merge
support into their own namespace, so that they are isolated
from the rest of the world.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Like the console procs I have moved the code related to merge
support into their own namespace, so that they are isolated
from the rest of the world.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Allow vi keys to scroll the diff/blame regions
Users who are used to vi and recent versions of gitk may want
to scroll the diff region using vi style keybindings. Since
these aren't bound to anything else and that widget does not
accept focus for data input, we can easily support that too.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Users who are used to vi and recent versions of gitk may want
to scroll the diff region using vi style keybindings. Since
these aren't bound to anything else and that widget does not
accept focus for data input, we can easily support that too.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Move console procs into their own namespace
To help modularize git-gui better I'm isolating the code and
variables required to handle our little console windows into
their own namespace. This way we can say console::new rather
than new_console, and the hidden internal procs to create the
window and read data from our filehandle are off in their own
private little land, where most users don't see them.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To help modularize git-gui better I'm isolating the code and
variables required to handle our little console windows into
their own namespace. This way we can say console::new rather
than new_console, and the hidden internal procs to create the
window and read data from our filehandle are off in their own
private little land, where most users don't see them.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Refactor into multiple files to save my sanity
I'm finding it difficult to work with a 6,000+ line Tcl script
and not go insane while looking for a particular block of code.
Since most of the program is organized into different units of
functionality and not all users will need all units immediately
on startup we can improve things by splitting procs out into
multiple files and let auto_load handle things for us.
This should help not only to better organize the source, but
it may also improve startup times for some users as the Tcl
parser does not need to read as much script before it can show
the UI. In many cases the user can avoid reading at least half
of git-gui now.
Unfortunately we now need a library directory in our runtime
location. This is currently assumed to be $(sharedir)/git-gui/lib
and its expected that the Makefile invoker will setup some sort of
reasonable sharedir value for us, or let us assume its going to be
$(gitexecdir)/../share.
We now also require a tclsh (in TCL_PATH) to just run the Makefile,
as we use tclsh to generate the tclIndex for our lib directory. I'm
hoping this is not an unncessary burden on end-users who are building
from source.
I haven't really made any functionality changes here, this is just a
huge migration of code from one file to many smaller files. All of
the new changes are to setup the library path and install the library
files.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I'm finding it difficult to work with a 6,000+ line Tcl script
and not go insane while looking for a particular block of code.
Since most of the program is organized into different units of
functionality and not all users will need all units immediately
on startup we can improve things by splitting procs out into
multiple files and let auto_load handle things for us.
This should help not only to better organize the source, but
it may also improve startup times for some users as the Tcl
parser does not need to read as much script before it can show
the UI. In many cases the user can avoid reading at least half
of git-gui now.
Unfortunately we now need a library directory in our runtime
location. This is currently assumed to be $(sharedir)/git-gui/lib
and its expected that the Makefile invoker will setup some sort of
reasonable sharedir value for us, or let us assume its going to be
$(gitexecdir)/../share.
We now also require a tclsh (in TCL_PATH) to just run the Makefile,
as we use tclsh to generate the tclIndex for our lib directory. I'm
hoping this is not an unncessary burden on end-users who are building
from source.
I haven't really made any functionality changes here, this is just a
huge migration of code from one file to many smaller files. All of
the new changes are to setup the library path and install the library
files.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Track our own embedded values and rebuild when they change
Like core-Git we now track the values that we embed into our shell
script wrapper, and we "recompile" that wrapper if they are changed.
This concept was lifted from git.git's Makefile, where a similar
thing was done by Eygene Ryabinkin. Too bad it wasn't just done
here in git-gui from the beginning, as the git.git Makefile support
for GIT-GUI-VARS was really just because git-gui doesn't do it on
its own.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Like core-Git we now track the values that we embed into our shell
script wrapper, and we "recompile" that wrapper if they are changed.
This concept was lifted from git.git's Makefile, where a similar
thing was done by Eygene Ryabinkin. Too bad it wasn't just done
here in git-gui from the beginning, as the git.git Makefile support
for GIT-GUI-VARS was really just because git-gui doesn't do it on
its own.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Refactor to use our git proc more often
Whenever we want to execute a git subcommand from the plumbing
layer (and on rare occasion, the more porcelain-ish layer) we
tend to use our proc wrapper, just to make the code slightly
cleaner at the call sites. I wasn't doing that in a couple of
places, so this is a simple cleanup to correct that.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Whenever we want to execute a git subcommand from the plumbing
layer (and on rare occasion, the more porcelain-ish layer) we
tend to use our proc wrapper, just to make the code slightly
cleaner at the call sites. I wasn't doing that in a couple of
places, so this is a simple cleanup to correct that.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Use option database defaults to set the font
Rather than passing "-font font_ui" to every widget that we
create we can instead reconfigure the option database for
all widget classes to use our font_ui as the default widget
font. This way Tk will automatically setup their defaults
for us, and we can reduce the size of the application.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Rather than passing "-font font_ui" to every widget that we
create we can instead reconfigure the option database for
all widget classes to use our font_ui as the default widget
font. This way Tk will automatically setup their defaults
for us, and we can reduce the size of the application.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Cleanup common font handling for font_ui
An earlier change tossed these optionMenu font configurations
all over the code, when really we can just rename the proc to
a hidden internal name and provide our own wrapper to install
the font configuration we really want.
We also don't need to set these option database entries in all
of the procedures that open dialogs; instead we should just set
one time, them after we have the font configuration ready for use.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
An earlier change tossed these optionMenu font configurations
all over the code, when really we can just rename the proc to
a hidden internal name and provide our own wrapper to install
the font configuration we really want.
We also don't need to set these option database entries in all
of the procedures that open dialogs; instead we should just set
one time, them after we have the font configuration ready for use.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Correct line wrapping for too many branch message
Since Tk automatically wraps lines for us in tk_messageBox
widgets we don't need to try to wrap them ourselves. Its
actually worse that we linewrapped this here in the script,
as not all fonts will render this dialog nicely.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Since Tk automatically wraps lines for us in tk_messageBox
widgets we don't need to try to wrap them ourselves. Its
actually worse that we linewrapped this here in the script,
as not all fonts will render this dialog nicely.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Warn users before making an octopus merge
A coworker who was new to git-gui recently tried to make an octopus
merge when he did not quite mean to. Unfortunately in his case the
branches had file level conflicts and failed to merge with the octopus
strategy, and he didn't quite know why this happened. Since most users
really don't want to perform an octopus merge this additional safety
valve in front of the merge process is a good thing.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
A coworker who was new to git-gui recently tried to make an octopus
merge when he did not quite mean to. Unfortunately in his case the
branches had file level conflicts and failed to merge with the octopus
strategy, and he didn't quite know why this happened. Since most users
really don't want to perform an octopus merge this additional safety
valve in front of the merge process is a good thing.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Include the subject in the status bar after commit
Now that the command line git-commit has made displaying
the subject (first line) of the newly created commit popular
we can easily do the same thing here in git-gui, without the
ugly part of forking off a child process to obtain that first
line.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that the command line git-commit has made displaying
the subject (first line) of the newly created commit popular
we can easily do the same thing here in git-gui, without the
ugly part of forking off a child process to obtain that first
line.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Merge branch 'maint'
* maint:
git-gui: Allow spaces in path to 'wish'
* maint:
git-gui: Allow spaces in path to 'wish'
git-gui: Allow spaces in path to 'wish'
If the path of our wish executable that are running under
contains spaces we need to make sure they are escaped in
a proper Tcl list, otherwise we are unable to start gitk.
Reported by Randal L. Schwartz on #git.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the path of our wish executable that are running under
contains spaces we need to make sure they are escaped in
a proper Tcl list, otherwise we are unable to start gitk.
Reported by Randal L. Schwartz on #git.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Correctly handle UTF-8 encoded commit messages
Uwe Kleine-König discovered git-gui mangled his surname and did
not send the proper UTF-8 byte sequence to git-commit-tree when
his name appeared in the commit message (e.g. Signed-Off-By line).
