merge-recursive: never leave index unmerged while recursing
When you are trying to come up with the final result (i.e. depth=0), you
want to record how the conflict arose by registering the state of the
common ancestor, your branch and the other branch in the index, hence you
want to do update_stages().
When you are merging with positive depth, that is because of a criss-cross
merge situation. In such a case, you would need to record the tentative
result, with conflict markers and all, as if the merge went cleanly, even
if there are conflicts, in order to write it out as a tree object later to
be used as a common ancestor tree.
update_file() calls update_file_flags() with update_cache=1 to signal that
the result needs to be written to the index at stage #0 (i.e. merged), and
the code should not clobber the index further by calling update_stages().
The codepath to deal with rename/delete conflict in a recursive merge
however left the index unmerged.
Signed-off-by: Dave Olszewski <cxreg@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When you are trying to come up with the final result (i.e. depth=0), you
want to record how the conflict arose by registering the state of the
common ancestor, your branch and the other branch in the index, hence you
want to do update_stages().
When you are merging with positive depth, that is because of a criss-cross
merge situation. In such a case, you would need to record the tentative
result, with conflict markers and all, as if the merge went cleanly, even
if there are conflicts, in order to write it out as a tree object later to
be used as a common ancestor tree.
update_file() calls update_file_flags() with update_cache=1 to signal that
the result needs to be written to the index at stage #0 (i.e. merged), and
the code should not clobber the index further by calling update_stages().
The codepath to deal with rename/delete conflict in a recursive merge
however left the index unmerged.
Signed-off-by: Dave Olszewski <cxreg@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GIT 1.6.2.5
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'np/maint-no-ofs-delta' into maint
* np/maint-no-ofs-delta:
honor repack.usedeltabaseoffset when fetching packs
* np/maint-no-ofs-delta:
honor repack.usedeltabaseoffset when fetching packs
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.1' into maint
* maint-1.6.1:
GIT 1.6.1.4
Conflicts:
GIT-VERSION-GEN
* maint-1.6.1:
GIT 1.6.1.4
Conflicts:
GIT-VERSION-GEN
GIT 1.6.1.4
With a handful of fixes backmerged from 1.6.2.X series
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With a handful of fixes backmerged from 1.6.2.X series
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'jc/maint-read-tree-multi' into maint
* jc/maint-read-tree-multi:
checkout branch: prime cache-tree fully
read-tree -m A B: prime cache-tree from the switched-to tree
Move prime_cache_tree() to cache-tree.c
read-tree A B: do not corrupt cache-tree
* jc/maint-read-tree-multi:
checkout branch: prime cache-tree fully
read-tree -m A B: prime cache-tree from the switched-to tree
Move prime_cache_tree() to cache-tree.c
read-tree A B: do not corrupt cache-tree
Merge branch 'mk/maint-apply-swap' into maint
* mk/maint-apply-swap:
tests: make test-apply-criss-cross-rename more robust
builtin-apply: keep information about files to be deleted
tests: test applying criss-cross rename patch
* mk/maint-apply-swap:
tests: make test-apply-criss-cross-rename more robust
builtin-apply: keep information about files to be deleted
tests: test applying criss-cross rename patch
Merge branch 'mm/maint-add-p-quit' into maint
* mm/maint-add-p-quit:
git add -p: add missing "q" to patch prompt
* mm/maint-add-p-quit:
git add -p: add missing "q" to patch prompt
Merge branch 'lt/pack-object-memuse' into maint
* lt/pack-object-memuse:
show_object(): push path_name() call further down
process_{tree,blob}: show objects without buffering
* lt/pack-object-memuse:
show_object(): push path_name() call further down
process_{tree,blob}: show objects without buffering
Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack' into maint-1.6.1
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack:
pack-objects: don't loosen objects available in alternate or kept packs
t7700: demonstrate repack flaw which may loosen objects unnecessarily
Remove --kept-pack-only option and associated infrastructure
pack-objects: only repack or loosen objects residing in "local" packs
git-repack.sh: don't use --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects
t7700-repack: add two new tests demonstrating repacking flaws
is_kept_pack(): final clean-up
Simplify is_kept_pack()
Consolidate ignore_packed logic more
has_sha1_kept_pack(): take "struct rev_info"
has_sha1_pack(): refactor "pretend these packs do not exist" interface
git-repack: resist stray environment variable
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack:
pack-objects: don't loosen objects available in alternate or kept packs
t7700: demonstrate repack flaw which may loosen objects unnecessarily
Remove --kept-pack-only option and associated infrastructure