Turns out this was related to other trouble that I had in the past
with trying to use "fconfigure $fd -encoding $enc" to select the
stream encoding and let Tcl's IO engine do all of the encoding work
for us. Other parts of git-gui were just always setting the file
channels to "-encoding binary" and then performing the encoding
work themselves using "encoding convertfrom" and "convertto", as
that was the only way I could make UTF-8 filenames work properly.
I found this same bug in the amend code path, and in the blame
display. So its fixed in all three locations (commit creation,
reloading message for amend, viewing message in blame).
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Uwe Kleine-König discovered git-gui mangled his surname and did
not send the proper UTF-8 byte sequence to git-commit-tree when
his name appeared in the commit message (e.g. Signed-Off-By line).
Turns out this was related to other trouble that I had in the past
with trying to use "fconfigure $fd -encoding $enc" to select the
stream encoding and let Tcl's IO engine do all of the encoding work
for us. Other parts of git-gui were just always setting the file
channels to "-encoding binary" and then performing the encoding
work themselves using "encoding convertfrom" and "convertto", as
that was the only way I could make UTF-8 filenames work properly.
I found this same bug in the amend code path, and in the blame
display. So its fixed in all three locations (commit creation,
reloading message for amend, viewing message in blame).
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Honor TCLTK_PATH if supplied
Mimick what we do for gitk. Since you do have a source file,
git-gui.sh, which is separate from the target, it should be much
easier in git-gui's Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Mimick what we do for gitk. Since you do have a source file,
git-gui.sh, which is separate from the target, it should be much
easier in git-gui's Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Revert "Allow wish interpreter to be defined with TCLTK_PATH"
This reverts commit e2a1bc67d321a0c03737179f331c39a52e7049d7.
Junio rightly pointed out this patch doesn't handle the
`make install` target very well:
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:
> You should never generate new files in the source tree from
> 'install' target. Otherwise, the usual pattern of "make" as
> yourself and then "make install" as root would not work from a
> "root-to-nobody-squashing" NFS mounted source tree to local
> filesystem. You should know better than accepting such a patch.
This reverts commit e2a1bc67d321a0c03737179f331c39a52e7049d7.
Junio rightly pointed out this patch doesn't handle the
`make install` target very well:
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:
> You should never generate new files in the source tree from
> 'install' target. Otherwise, the usual pattern of "make" as
> yourself and then "make install" as root would not work from a
> "root-to-nobody-squashing" NFS mounted source tree to local
> filesystem. You should know better than accepting such a patch.
git-gui: Display the directory basename in the title
By showing the basename of the directory very early in the
title bar I can more easily locate a particular git-gui
session when I have 8 open at once and my Windows taskbar
is overflowing with items.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
By showing the basename of the directory very early in the
title bar I can more easily locate a particular git-gui
session when I have 8 open at once and my Windows taskbar
is overflowing with items.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Merge branch 'er/ui'
* er/ui:
Always bind the return key to the default button
Do not break git-gui messages into multiple lines.
Improve look-and-feel of the git-gui tool.
Teach git-gui to use the user-defined UI font everywhere.
Allow wish interpreter to be defined with TCLTK_PATH
* er/ui:
Always bind the return key to the default button
Do not break git-gui messages into multiple lines.
Improve look-and-feel of the git-gui tool.
Teach git-gui to use the user-defined UI font everywhere.
Allow wish interpreter to be defined with TCLTK_PATH
git-gui: Brown paper bag fix division by 0 in blame
If we generate a blame status string before we have obtained
any annotation data at all from the input file, or if the input
file is empty, our total_lines will be 0. This causes a division
by 0 error when we blindly divide by the 0 to compute the total
percentage of lines loaded. Instead we should report 0% done.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If we generate a blame status string before we have obtained
any annotation data at all from the input file, or if the input
file is empty, our total_lines will be 0. This causes a division
by 0 error when we blindly divide by the 0 to compute the total
percentage of lines loaded. Instead we should report 0% done.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Always bind the return key to the default button
If a dialog/window has a default button registered not every
platform associates the return key with that button, but all
users do. We have to register the binding of the return key
ourselves to make sure the user's expectations of pressing
return will activate the default button are met.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If a dialog/window has a default button registered not every
platform associates the return key with that button, but all
users do. We have to register the binding of the return key
ourselves to make sure the user's expectations of pressing
return will activate the default button are met.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Do not break git-gui messages into multiple lines.
Many git-gui messages were broken into a multiple lines to make
good paragraph width. Unfortunately in reality it breaks the paragraph
width completely, because the dialog window width does not coincide
with the paragraph width created by the current font.
Tcl/Tk's standard dialog boxes are breaking the long lines
automatically, so it is better to make long lines and let the
interpreter do the job.
Signed-off-by: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-git@codelabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Many git-gui messages were broken into a multiple lines to make
good paragraph width. Unfortunately in reality it breaks the paragraph
width completely, because the dialog window width does not coincide
with the paragraph width created by the current font.
Tcl/Tk's standard dialog boxes are breaking the long lines
automatically, so it is better to make long lines and let the
interpreter do the job.
Signed-off-by: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-git@codelabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Improve look-and-feel of the git-gui tool.
Made the default buttons on the dialog active and focused upon the
dialog appearence.
Bound 'Escape' and 'Return' keys to the dialog dismissal where it
was appropriate: mainly for dialogs with only one button and no
editable fields, but on console output dialogs as well.
Signed-off-by: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-git@codelabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Made the default buttons on the dialog active and focused upon the
dialog appearence.
Bound 'Escape' and 'Return' keys to the dialog dismissal where it
was appropriate: mainly for dialogs with only one button and no
editable fields, but on console output dialogs as well.
Signed-off-by: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-git@codelabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Teach git-gui to use the user-defined UI font everywhere.
Some parts of git-gui were not respecting the default GUI font.
Most of them were catched and fixed.
Signed-off-by: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-git@codelabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Some parts of git-gui were not respecting the default GUI font.
Most of them were catched and fixed.
Signed-off-by: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-git@codelabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Allow wish interpreter to be defined with TCLTK_PATH
Makefile got one external option:
- TCLTK_PATH: the path to the Tcl/Tk interpreter.
Users (or build wrappers) may set this variable to the
location of the wish executable.
Signed-off-by: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-git@codelabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Makefile got one external option:
- TCLTK_PATH: the path to the Tcl/Tk interpreter.
Users (or build wrappers) may set this variable to the
location of the wish executable.
Signed-off-by: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-git@codelabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Merge branch 'maint'
* maint:
git-gui: Allow 'git gui version' outside of a repository
git-gui: Revert "git-gui: Display all authors of git-gui."
git-gui: Revert "Don't modify CREDITS-FILE if it hasn't changed."
git-gui: Allow committing empty merges
* maint:
git-gui: Allow 'git gui version' outside of a repository
git-gui: Revert "git-gui: Display all authors of git-gui."
git-gui: Revert "Don't modify CREDITS-FILE if it hasn't changed."
git-gui: Allow committing empty merges
git-gui: Allow 'git gui version' outside of a repository
I got a little surprise one day when I tried to run 'git gui version'
outside of a Git repository to determine what version of git-gui was
installed on that system. Turns out we were doing the repository
check long before we got around to command line argument handling.
We now look to see if the only argument we have been given is
'version' or '--version', and if so, print out the version and
exit immediately; long before we consider looking at the Git
version or working directory. This way users can still get to
the git-gui version number even if Git's version cannot be read.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I got a little surprise one day when I tried to run 'git gui version'
outside of a Git repository to determine what version of git-gui was
installed on that system. Turns out we were doing the repository
check long before we got around to command line argument handling.
We now look to see if the only argument we have been given is
'version' or '--version', and if so, print out the version and
exit immediately; long before we consider looking at the Git
version or working directory. This way users can still get to
the git-gui version number even if Git's version cannot be read.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Revert "git-gui: Display all authors of git-gui."
This reverts commit 871f4c97ad7e021d1a0a98c80c5da77fcf70e4af.
Too many users have complained about the credits generator in
git-gui, so I'm backing the entire thing out. This revert will
finish that series.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This reverts commit 871f4c97ad7e021d1a0a98c80c5da77fcf70e4af.
Too many users have complained about the credits generator in
git-gui, so I'm backing the entire thing out. This revert will
finish that series.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Revert "Don't modify CREDITS-FILE if it hasn't changed."
This reverts commit 92446aba47b0e0db28f7b858ea387efcca30ab44.
Too many users have complained about the credits generator in
git-gui, so I'm backing the entire thing out.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This reverts commit 92446aba47b0e0db28f7b858ea387efcca30ab44.
Too many users have complained about the credits generator in
git-gui, so I'm backing the entire thing out.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Allow committing empty merges
Johannes Sixt noticed that git-gui would not let the user commit
a merge created by `git merge -s ours` as the ours strategy does
not alter the tree (that is HEAD^1^{tree} = HEAD^{tree} after the
merge). The same issue arises from amending such a merge commit.
We now permit an empty commit (no changed files) if we are doing
a merge commit. Core Git does this with its command line based
git-commit tool, so it makes sense for the GUI to do the same.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Johannes Sixt noticed that git-gui would not let the user commit
a merge created by `git merge -s ours` as the ours strategy does
not alter the tree (that is HEAD^1^{tree} = HEAD^{tree} after the
merge). The same issue arises from amending such a merge commit.
We now permit an empty commit (no changed files) if we are doing
a merge commit. Core Git does this with its command line based
git-commit tool, so it makes sense for the GUI to do the same.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Support of "make -s" in: do not output anything of the build itself
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Make 'make' quieter by default
To fit nicely into the output of the git.git project's own quieter
Makefile, we want to make the git-gui Makefile nice and quiet too.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To fit nicely into the output of the git.git project's own quieter
Makefile, we want to make the git-gui Makefile nice and quiet too.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Remove unnecessary /dev/null redirection.
Git 1.5.0 and later no longer output useless messages to standard
error when making the initial (or what looks to be) commit of a
repository. Since /dev/null does not exist on Windows in the
MinGW environment we can't redirect there anyway. Since Git
does not output anymore, I'm removing the redirection.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Git 1.5.0 and later no longer output useless messages to standard
error when making the initial (or what looks to be) commit of a
repository. Since /dev/null does not exist on Windows in the
MinGW environment we can't redirect there anyway. Since Git
does not output anymore, I'm removing the redirection.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Don't create empty (same tree as parent) commits.
Mark Levedahl noticed that git-gui will let you create an empty
normal (non-merge) commit if the file state in the index is out
of whack. The case Mark was looking at was with the new autoCRLF
feature in git enabled and is actually somewhat difficult to create.
I found a different way to create an empty commit: turn on the
Trust File Modifications flag, touch a file, rescan, then move
the file into the "Changes To Be Committed" list without looking
at the file's diff. This makes git-gui think there are files
staged for commit, yet the update-index call did nothing other
than refresh the stat information for the affected file. In
this case git-gui allowed the user to make a commit that did
not actually change anything in the repository.
Creating empty commits is usually a pointless operation; rarely
does it record useful information. More often than not an empty
commit is actually an indication that the user did not properly
update their index prior to commit. We should help the user out
by detecting this possible mistake and guiding them through it,
rather than blindly recording it.
After we get the new tree name back from write-tree we compare
it to the parent commit's tree; if they are the same string and
this is a normal (non-merge, non-amend) commit then something
fishy is going on. The user is making an empty commit, but they
most likely don't want to do that. We now pop an informational
dialog and start a rescan, aborting the commit.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Mark Levedahl noticed that git-gui will let you create an empty
normal (non-merge) commit if the file state in the index is out
of whack. The case Mark was looking at was with the new autoCRLF
feature in git enabled and is actually somewhat difficult to create.
I found a different way to create an empty commit: turn on the
Trust File Modifications flag, touch a file, rescan, then move
the file into the "Changes To Be Committed" list without looking
at the file's diff. This makes git-gui think there are files
staged for commit, yet the update-index call did nothing other
than refresh the stat information for the affected file. In
this case git-gui allowed the user to make a commit that did
not actually change anything in the repository.
Creating empty commits is usually a pointless operation; rarely
does it record useful information. More often than not an empty
commit is actually an indication that the user did not properly
update their index prior to commit. We should help the user out
by detecting this possible mistake and guiding them through it,
rather than blindly recording it.
After we get the new tree name back from write-tree we compare
it to the parent commit's tree; if they are the same string and
this is a normal (non-merge, non-amend) commit then something
fishy is going on. The user is making an empty commit, but they
most likely don't want to do that. We now pop an informational
dialog and start a rescan, aborting the commit.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Add Reset to the Branch menu.
cehteh on #git noticed that there was no way to perform a reset --hard
from within git-gui. When I pointed out this was Merge->Abort Merge
cehteh said this is not very understandable, and that most users would
never guess to try that option unless they were actually in a merge.
So Branch->Reset is now also a way to cause a reset --hard from within
the UI. Right now the confirmation dialog is the same as the one used
in Merge->Abort Merge.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
cehteh on #git noticed that there was no way to perform a reset --hard
from within git-gui. When I pointed out this was Merge->Abort Merge
cehteh said this is not very understandable, and that most users would
never guess to try that option unless they were actually in a merge.
So Branch->Reset is now also a way to cause a reset --hard from within
the UI. Right now the confirmation dialog is the same as the one used
in Merge->Abort Merge.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Relocate the menu/transport menu code.
This code doesn't belong down in the main window UI creation,
its really part of the menu system and probably should be
located with it. I'm moving it because I could not find
the code when I was looking for it earlier today, as it was
not where I expected it to be found.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This code doesn't belong down in the main window UI creation,
its really part of the menu system and probably should be
located with it. I'm moving it because I could not find
the code when I was looking for it earlier today, as it was
not where I expected it to be found.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Don't modify CREDITS-FILE if it hasn't changed.
We should always avoid rewriting a built file during `make install`
if nothing has changed since `make all`. This is to help support
the typical installation process of compiling a package as yourself,
then installing it as root.
Forcing CREDITS-FILE to be always be rebuilt in the Makefile means
that CREDITS-GEN needs to check for a change and only update
CREDITS-FILE if the file content actually differs. After all,
content is king in Git.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We should always avoid rewriting a built file during `make install`
if nothing has changed since `make all`. This is to help support
the typical installation process of compiling a package as yourself,
then installing it as root.
Forcing CREDITS-FILE to be always be rebuilt in the Makefile means
that CREDITS-GEN needs to check for a change and only update
CREDITS-FILE if the file content actually differs. After all,
content is king in Git.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Don't crash in citool mode on initial commit.
Attempting to use `git citool` to create an initial commit caused
git-gui to crash with a Tcl error as it tried to add the newly
born branch to the non-existant branch menu. Moving this code
to after the normal commit cleanup logic resolves the issue, as
we only have a branch menu if we are not in singlecommit mode.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Attempting to use `git citool` to create an initial commit caused
git-gui to crash with a Tcl error as it tried to add the newly
born branch to the non-existant branch menu. Moving this code
to after the normal commit cleanup logic resolves the issue, as
we only have a branch menu if we are not in singlecommit mode.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Remove TODO list.
I'm apparently not very good at keeping my own TODO file current.
I its also somewhat strange to keep the TODO list as part of the
software branch, as its meta-information that is not directly
related to the code. I'm pulling the TODO list from git-gui and
moving it into a seperate branch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I'm apparently not very good at keeping my own TODO file current.
I its also somewhat strange to keep the TODO list as part of the
software branch, as its meta-information that is not directly
related to the code. I'm pulling the TODO list from git-gui and
moving it into a seperate branch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Include browser in our usage message.
Now that the 'browser' subcommand can be used to startup the tree
browser, it should be listed as a possible subcommand option in
our usage message.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that the 'browser' subcommand can be used to startup the tree
browser, it should be listed as a possible subcommand option in
our usage message.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Change summary of git-gui.
Since git-gui does more than create commits, it is unfair to call
it "a commit creation tool". Instead lets just call it a graphical
user interface.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Since git-gui does more than create commits, it is unfair to call
it "a commit creation tool". Instead lets just call it a graphical
user interface.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Display all authors of git-gui.