pack-objects: only repack or loosen objects residing in "local" packs
git-repack.sh: don't use --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects
t7700-repack: add two new tests demonstrating repacking flaws
is_kept_pack(): final clean-up
Simplify is_kept_pack()
Consolidate ignore_packed logic more
has_sha1_kept_pack(): take "struct rev_info"
has_sha1_pack(): refactor "pretend these packs do not exist" interface
git-repack: resist stray environment variable
Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-diff-borrow-carefully' into maint-1.6.1
* jc/maint-1.6.0-diff-borrow-carefully:
diff --cached: do not borrow from a work tree when a path is marked as assume-unchanged
* jc/maint-1.6.0-diff-borrow-carefully:
diff --cached: do not borrow from a work tree when a path is marked as assume-unchanged
Merge branch 'bs/maint-1.6.0-tree-walk-prefix' into maint-1.6.1
* bs/maint-1.6.0-tree-walk-prefix:
match_tree_entry(): a pathspec only matches at directory boundaries
tree_entry_interesting: a pathspec only matches at directory boundary
* bs/maint-1.6.0-tree-walk-prefix:
match_tree_entry(): a pathspec only matches at directory boundaries
tree_entry_interesting: a pathspec only matches at directory boundary
honor repack.usedeltabaseoffset when fetching packs
If the local receiving repository has disabled the use of delta base
offset, for example to retain compatibility with older versions of
Git that predate OFS_DELTA, we shouldn't ask for ofs-delta support
when we obtain a pack from the remote server.
[ issue noticed by Shawn Pearce ]
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the local receiving repository has disabled the use of delta base
offset, for example to retain compatibility with older versions of
Git that predate OFS_DELTA, we shouldn't ask for ofs-delta support
when we obtain a pack from the remote server.
[ issue noticed by Shawn Pearce ]
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.1' into maint
* maint-1.6.1:
diff -c -p: do not die on submodules
* maint-1.6.1:
diff -c -p: do not die on submodules
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maint-1.6.1
* maint-1.6.0:
diff -c -p: do not die on submodules
* maint-1.6.0:
diff -c -p: do not die on submodules
diff -c -p: do not die on submodules
The combine diff logic knew only about blobs (and their checked-out form
in the work tree, either regular files or symlinks), and barfed when fed
submodules. This "externalizes" gitlinks in the same way as the normal
patch generation codepath does (i.e. "Subproject commit Xxx\n") to fix the
issue.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The combine diff logic knew only about blobs (and their checked-out form
in the work tree, either regular files or symlinks), and barfed when fed
submodules. This "externalizes" gitlinks in the same way as the normal
patch generation codepath does (i.e. "Subproject commit Xxx\n") to fix the
issue.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.1' into maint
* maint-1.6.1:
grep: fix segfault when "git grep '('" is given
Documentation: fix a grammatical error in api-builtin.txt
builtin-merge: fix a typo in an error message
* maint-1.6.1:
grep: fix segfault when "git grep '('" is given
Documentation: fix a grammatical error in api-builtin.txt
builtin-merge: fix a typo in an error message
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maint-1.6.1
* maint-1.6.0:
grep: fix segfault when "git grep '('" is given
Documentation: fix a grammatical error in api-builtin.txt
builtin-merge: fix a typo in an error message
* maint-1.6.0:
grep: fix segfault when "git grep '('" is given
Documentation: fix a grammatical error in api-builtin.txt
builtin-merge: fix a typo in an error message
grep: fix segfault when "git grep '('" is given
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation: fix a grammatical error in api-builtin.txt
Signed-off-by: Allan Caffee <allan.caffee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan Caffee <allan.caffee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin-merge: fix a typo in an error message
Signed-off-by: Allan Caffee <allan.caffee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan Caffee <allan.caffee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.1' into maint
* maint-1.6.1:
test-genrandom: Add newline to usage string
* maint-1.6.1:
test-genrandom: Add newline to usage string
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maint-1.6.1
* maint-1.6.0:
test-genrandom: Add newline to usage string
* maint-1.6.0:
test-genrandom: Add newline to usage string
test-genrandom: Add newline to usage string
A minor fix to place the terminal input on a new line if test-genrandom
is run with no arguments.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A minor fix to place the terminal input on a new line if test-genrandom
is run with no arguments.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
tests: make test-apply-criss-cross-rename more robust
I realized that this test does check if git-apply succeeds, but doesn't
tell if it applies patches correctly. So I added test_cmp to check it.