Now that git-gui has been released to the public as part of Git 1.5.0
I am starting to see some work from other people beyond myself and
Paul. Consequently the copyright for git-gui is not strictly the
two of us anymore, and these others deserve to have some credit
given to them.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that git-gui has been released to the public as part of Git 1.5.0
I am starting to see some work from other people beyond myself and
Paul. Consequently the copyright for git-gui is not strictly the
two of us anymore, and these others deserve to have some credit
given to them.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Use mixed path for docs on Cygwin.
The Firefox browser requires that a URL use / to delimit directories.
This is instead of \, as \ gets escaped by the browser into its hex
escape code and then relative URLs are incorrectly resolved, Firefox
no longer sees the directories for what they are. Since we are
handing the browser a true URL, we better use the standard / for
directories.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The Firefox browser requires that a URL use / to delimit directories.
This is instead of \, as \ gets escaped by the browser into its hex
escape code and then relative URLs are incorrectly resolved, Firefox
no longer sees the directories for what they are. Since we are
handing the browser a true URL, we better use the standard / for
directories.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Correct crash when saving options in blame mode.
Martin Waitz noticed that git-gui crashed while saving the user's
options out if the application was started in blame mode. This
was caused by the do_save_config procedure invoking reshow_diff
incase the number of context lines was modified by the user.
Because we bypassed main window UI setup to enter blame mode we
did not set many of the globals which were accessed by reshow_diff,
and reading unset variables is an error in Tcl.
Aside from moving the globals to be set earlier, I also modified
reshow_diff to not invoke clear_diff if there is no path currently
in the diff viewer. This way reshow_diff does not crash when in
blame mode due to the $ui_diff command not being defined.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Martin Waitz noticed that git-gui crashed while saving the user's
options out if the application was started in blame mode. This
was caused by the do_save_config procedure invoking reshow_diff
incase the number of context lines was modified by the user.
Because we bypassed main window UI setup to enter blame mode we
did not set many of the globals which were accessed by reshow_diff,
and reading unset variables is an error in Tcl.
Aside from moving the globals to be set earlier, I also modified
reshow_diff to not invoke clear_diff if there is no path currently
in the diff viewer. This way reshow_diff does not crash when in
blame mode due to the $ui_diff command not being defined.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Expose the browser as a subcommand.
Some users may find being able to browse around an arbitrary
branch to be handy, so we now expose our graphical browser
through `git gui browse <committish>`.
Yes, I'm being somewhat lazy and making the user give us
the name of the branch to browse. They can always enter
HEAD.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Some users may find being able to browse around an arbitrary
branch to be handy, so we now expose our graphical browser
through `git gui browse <committish>`.
Yes, I'm being somewhat lazy and making the user give us
the name of the branch to browse. They can always enter
HEAD.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Create new branches from a tag.
I'm missing the possibility to base a new branch on a tag.
The following adds a tag drop down to the new branch dialog.
Signed-off-by: Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I'm missing the possibility to base a new branch on a tag.
The following adds a tag drop down to the new branch dialog.
Signed-off-by: Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Prefer version file over git-describe.
Some distributions are using Git for part of their package
management system, but unpack Git's own source code for
delivery from the .tar.gz. This means that when we walk
up the directory tree with git-describe to locate a Git
repository, the repository we find is for the distribution
and *not* for git-gui. Consequently any tag we might find
there is bogus and does not apply to us.
In this case the version file should always exist and be
readable, as the packager is working from the released
.tar.gz sources. So we should always favor the version
file over anything git-describe guess for us.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Some distributions are using Git for part of their package
management system, but unpack Git's own source code for
delivery from the .tar.gz. This means that when we walk
up the directory tree with git-describe to locate a Git
repository, the repository we find is for the distribution
and *not* for git-gui. Consequently any tag we might find
there is bogus and does not apply to us.
In this case the version file should always exist and be
readable, as the packager is working from the released
.tar.gz sources. So we should always favor the version
file over anything git-describe guess for us.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Print version on the console.
Like `git version`, `git gui version` (or `git gui --version`) shows
the version of git-gui, in case the user needs to know this, without
looking at it in the GUI about dialog.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Like `git version`, `git gui version` (or `git gui --version`) shows
the version of git-gui, in case the user needs to know this, without
looking at it in the GUI about dialog.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: More consistently display the application name.
I started to find it confusing that git-gui would refer to itself
as git-citool when it was started through the citool hardlink, or
with the citool subcommand. What was especially confusing was the
options dialog and the about dialog, as both seemed to imply they
were somehow different from the git-gui versions. In actuality
there is no difference at all.
Now we just call our options menu item 'Options...' (skipping the
application name) and our About dialog now always shows git-gui
within the short description (above the copyleft notice) and in
the version field.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I started to find it confusing that git-gui would refer to itself
as git-citool when it was started through the citool hardlink, or
with the citool subcommand. What was especially confusing was the
options dialog and the about dialog, as both seemed to imply they
were somehow different from the git-gui versions. In actuality
there is no difference at all.
Now we just call our options menu item 'Options...' (skipping the
application name) and our About dialog now always shows git-gui
within the short description (above the copyleft notice) and in
the version field.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Permit merging tags into the current branch.
It was pointed out on the git mailing list by Martin Koegler that
we did not show tags as possible things to merge into the current
branch. They actually are, and core Git's Grand Unified Merge
Driver will accept them just like any other commit.
So our merge dialog now requests all refs/heads, refs/remotes and
refs/tags named refs and attempts to match them against the commits
not in HEAD. One complicating factor here is that we must use the
%(*objectname) field when talking about an annotated tag, as they
will not appear in the output of rev-list.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
It was pointed out on the git mailing list by Martin Koegler that
we did not show tags as possible things to merge into the current
branch. They actually are, and core Git's Grand Unified Merge
Driver will accept them just like any other commit.
So our merge dialog now requests all refs/heads, refs/remotes and
refs/tags named refs and attempts to match them against the commits
not in HEAD. One complicating factor here is that we must use the
%(*objectname) field when talking about an annotated tag, as they
will not appear in the output of rev-list.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Basic version check to ensure git 1.5.0 or later is used.
This is a very crude (but hopefully effective) check against the
`git` executable found in our PATH. Some of the subcommands and
options that git-gui requires to be present to operate were created
during the 1.5.0 development cycle, so 1.5 is the minimum version
of git that we can expect to support.
There actually are early releases of 1.5 (e.g. 1.5.0-rc0) that
don't have everything we expect (like `blame --incremental`) but
these are purely academic at this point. 1.5.0 final was tagged
and released just a few hours ago. The release candidates will
(hopefully) fade into the dark quickly.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This is a very crude (but hopefully effective) check against the
`git` executable found in our PATH. Some of the subcommands and
options that git-gui requires to be present to operate were created
during the 1.5.0 development cycle, so 1.5 is the minimum version
of git that we can expect to support.
There actually are early releases of 1.5 (e.g. 1.5.0-rc0) that
don't have everything we expect (like `blame --incremental`) but
these are purely academic at this point. 1.5.0 final was tagged
and released just a few hours ago. The release candidates will
(hopefully) fade into the dark quickly.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Refactor 'exec git subcmd' idiom.
As we frequently need to execute a Git subcommand and obtain
its returned output we are making heavy use of [exec git foo]
to run foo. As I'm concerned about possibly needing to carry
environment data through a shell on Cygwin for at least some
subcommands, I'm migrating all current calls to a new git
proc. This actually makes the code look cleaner too, as
we aren't saying 'exec git' everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
As we frequently need to execute a Git subcommand and obtain
its returned output we are making heavy use of [exec git foo]
to run foo. As I'm concerned about possibly needing to carry
environment data through a shell on Cygwin for at least some
subcommands, I'm migrating all current calls to a new git
proc. This actually makes the code look cleaner too, as
we aren't saying 'exec git' everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: fix typo in GIT-VERSION-GEN, "/dev/null" not "/devnull"
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Change base version to 0.6.
This is the start of the 0.6 series of git-gui. I'm calling it 0.6
(rather than any other value) as I already had a private tag on
one system based on 0.5, and that tag is quite a bit behind this
version.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This is the start of the 0.6 series of git-gui. I'm calling it 0.6
(rather than any other value) as I already had a private tag on
one system based on 0.5, and that tag is quite a bit behind this
version.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Guess our version accurately as a subproject.
When we are included as a subproject, such as how git.git carries
us, we want to retain our own version number and not the version
number assigned by git.git's own tags. Consequently we need to
locate the correct tag which applies to our tree content and
its commit lineage.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When we are included as a subproject, such as how git.git carries
us, we want to retain our own version number and not the version
number assigned by git.git's own tags. Consequently we need to
locate the correct tag which applies to our tree content and
its commit lineage.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Handle gitgui tags in version gen.
I've decided to use gitgui-0.5 as the format for tags in the
git-gui repository. The prefix of gitgui was chosen here to
make its namespace different from the namespace used by git
itself, allowing developers to pull both tag namespaces into
the same repository.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I've decided to use gitgui-0.5 as the format for tags in the
git-gui repository. The prefix of gitgui was chosen here to
make its namespace different from the namespace used by git
itself, allowing developers to pull both tag namespaces into
the same repository.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Generate a version file on demand.
Because git-gui is being shipped as a subproject of the main
Git project and will often have a different lifecycle than
the main Git project, we should ship our own version number
in the release tarball rather than relying on the main Git
version file.
Git's master Makefile will invoke our own with the target
dist-version, asking us to save off our GITGUI_VERSION value
into our own version file, so that our GIT-VERSION-GEN script
can recover it at build time.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Because git-gui is being shipped as a subproject of the main
Git project and will often have a different lifecycle than
the main Git project, we should ship our own version number
in the release tarball rather than relying on the main Git
version file.
Git's master Makefile will invoke our own with the target
dist-version, asking us to save off our GITGUI_VERSION value
into our own version file, so that our GIT-VERSION-GEN script
can recover it at build time.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Rename GIT_VERSION to GITGUI_VERSION.
Now that the decision has been made to treat git-gui as a
subproject, rather than merging it directly into git, we
should use a different substitution for our version value
to avoid any possible confusion.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that the decision has been made to treat git-gui as a
subproject, rather than merging it directly into git, we
should use a different substitution for our version value
to avoid any possible confusion.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Allow gitexecdir, INSTALL to be set by the caller.
When used as a subproject within git.git our Makefile must honor
the gitexecdir which git.git's Makefile is passing down to us,
ensuring that we install our executables into the libexec chosen
by the end-user or packager.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When used as a subproject within git.git our Makefile must honor
the gitexecdir which git.git's Makefile is passing down to us,
ensuring that we install our executables into the libexec chosen
by the end-user or packager.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Stop deleting gitk preferences.
Now that git 1.5.0 and later contains a version of gitk that uses
correct geometry on Windows platforms, even if ~/.gitk exists, we
should not delete the user's ~/.gitk to work around the bug. It
is downright mean to remove a user's preferences for another app.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that git 1.5.0 and later contains a version of gitk that uses
correct geometry on Windows platforms, even if ~/.gitk exists, we
should not delete the user's ~/.gitk to work around the bug. It
is downright mean to remove a user's preferences for another app.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Focus into blame panels on Mac OS.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Improve annotated file display.
Rather than trying to mark the background color of the line numbers
to show which lines have annotated data loaded, we now show a ruler
between the line numbers and the file data. This ruler is just 1
character wide and its background color is set to grey to denote
which lines have annotation ready. I had to make this change as I
kept loosing the annotation marker when a line was no longer colored
as part of the current selection.
We now color the lines blamed on the current commit in yellow, the
lines in the commit which came after (descendant) in red (hotter,
less tested) and the lines in the commit before (ancestor) in blue
(cooler, better tested).
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Rather than trying to mark the background color of the line numbers
to show which lines have annotated data loaded, we now show a ruler
between the line numbers and the file data. This ruler is just 1
character wide and its background color is set to grey to denote
which lines have annotation ready. I had to make this change as I
kept loosing the annotation marker when a line was no longer colored
as part of the current selection.
We now color the lines blamed on the current commit in yellow, the
lines in the commit which came after (descendant) in red (hotter,
less tested) and the lines in the commit before (ancestor) in blue
(cooler, better tested).
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Jump to the first annotation block as soon as its available.
To help clue users into the fact that annotation data arrives
incrementally, and that they should try to locate the region
they want while the tool is running, we jump to the first line
of the first annotation if the user has not already clicked on
a line they are interested in and if the window is still looking
at the very top of the file.
Since it takes a second (at least on my PowerBook) to even generate
the first annotation for git-gui.sh, the user should have plenty of
time to adjust the scrollbar or click on a line even before we get
that first annotation record in, which allows the user to bypass
our automatic jumping.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To help clue users into the fact that annotation data arrives
incrementally, and that they should try to locate the region
they want while the tool is running, we jump to the first line
of the first annotation if the user has not already clicked on
a line they are interested in and if the window is still looking
at the very top of the file.
Since it takes a second (at least on my PowerBook) to even generate
the first annotation for git-gui.sh, the user should have plenty of
time to adjust the scrollbar or click on a line even before we get
that first annotation record in, which allows the user to bypass
our automatic jumping.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Redesign the display of annotated files.
Using 180 columns worth of screen space to display just 20 columns of
file data and 160 columns worth of annotation information is not
practically useful. Users need/want to see the file data, and have
the anotation associated with it displayed in a detail pane only when
they have focused on a particular region of the file.
Now our file viewer has a small 10-line high pane below the file
which shows the commit message for the commit this line was blamed
on. The columns have all been removed, except the current line
number column as that has some real value when trying to locate an
interesting block.
To keep the user entertained we have a progress meter in the status
bar of the viewer which lets them know how many lines have been
annotated, and how much has been completed. We use a grey background
on the line numbers for lines which we have obtained annotation from,
and we color all lines in the current commit with a yellow background,
so they stand out when scanning through the file. All other lines
are kept with a white background, making the yellow really pop.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Using 180 columns worth of screen space to display just 20 columns of
file data and 160 columns worth of annotation information is not
practically useful. Users need/want to see the file data, and have
the anotation associated with it displayed in a detail pane only when
they have focused on a particular region of the file.
Now our file viewer has a small 10-line high pane below the file
which shows the commit message for the commit this line was blamed
on. The columns have all been removed, except the current line
number column as that has some real value when trying to locate an
interesting block.
To keep the user entertained we have a progress meter in the status
bar of the viewer which lets them know how many lines have been
annotated, and how much has been completed. We use a grey background
on the line numbers for lines which we have obtained annotation from,
and we color all lines in the current commit with a yellow background,
so they stand out when scanning through the file. All other lines
are kept with a white background, making the yellow really pop.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Use git-config now over git-repo-config.
Now that core Git has "renamed" git-repo-config to git-config,
we should do the same. I don't know how long core Git will
keep the repo-config command, and since git-gui's userbase
is so small and almost entirely on some flavor of 1.5.0-rc2
or later, where the rename has already taken place, it should
be OK to rename now.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that core Git has "renamed" git-repo-config to git-config,
we should do the same. I don't know how long core Git will
keep the repo-config command, and since git-gui's userbase
is so small and almost entirely on some flavor of 1.5.0-rc2
or later, where the rename has already taken place, it should
be OK to rename now.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Relabel the Add All action.
One user that I spoke with recently was confused why the 'Add All'
button did not add all of his 'Changed But Not Updated' files.
The particular files in question were new, and thus not known to
Git. Since the 'Add All' routine only updates files which are
already tracked, they were not added automatically.
I suspect that calling this action 'Add Existing' would be less
confusing, so I'm renaming it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
One user that I spoke with recently was confused why the 'Add All'
button did not add all of his 'Changed But Not Updated' files.
The particular files in question were new, and thus not known to
Git. Since the 'Add All' routine only updates files which are
already tracked, they were not added automatically.
I suspect that calling this action 'Add Existing' would be less
confusing, so I'm renaming it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Select subcommands like git does.
If we are invoked as `git-foo`, then we should run the `foo` subcommand,
as the user has made some sort of link from `git-foo` to our actual
program code. So we should honor their request.