I also added a test which checks swapping three files.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I realized that this test does check if git-apply succeeds, but doesn't
tell if it applies patches correctly. So I added test_cmp to check it.
I also added a test which checks swapping three files.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin-apply: keep information about files to be deleted
Example correct diff generated by `diff -M -B' might look like this:
diff --git a/file1 b/file2
similarity index 100%
rename from file1
rename to file2
diff --git a/file2 b/file1
similarity index 100%
rename from file2
rename to file1
Information about removing `file2' comes after information about creation
of new `file2' (renamed from `file1'). Existing implementation isn't able to
apply such patch, because it has to know in advance which files will be
removed.
This patch populates fn_table with information about removal of files
before calling check_patch() for each patch to be applied.
Signed-off-by: Michał Kiedrowicz <michal.kiedrowicz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Example correct diff generated by `diff -M -B' might look like this:
diff --git a/file1 b/file2
similarity index 100%
rename from file1
rename to file2
diff --git a/file2 b/file1
similarity index 100%
rename from file2
rename to file1
Information about removing `file2' comes after information about creation
of new `file2' (renamed from `file1'). Existing implementation isn't able to
apply such patch, because it has to know in advance which files will be
removed.
This patch populates fn_table with information about removal of files
before calling check_patch() for each patch to be applied.
Signed-off-by: Michał Kiedrowicz <michal.kiedrowicz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
tests: test applying criss-cross rename patch
Originally reported by Linus in $gmane/116198
Signed-off-by: Michał Kiedrowicz <michal.kiedrowicz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally reported by Linus in $gmane/116198
Signed-off-by: Michał Kiedrowicz <michal.kiedrowicz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitcvs-migration: Link to git-cvsimport documentation
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <flichtenheld@astaro.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <flichtenheld@astaro.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix off-by-one in read_tree_recursive
Found by valgrind.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Found by valgrind.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
checkout branch: prime cache-tree fully
When switching to another branch, the earlier code relied on incremental
invalidation of cache-tree entries to degrade it. While it is not wrong
per-se, we know that the resulting index must fully match the branch we
are switching to unless the -m (merge) option is used.
We should simply fully re-prime the cache-tree using the new tree object
in such a case. And for safety, invalidate the cache-tree as a whole in
other cases.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When switching to another branch, the earlier code relied on incremental
invalidation of cache-tree entries to degrade it. While it is not wrong
per-se, we know that the resulting index must fully match the branch we
are switching to unless the -m (merge) option is used.
We should simply fully re-prime the cache-tree using the new tree object
in such a case. And for safety, invalidate the cache-tree as a whole in
other cases.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
read-tree -m A B: prime cache-tree from the switched-to tree
When switching to a new branch with "read-tree -m A B", the resulting
index must match tree B and we can prime the cache tree with it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When switching to a new branch with "read-tree -m A B", the resulting
index must match tree B and we can prime the cache tree with it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Move prime_cache_tree() to cache-tree.c
The interface to build cache-tree belongs there.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The interface to build cache-tree belongs there.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
read-tree A B: do not corrupt cache-tree
An earlier commit aab3b9a (read-tree A B C: do not create a bogus index
and do not segfault, 2009-03-12) resurrected the support for an obscure
(but useful) feature to read and overlay more than one tree into the index
without the -m (merge) option. But the fix was not enough.