If we are invoked as `git-gui foo`, the user has not made a link (or
did, but is not using it right now) so we should execute the `foo`
subcommand.
We now can start the single commit UI mode via `git-citool` and also
through `git gui citool`.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If we are invoked as `git-foo`, then we should run the `foo` subcommand,
as the user has made some sort of link from `git-foo` to our actual
program code. So we should honor their request.
If we are invoked as `git-gui foo`, the user has not made a link (or
did, but is not using it right now) so we should execute the `foo`
subcommand.
We now can start the single commit UI mode via `git-citool` and also
through `git gui citool`.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: View blame from the command line.
Viewing annotated files is one of those tasks that is relatively
difficult to do in a simple vt100 terminal emulator. The user
really wants to be able to browse through a lot of information,
and to interact with it by navigating through revisions.
Now users can start our file viewer with annotations by running
'git gui blame commit path', thereby seeing the contents of the
given file at the given commit. Right now I am being lazy by
not allowing the user to omit the commit name (and have us thus
assume HEAD).
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Viewing annotated files is one of those tasks that is relatively
difficult to do in a simple vt100 terminal emulator. The user
really wants to be able to browse through a lot of information,
and to interact with it by navigating through revisions.
Now users can start our file viewer with annotations by running
'git gui blame commit path', thereby seeing the contents of the
given file at the given commit. Right now I am being lazy by
not allowing the user to omit the commit name (and have us thus
assume HEAD).
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Optionally save commit buffer on exit.
If the commit area does not exist, don't save the commit message to
a file, or the window geometry. The reason I'm doing this is I want
to make the main window entirely optional, such as if the user has
asked us to show a blame from the command line. In such cases the
commit area won't exist and trying to get its text would cause an
error.
If we are running without the commit message area, we cannot save
our window geometry either, as the root window '.' won't be a normal
commit window.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the commit area does not exist, don't save the commit message to
a file, or the window geometry. The reason I'm doing this is I want
to make the main window entirely optional, such as if the user has
asked us to show a blame from the command line. In such cases the
commit area won't exist and trying to get its text would cause an
error.
If we are running without the commit message area, we cannot save
our window geometry either, as the root window '.' won't be a normal
commit window.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Separate transport/branch menus from multicommit.
These are now controlled by the transport and branch options, rather
than the multicommit option.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
These are now controlled by the transport and branch options, rather
than the multicommit option.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Refactor single_commit to a proc.
This is a minor code cleanup to make working with what used to be the
$single_commit flag easier. Its also to better handle various UI
configurations, depending on command line parameters given by the
user, or perhaps user preferences.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This is a minor code cleanup to make working with what used to be the
$single_commit flag easier. Its also to better handle various UI
configurations, depending on command line parameters given by the
user, or perhaps user preferences.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Replace \ with \\ when showing paths.
We already replace \n with \\n so that Tk widgets don't start a new
display line with part of a file path which is just unlucky enough
to contain an LF. But then its confusing to read a path whose name
actually contains \n as literal characters. Escaping \ to \\ would
make that case display as \\n, clarifying the output.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We already replace \n with \\n so that Tk widgets don't start a new
display line with part of a file path which is just unlucky enough
to contain an LF. But then its confusing to read a path whose name
actually contains \n as literal characters. Escaping \ to \\ would
make that case display as \\n, clarifying the output.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Support keyboard traversal in browser.
Users want to navigate the file list shown in our branch browser
windows using the keyboard. So we now support basic traversal
with the arrow keys:
Up/Down: Move the "selection bar" to focus on a different name.
Return: Move into the subtree, or open the annotated file.
M1-Right: Ditto.
M1-Up: Move to the parent tree.
M1-Left: Ditto.
Probably the only feature missing from this is to key a leading part
of the file name and jump directly to that file (or subtree).
This change did require a bit of refactoring, to pull the navigation
logic out of the mouse click procedure and into more generic routines
which can also be used in bindings.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Users want to navigate the file list shown in our branch browser
windows using the keyboard. So we now support basic traversal
with the arrow keys:
Up/Down: Move the "selection bar" to focus on a different name.
Return: Move into the subtree, or open the annotated file.
M1-Right: Ditto.
M1-Up: Move to the parent tree.
M1-Left: Ditto.
Probably the only feature missing from this is to key a leading part
of the file name and jump directly to that file (or subtree).
This change did require a bit of refactoring, to pull the navigation
logic out of the mouse click procedure and into more generic routines
which can also be used in bindings.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Update known branches during rescan.
If the user has created (or deleted) a branch through an external tool,
and uses Rescan, they probably are trying to make git-gui update to show
their newly created branch.
So now we load all known heads and update the branch menu during any
rescan operation, just in-case the set of known branches was modified.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the user has created (or deleted) a branch through an external tool,
and uses Rescan, they probably are trying to make git-gui update to show
their newly created branch.
So now we load all known heads and update the branch menu during any
rescan operation, just in-case the set of known branches was modified.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Assign background colors to each blame hunk.
To help the user visually see which lines are associated with each other
in the file we attempt to sign a unique background color to each commit
and then render all text associated with that commit using that color.
This works out OK for a file which has very few commits in it; but
most files don't have that property.
What we really need to do is look at what colors are used by our
neighboring commits (if known yet) and pick a color which does not
conflict with our neighbor. If we have run out of colors then we
should force our neighbor to recolor too. Yes, its the graph coloring
problem.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To help the user visually see which lines are associated with each other
in the file we attempt to sign a unique background color to each commit
and then render all text associated with that commit using that color.
This works out OK for a file which has very few commits in it; but
most files don't have that property.
What we really need to do is look at what colors are used by our
neighboring commits (if known yet) and pick a color which does not
conflict with our neighbor. If we have run out of colors then we
should force our neighbor to recolor too. Yes, its the graph coloring
problem.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Use a grid layout for the blame viewer.
Using a panedwindow to display the blame viewer's individual columns
just doesn't make sense. Most of the important data fits within the
columns we have allocated, and those that don't the leading part fits
and that's good enough. There are just too many columns within this
viewer to let the user sanely control individual column widths. This
change shouldn't really be an issue for most git-gui users as their
displays should be large enough to accept this massive dump of data.
We now also have a properly working horizontal scrollbar for the
current file data area. This makes it easier to get away with a
narrow window when screen space is limited, as you can still scroll
around within the file content.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Using a panedwindow to display the blame viewer's individual columns
just doesn't make sense. Most of the important data fits within the
columns we have allocated, and those that don't the leading part fits
and that's good enough. There are just too many columns within this
viewer to let the user sanely control individual column widths. This
change shouldn't really be an issue for most git-gui users as their
displays should be large enough to accept this massive dump of data.
We now also have a properly working horizontal scrollbar for the
current file data area. This makes it easier to get away with a
narrow window when screen space is limited, as you can still scroll
around within the file content.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Install column headers in blame viewer.
I started to get confused about what each column meant in the blame
viewer, and I'm the guy who wrote the code! So now git-gui hints to
the user about what each column is by drawing headers at the top.
Unfortunately this meant I had to use those dreaded frame objects
which seem to cause so much pain on Windows.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I started to get confused about what each column meant in the blame
viewer, and I'm the guy who wrote the code! So now git-gui hints to
the user about what each column is by drawing headers at the top.
Unfortunately this meant I had to use those dreaded frame objects
which seem to cause so much pain on Windows.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Display original filename and line number in blame.
When we annotate a file and show its line data, we're already asking
for copy and movement detection (-M -C). This costs extra time, but
gives extra data. Since we are asking for the extra data we really
should show it to the user.
Now the blame UI has two additional columns, one for the original
filename (in the case of a move/copy between files) and one for the
original line number of the current line of code.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When we annotate a file and show its line data, we're already asking
for copy and movement detection (-M -C). This costs extra time, but
gives extra data. Since we are asking for the extra data we really
should show it to the user.
Now the blame UI has two additional columns, one for the original
filename (in the case of a move/copy between files) and one for the
original line number of the current line of code.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Correctly handle spaces in filepaths.
Anytime are about to open a pipe on what may be user data we need to
make sure the value is escaped correctly into a Tcl list, so that the
executed subprocess will receive the right arguments. For the most
part we were already doing this correctly, but a handful of locations
did not.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Anytime are about to open a pipe on what may be user data we need to
make sure the value is escaped correctly into a Tcl list, so that the
executed subprocess will receive the right arguments. For the most
part we were already doing this correctly, but a handful of locations
did not.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Use -M and -C when running blame.
Since we run blame incrementally in the background we might as well get
as much data as we can from the file. Adding -M and -C definately makes
it take longer to compute the revision annotations, but since they are
streamed in and updated as they are discovered we'll get recent data
almost immediately anyway.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Since we run blame incrementally in the background we might as well get
as much data as we can from the file. Adding -M and -C definately makes
it take longer to compute the revision annotations, but since they are
streamed in and updated as they are discovered we'll get recent data
almost immediately anyway.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Allow users to edit user.name, user.email from options.
Users may need to be able to alter their user.name or user.email
configuration settings. If they are mostly a git-gui user they
should be able to view/set these important values from within
the git-gui environment, rather than needing to edit a raw text
file on their local filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Users may need to be able to alter their user.name or user.email
configuration settings. If they are mostly a git-gui user they
should be able to view/set these important values from within
the git-gui environment, rather than needing to edit a raw text
file on their local filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Display the current branch name in browsers.
Rather than using HEAD for the current branch, use the actual name of
the current branch in the browser. This way the user knows what a
browser is browsing if they open up different browsers while on different
branches.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Rather than using HEAD for the current branch, use the actual name of
the current branch in the browser. This way the user knows what a
browser is browsing if they open up different browsers while on different
branches.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Improve the icons used in the browser display.
Real icons which seem to indicate going up to the parent (an up arrow)
and a subdirectory (an open folder). Files are now drawn with the
file_mod icon, like a modified file is. This just looks better as it
is more consistent with the rest of our UI.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Real icons which seem to indicate going up to the parent (an up arrow)
and a subdirectory (an open folder). Files are now drawn with the
file_mod icon, like a modified file is. This just looks better as it
is more consistent with the rest of our UI.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Implemented file browser and incremental blame.
This rather huge change provides a browser for the current branch. The
browser simply shows the contents of tree HEAD, and lets the user drill
down through the tree. The icons used really stink, as I just copied in
icon which we already had. I really need to replace the file_dir and
file_uplevel icons with something more useful.
If the user double clicks on a file within the browser we open it in
a blame viewer. This makes use of the new incremental blame feature
that Linus just added yesterday to core Git. Fortunately the feature
will be in 1.5.0 final so we can rely on having it available here.
Since the blame engine is incremental the user will get blame data
for groups which can be determined early. Git will slowly fill in
the remaining lines as it goes.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This rather huge change provides a browser for the current branch. The
browser simply shows the contents of tree HEAD, and lets the user drill
down through the tree. The icons used really stink, as I just copied in
icon which we already had. I really need to replace the file_dir and
file_uplevel icons with something more useful.
If the user double clicks on a file within the browser we open it in
a blame viewer. This makes use of the new incremental blame feature
that Linus just added yesterday to core Git. Fortunately the feature
will be in 1.5.0 final so we can rely on having it available here.
Since the blame engine is incremental the user will get blame data
for groups which can be determined early. Git will slowly fill in
the remaining lines as it goes.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Test for Cygwin differently than from Windows.
Running on Cygwin is different than if we were running through MinGW.
In the Cygwin case we have cygpath available to us, we need to perform
UNIX<->Windows path translation sometimes, and we need to perform odd
things like spawning our own login shells to perform network operations.
But in the MinGW case these don't occur. Git knows native Windows file
paths, and login shells may not even exist.
Now git-gui will avoid running cygpath unless it knows its on Cygwin.
It also uses a different shortcut type when Cygwin is not present, and
it avoids invoking /bin/sh to execute hooks if Cygwin is not present.
This latter part probably needs more testing in the MinGW case.
This change also improves how we start gitk. If the user is on any type
of Windows system its known that gitk won't start right if ~/.gitk exists.
So we delete it before starting if we are running on any type of Windows
operating system. We always use the same wish executable which launched
git-gui to start gitk; this way on Windows we don't have to jump back to
/bin/sh just to go into the first wish found in the user's PATH. This
should help on MinGW when we probably don't want to spawn a shell just
to start gitk.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Running on Cygwin is different than if we were running through MinGW.
In the Cygwin case we have cygpath available to us, we need to perform
UNIX<->Windows path translation sometimes, and we need to perform odd
things like spawning our own login shells to perform network operations.
But in the MinGW case these don't occur. Git knows native Windows file
paths, and login shells may not even exist.
Now git-gui will avoid running cygpath unless it knows its on Cygwin.
It also uses a different shortcut type when Cygwin is not present, and
it avoids invoking /bin/sh to execute hooks if Cygwin is not present.
This latter part probably needs more testing in the MinGW case.
This change also improves how we start gitk. If the user is on any type
of Windows system its known that gitk won't start right if ~/.gitk exists.
So we delete it before starting if we are running on any type of Windows
operating system. We always use the same wish executable which launched
git-gui to start gitk; this way on Windows we don't have to jump back to
/bin/sh just to go into the first wish found in the user's PATH. This
should help on MinGW when we probably don't want to spawn a shell just
to start gitk.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Offer quick access to the HTML formatted documentation.
Users may want to be able to read Git documentation, even if they
are not command line users. There are many important concepts and
terms covered within the standard Git documentation which would be
useful to even non command line using people.
We now try to offer an 'Online Documentation' menu option within the
Help menu. First we try to guess to see what browser the user has
setup. We default to instaweb.browser, if set, as this is probably
accurate for the user's configuration. If not then we try to guess
based on the operating system and the available browsers for each.
We prefer documentation which is installed parallel to Git's own
executables, e.g. `git --exec-path`/../Documentation/index.html, as
that is how I typically install the HTML docs. If those are not found
then we open the documentation published on kernel.org.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Users may want to be able to read Git documentation, even if they
are not command line users. There are many important concepts and
terms covered within the standard Git documentation which would be
useful to even non command line using people.
We now try to offer an 'Online Documentation' menu option within the
Help menu. First we try to guess to see what browser the user has
setup. We default to instaweb.browser, if set, as this is probably
accurate for the user's configuration. If not then we try to guess
based on the operating system and the available browsers for each.
We prefer documentation which is installed parallel to Git's own
executables, e.g. `git --exec-path`/../Documentation/index.html, as
that is how I typically install the HTML docs. If those are not found
then we open the documentation published on kernel.org.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Reword meaning of merge.summary.
OK, its official, I'm not reading documentation as well as I should be.
Core Git's merge.summary configuration option is used to control the
generation of the text appearing within the merge commit itself. It
is not (and never has been) used to default the --no-summary command
line option, which disables the diffstat at the end of the merge.
I completely blame Git for naming two unrelated options almost the
exact same thing. But its my own fault for allowing git-gui to
confuse the two.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
OK, its official, I'm not reading documentation as well as I should be.
Core Git's merge.summary configuration option is used to control the
generation of the text appearing within the merge commit itself. It
is not (and never has been) used to default the --no-summary command
line option, which disables the diffstat at the end of the merge.
I completely blame Git for naming two unrelated options almost the
exact same thing. But its my own fault for allowing git-gui to
confuse the two.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Support merge.summary, merge.verbosity.
Changed our private merge summary config option to be the same as the
merge.summary option supported by core Git. This means setting the
"Show Merge Summary" flag in git-gui will have the same effect on
the command line.
In the same vein I've also added merge.verbosity to the gui options,
allowing the user to adjust the verbosity level of the recursive
merge strategy. I happen to like level 1 and suggest that other users
use that, but level 2 is the core Git default right now so we'll use
the same default in git-gui.
Unfortunately it appears as though core Git has broken support for
the merge.summary option, even though its still in the documentation
For the time being we should pass along --no-summary to git-merge if
merge.summary is false.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Changed our private merge summary config option to be the same as the
merge.summary option supported by core Git. This means setting the
"Show Merge Summary" flag in git-gui will have the same effect on
the command line.