Exercising this feature exposes a longstanding bug in the code that primes
the cache-tree in the index from the tree that was read. The intention
was that when we know that the index must exactly match the tree we just
read, we prime the entire cache-tree with it.
However, the logic to detect that case incorrectly triggered if you read
two trees without -m. This resulted in a corrupted cache-tree, and
write-tree would have produced an incorrect tree object out of such an
index.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An earlier commit aab3b9a (read-tree A B C: do not create a bogus index
and do not segfault, 2009-03-12) resurrected the support for an obscure
(but useful) feature to read and overlay more than one tree into the index
without the -m (merge) option. But the fix was not enough.
Exercising this feature exposes a longstanding bug in the code that primes
the cache-tree in the index from the tree that was read. The intention
was that when we know that the index must exactly match the tree we just
read, we prime the entire cache-tree with it.
However, the logic to detect that case incorrectly triggered if you read
two trees without -m. This resulted in a corrupted cache-tree, and
write-tree would have produced an incorrect tree object out of such an
index.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git add -p: add missing "q" to patch prompt
Commit cbd3a01 added a new "q" subcommand to the "git add -p"
command loop, but forgot to add it to the prompt.
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit cbd3a01 added a new "q" subcommand to the "git add -p"
command loop, but forgot to add it to the prompt.
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GIT 1.6.2.4
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Makefile: remove {fetch,send}-pack from PROGRAMS as they are builtins
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'ef/maint-fast-export' into maint
* ef/maint-fast-export:
builtin-fast-export.c: handle nested tags
builtin-fast-export.c: fix crash on tagged trees
builtin-fast-export.c: turn error into warning
test-suite: adding a test for fast-export with tag variants
* ef/maint-fast-export:
builtin-fast-export.c: handle nested tags
builtin-fast-export.c: fix crash on tagged trees
builtin-fast-export.c: turn error into warning
test-suite: adding a test for fast-export with tag variants
Merge branch 'mm/maint-add-p-quit' into maint
* mm/maint-add-p-quit:
Update git-add.txt according to the new possibilities of 'git add -p'.
add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handling
git add -p: new "quit" command at the prompt.
* mm/maint-add-p-quit:
Update git-add.txt according to the new possibilities of 'git add -p'.
add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handling
git add -p: new "quit" command at the prompt.
Merge branch 'lt/maint-reflog-expire' into maint
* lt/maint-reflog-expire:
Speed up reflog pruning of unreachable commits
Clean up reflog unreachability pruning decision
* lt/maint-reflog-expire:
Speed up reflog pruning of unreachable commits
Clean up reflog unreachability pruning decision
Merge branch 'jc/maint-shared-literally' into maint
* jc/maint-shared-literally:
Update docs on behaviour of 'core.sharedRepository' and 'git init --shared'
t1301-shared-repo: fix forced modes test
* jc/maint-shared-literally:
Update docs on behaviour of 'core.sharedRepository' and 'git init --shared'
t1301-shared-repo: fix forced modes test
Update git-add.txt according to the new possibilities of 'git add -p'.
The text is merely cut-and-pasted from git-add--interactive.perl. The
cut-and-paste also fixes a typo.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The text is merely cut-and-pasted from git-add--interactive.perl. The
cut-and-paste also fixes a typo.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handling
The original implementation considered the mode separately
from the rest of the hunks, asking about it outside the main
hunk-selection loop. This patch instead places a mode change
as the first hunk in the loop. This has two advantages:
1. less duplicated code (since we use the main selection
loop). This also cleans up an inconsistency, which is
that the main selection loop separates options with a
comma, whereas the mode prompt used slashes.
2. users can now skip the mode change and come back to it,
search for it (via "/mode"), etc, as they can with other
hunks.
To facilitate this, each hunk is now marked with a "type".
Mode hunks are not considered for splitting (which would
make no sense, and also confuses the split_hunk function),
nor are they editable. In theory, one could edit the mode
lines and change to a new mode. In practice, there are only
two modes that git cares about (0644 and 0755), so either
you want to move from one to the other or not (and you can
do that by staging or not staging).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The original implementation considered the mode separately
from the rest of the hunks, asking about it outside the main
hunk-selection loop. This patch instead places a mode change
as the first hunk in the loop. This has two advantages:
1. less duplicated code (since we use the main selection
loop). This also cleans up an inconsistency, which is
that the main selection loop separates options with a
comma, whereas the mode prompt used slashes.
2. users can now skip the mode change and come back to it,
search for it (via "/mode"), etc, as they can with other
hunks.
To facilitate this, each hunk is now marked with a "type".
Mode hunks are not considered for splitting (which would
make no sense, and also confuses the split_hunk function),
nor are they editable. In theory, one could edit the mode
lines and change to a new mode. In practice, there are only
two modes that git cares about (0644 and 0755), so either
you want to move from one to the other or not (and you can
do that by staging or not staging).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git add -p: new "quit" command at the prompt.
There's already 'd' to stop staging hunks in a file, but no explicit
command to stop the interactive staging (for the current files and the
remaining ones). Of course you can do 'd' and then ^C, but it would be
more intuitive to allow 'quit' action.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's already 'd' to stop staging hunks in a file, but no explicit
command to stop the interactive staging (for the current files and the
remaining ones). Of course you can do 'd' and then ^C, but it would be
more intuitive to allow 'quit' action.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Speed up reflog pruning of unreachable commits
Instead of doing the (potentially very expensive) "in_merge_base()"
check for each commit that might be pruned if it is unreachable, do a
preparatory reachability graph of the commit space, so that the common
case of being reachable can be tested directly.
[ Cleaned up a bit and tweaked to actually work. - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of doing the (potentially very expensive) "in_merge_base()"
check for each commit that might be pruned if it is unreachable, do a
preparatory reachability graph of the commit space, so that the common
case of being reachable can be tested directly.
[ Cleaned up a bit and tweaked to actually work. - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Clean up reflog unreachability pruning decision
This clarifies the pruning rules for unreachable commits by having a
separate helpder function for the unreachability decision.
It's preparation for actual bigger changes to come to speed up the
decision when the reachability calculations become a bottleneck.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This clarifies the pruning rules for unreachable commits by having a
separate helpder function for the unreachability decision.
It's preparation for actual bigger changes to come to speed up the
decision when the reachability calculations become a bottleneck.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin-fast-export.c: handle nested tags
When tags that points to tags are passed to fast-export, an error is given,
saying "Tag [TAGNAME] points nowhere?". This fix calls parse_object() on the
object before referencing it's tag, to ensure the tag-info is fully initialized.
In addition, it inserts a comment to point out where nested tags are handled.
This is consistent with the comment for signed tags.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When tags that points to tags are passed to fast-export, an error is given,
saying "Tag [TAGNAME] points nowhere?". This fix calls parse_object() on the
object before referencing it's tag, to ensure the tag-info is fully initialized.
In addition, it inserts a comment to point out where nested tags are handled.