In the same vein I've also added merge.verbosity to the gui options,
allowing the user to adjust the verbosity level of the recursive
merge strategy. I happen to like level 1 and suggest that other users
use that, but level 2 is the core Git default right now so we'll use
the same default in git-gui.
Unfortunately it appears as though core Git has broken support for
the merge.summary option, even though its still in the documentation
For the time being we should pass along --no-summary to git-merge if
merge.summary is false.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Always offer scrollbars for branch lists.
Anytime we use a listbox to show branch names its possible for the
listbox to exceed 10 entries (actually its probably very common).
So we should always offer a scrollbar for the Y axis on these
listboxes. I just forgot to add it when I defined them.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Anytime we use a listbox to show branch names its possible for the
listbox to exceed 10 entries (actually its probably very common).
So we should always offer a scrollbar for the Y axis on these
listboxes. I just forgot to add it when I defined them.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Don't allow merges in the middle of other things.
If the user is in the middle of a commit they have files which are
modified. These may conflict with any merge that they may want
to perform, which would cause problems if the user wants to abort
a bad merge as we wouldn't have a checkpoint to roll back onto.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If the user is in the middle of a commit they have files which are
modified. These may conflict with any merge that they may want
to perform, which would cause problems if the user wants to abort
a bad merge as we wouldn't have a checkpoint to roll back onto.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Don't allow users to commit a bad octopus merge.
If an octopus merge goes horribly wrong git-merge will leave the
working directory and index dirty, but will not leave behind a
MERGE_HEAD file for a later commit. Consequently we won't know
its a merge commit and instead would let the user resolve the
conflicts and commit a single-parent commit, which is wrong.
So now if an octopus merge fails we notify the user that the
merge did not work, tell them we will reset the working directory,
and suggest that they merge one branch at a time. This prevents
the user from committing a bad octopus merge.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If an octopus merge goes horribly wrong git-merge will leave the
working directory and index dirty, but will not leave behind a
MERGE_HEAD file for a later commit. Consequently we won't know
its a merge commit and instead would let the user resolve the
conflicts and commit a single-parent commit, which is wrong.
So now if an octopus merge fails we notify the user that the
merge did not work, tell them we will reset the working directory,
and suggest that they merge one branch at a time. This prevents
the user from committing a bad octopus merge.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Update status bar during a merge.
I got slightly confused when I did two merges in a row, as the status
bar said "merge completed successfully" while the second merge was
still running. Now we show what branches are actively being merged.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I got slightly confused when I did two merges in a row, as the status
bar said "merge completed successfully" while the second merge was
still running. Now we show what branches are actively being merged.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Let users abort with `reset --hard` type logic.
If you get into the middle of a merge that turns out to be horrible
and just not something you want to do right now, odds are you need
to run `git reset --hard` to recover your working directory to a
pre-merge state.
We now offer Merge->Abort Merge for exactly this purpose, however
its also useful to thow away a non-merge, as its basically the same
logic as `git reset --hard`.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If you get into the middle of a merge that turns out to be horrible
and just not something you want to do right now, odds are you need
to run `git reset --hard` to recover your working directory to a
pre-merge state.
We now offer Merge->Abort Merge for exactly this purpose, however
its also useful to thow away a non-merge, as its basically the same
logic as `git reset --hard`.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Implement local merge operations.
To allow users to merge local heads and tracking branches we now offer
a dialog which lets the user select 1-15 branches and merge them using
the stock `git merge` Grand Unified Merge Driver.
Originally I had wanted to implement this merge internally within git-gui
as I consider GUMD to be mostly Porcelain-ish, but the truth is it does
its job exceedingly well and its a relatively complex chunk of code.
I'll probably circle back later and try to remove the invocation of GUMD
from git-gui, but right now it lets me get the job done faster.
Users cannot start a merge if they are currently in the middle of one,
or if they are amending a commit. Trying to do either is just stupid
and should be stopped as early as possible.
I've also made it simple for users to startup a gitk session prior to
a merge by offering a Visualize button which runs `gitk $revs --not HEAD`,
where $revs is the list of branches currently selected in the merge
dialog. This makes it quite simple to find out what the damage will
be to the current branch if you were to carry out the currently proposed
merge.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To allow users to merge local heads and tracking branches we now offer
a dialog which lets the user select 1-15 branches and merge them using
the stock `git merge` Grand Unified Merge Driver.
Originally I had wanted to implement this merge internally within git-gui
as I consider GUMD to be mostly Porcelain-ish, but the truth is it does
its job exceedingly well and its a relatively complex chunk of code.
I'll probably circle back later and try to remove the invocation of GUMD
from git-gui, but right now it lets me get the job done faster.
Users cannot start a merge if they are currently in the middle of one,
or if they are amending a commit. Trying to do either is just stupid
and should be stopped as early as possible.
I've also made it simple for users to startup a gitk session prior to
a merge by offering a Visualize button which runs `gitk $revs --not HEAD`,
where $revs is the list of branches currently selected in the merge
dialog. This makes it quite simple to find out what the damage will
be to the current branch if you were to carry out the currently proposed
merge.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Use builtin version of 'git gc'.
Technically the new git-gc command is strictly Porcelain; its invoking
multiple plumbing commands to do its work. Since git-gui tries to not
rely on Porclain we shouldn't be invoking git-gc directly, instead we
should perform its tasks on our own.
To make this easy I've created console_chain, which takes a list of
tasks to perform and runs them all in the same console window. If
any individual task fails then the chain stops running and the window
shows a failure bar. Only once all tasks have been completed will it
invoke console_done with a successful status.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Technically the new git-gc command is strictly Porcelain; its invoking
multiple plumbing commands to do its work. Since git-gui tries to not
rely on Porclain we shouldn't be invoking git-gc directly, instead we
should perform its tasks on our own.
To make this easy I've created console_chain, which takes a list of
tasks to perform and runs them all in the same console window. If
any individual task fails then the chain stops running and the window
shows a failure bar. Only once all tasks have been completed will it
invoke console_done with a successful status.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Refactor console success/failure handling.
Because I want to be able to run multiple output-producing commands
in a single 'console' window within git-gui I'm refactoring the
console handling routines to require the "after" argument of console_exec.
This should specify a procedure to execute which will receive two args,
the first is the console window handle and the second is the status of
the last command (0 on failure, 1 on success).
A new procedure console_done can be passed to the last console_exec
command to forward perform all cleanup and enable the Close button.
Its status argument is used to update the final status bar on the
bottom of the console window.
This isn't any real logic changing, and no new functionality is in
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Because I want to be able to run multiple output-producing commands
in a single 'console' window within git-gui I'm refactoring the
console handling routines to require the "after" argument of console_exec.
This should specify a procedure to execute which will receive two args,
the first is the console window handle and the second is the status of
the last command (0 on failure, 1 on success).
A new procedure console_done can be passed to the last console_exec
command to forward perform all cleanup and enable the Close button.
Its status argument is used to update the final status bar on the
bottom of the console window.
This isn't any real logic changing, and no new functionality is in
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Always use -v option to push.
Right now `git-push -v` is actually not that verbose; it merely adds
the URL it is pushing to. This can be informative if you are pushing
to a configured remote, as you may not actually remember what URL that
remote is connected to. That detail can be important if the push
fails and you attempt to communicate the errors to a 3rd party to help
you resolve the issue.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Right now `git-push -v` is actually not that verbose; it merely adds
the URL it is pushing to. This can be informative if you are pushing
to a configured remote, as you may not actually remember what URL that
remote is connected to. That detail can be important if the push
fails and you attempt to communicate the errors to a 3rd party to help
you resolve the issue.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui: Remove no longer used pull from remote code.
Because we aren't going to support single click pulling of changes from
an existing remote anytime in the near future, I'm moving the code which
used to perform that action. Hopefully we'll be able to do something
like it in the near-future, but also support local branches just as
easily.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Because we aren't going to support single click pulling of changes from
an existing remote anytime in the near future, I'm moving the code which
used to perform that action. Hopefully we'll be able to do something
like it in the near-future, but also support local branches just as
easily.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>