This is consistent with the comment for signed tags.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin-fast-export.c: fix crash on tagged trees
If a tag object points to a tree (or another unhandled type), the commit-
pointer is left uninitialized and later dereferenced. This patch adds a
default case to the switch that issues a warning and skips the object.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a tag object points to a tree (or another unhandled type), the commit-
pointer is left uninitialized and later dereferenced. This patch adds a
default case to the switch that issues a warning and skips the object.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin-fast-export.c: turn error into warning
fast-import doesn't have a syntax to support tree-objects (and some other
object-types), so fast-export shouldn't handle them. However, aborting the
operation is a bit drastic. This patch turns the error into a warning instead.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
fast-import doesn't have a syntax to support tree-objects (and some other
object-types), so fast-export shouldn't handle them. However, aborting the
operation is a bit drastic. This patch turns the error into a warning instead.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
test-suite: adding a test for fast-export with tag variants
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Describe fixes since 1.6.2.3
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.1' into maint
* maint-1.6.1:
* maint-1.6.1:
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maint-1.6.1
* maint-1.6.0:
doc/git-daemon: add missing arguments to options
init: Do not segfault on big GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR environment variable
* maint-1.6.0:
doc/git-daemon: add missing arguments to options
init: Do not segfault on big GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR environment variable
Merge branch 'bs/maint-1.6.0-tree-walk-prefix' into maint
* bs/maint-1.6.0-tree-walk-prefix:
match_tree_entry(): a pathspec only matches at directory boundaries
tree_entry_interesting: a pathspec only matches at directory boundary
* bs/maint-1.6.0-tree-walk-prefix:
match_tree_entry(): a pathspec only matches at directory boundaries
tree_entry_interesting: a pathspec only matches at directory boundary
Merge branch 'js/maint-submodule-checkout' into maint
* js/maint-submodule-checkout:
Fix 'git checkout <submodule>' to update the index
* js/maint-submodule-checkout:
Fix 'git checkout <submodule>' to update the index
Merge branch 'cb/maint-merge-recursive-submodule-fix' into maint
* cb/maint-merge-recursive-submodule-fix:
simplify output of conflicting merge
update cache for conflicting submodule entries
add tests for merging with submodules
* cb/maint-merge-recursive-submodule-fix:
simplify output of conflicting merge
update cache for conflicting submodule entries
add tests for merging with submodules
doc/git-daemon: add missing arguments to max-connections option
Signed-off-by: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maint
* maint-1.6.0:
doc/git-daemon: add missing arguments to options
init: Do not segfault on big GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR environment variable
* maint-1.6.0:
doc/git-daemon: add missing arguments to options
init: Do not segfault on big GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR environment variable
doc/git-daemon: add missing arguments to options
Also fix some spellings and typos.
Signed-off-by: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also fix some spellings and typos.
Signed-off-by: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
init: Do not segfault on big GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR environment variable
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <flichtenheld@astaro.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <flichtenheld@astaro.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
imap-send: use correct configuration variable in documentation
It's imap.pass (not imap.password).
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's imap.pass (not imap.password).
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update docs on behaviour of 'core.sharedRepository' and 'git init --shared'
This documentation update is needed to reflect the recent changes where
"core.sharedRepository = 0mode" was changed to set, not loosen, the
repository permissions.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This documentation update is needed to reflect the recent changes where
"core.sharedRepository = 0mode" was changed to set, not loosen, the
repository permissions.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
doc/gitattributes: clarify location of config text
The gitattributes documentation has a section on the "diff"
attribute, with subsections for each of the things you might
want to configure in your diff config section (external
diff, hunk headers, etc). The first such subsection
specifically notes that the definition of the diff driver
should go into $GIT_DIR/config, but subsequent sections do
not.
This location is implied if you are reading the
documentation sequentially, but it is not uncommon for a new
user to jump to (or be referred to) a specific section. For
a new user who does not know git well enough to recognize
the config syntax, it is not clear that those directives
don't also go into the gitattributes file.
This patch just mentions the config file in each subsection,
similar to the way it is mentioned in the first.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The gitattributes documentation has a section on the "diff"
attribute, with subsections for each of the things you might
want to configure in your diff config section (external
diff, hunk headers, etc). The first such subsection
specifically notes that the definition of the diff driver
should go into $GIT_DIR/config, but subsequent sections do
not.
This location is implied if you are reading the
documentation sequentially, but it is not uncommon for a new
user to jump to (or be referred to) a specific section. For
a new user who does not know git well enough to recognize
the config syntax, it is not clear that those directives
don't also go into the gitattributes file.
This patch just mentions the config file in each subsection,
similar to the way it is mentioned in the first.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.1' into maint
* maint-1.6.1:
Fix buffer overflow in config parser
* maint-1.6.1:
Fix buffer overflow in config parser
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maint-1.6.1
* maint-1.6.0:
Fix buffer overflow in config parser
* maint-1.6.0:
Fix buffer overflow in config parser
Fix buffer overflow in config parser
When interpreting a config value, the config parser reads in 1+ space
character(s) and puts -one- space character in the buffer as soon as
the first non-space character is encountered (if not inside quotes).
Unfortunately the buffer size check lacks the extra space character
which gets inserted at the next non-space character, resulting in
a crash with a specially crafted config entry.
The unit test now uses Java to compile a platform independent
.NET framework to output the test string in C# :o)
Read: Thanks to Johannes Sixt for the correct printf call
which replaces the perl invocation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When interpreting a config value, the config parser reads in 1+ space
character(s) and puts -one- space character in the buffer as soon as
the first non-space character is encountered (if not inside quotes).
Unfortunately the buffer size check lacks the extra space character
which gets inserted at the next non-space character, resulting in
a crash with a specially crafted config entry.
The unit test now uses Java to compile a platform independent
.NET framework to output the test string in C# :o)
Read: Thanks to Johannes Sixt for the correct printf call
which replaces the perl invocation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-apply: fix option description
Do not use non ASCII single quote.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Do not use non ASCII single quote.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
show_object(): push path_name() call further down
In particular, pushing the "path_name()" call _into_ the show() function
would seem to allow
- more clarity into who "owns" the name (ie now when we free the name in
the show_object callback, it's because we generated it ourselves by
calling path_name())
- not calling path_name() at all, either because we don't care about the
name in the first place, or because we are actually happy walking the
linked list of "struct name_path *" and the last component.
Now, I didn't do that latter optimization, because it would require some
more coding, but especially looking at "builtin-pack-objects.c", we really
don't even want the whole pathname, we really would be better off with the
list of path components.
Why? We use that name for two things:
- add_preferred_base_object(), which actually _wants_ to traverse the
path, and now does it by looking for '/' characters!
- for 'name_hash()', which only cares about the last 16 characters of a
name, so again, generating the full name seems to be just unnecessary
work.
Anyway, so I didn't look any closer at those things, but it did convince
me that the "show_object()" calling convention was crazy, and we're
actually better off doing _less_ in list-objects.c, and giving people
access to the internal data structures so that they can decide whether
they want to generate a path-name or not.
This patch does that, and then for people who did use the name (even if
they might do something more clever in the future), it just does the
straightforward "name = path_name(path, component); .. free(name);" thing.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In particular, pushing the "path_name()" call _into_ the show() function
would seem to allow
- more clarity into who "owns" the name (ie now when we free the name in
the show_object callback, it's because we generated it ourselves by
calling path_name())
- not calling path_name() at all, either because we don't care about the
name in the first place, or because we are actually happy walking the
linked list of "struct name_path *" and the last component.
Now, I didn't do that latter optimization, because it would require some
more coding, but especially looking at "builtin-pack-objects.c", we really
don't even want the whole pathname, we really would be better off with the
list of path components.
Why? We use that name for two things:
- add_preferred_base_object(), which actually _wants_ to traverse the
path, and now does it by looking for '/' characters!
- for 'name_hash()', which only cares about the last 16 characters of a
name, so again, generating the full name seems to be just unnecessary
work.
Anyway, so I didn't look any closer at those things, but it did convince
me that the "show_object()" calling convention was crazy, and we're
actually better off doing _less_ in list-objects.c, and giving people
access to the internal data structures so that they can decide whether
they want to generate a path-name or not.
This patch does that, and then for people who did use the name (even if
they might do something more clever in the future), it just does the
straightforward "name = path_name(path, component); .. free(name);" thing.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
process_{tree,blob}: show objects without buffering
Here's a less trivial thing, and slightly more dubious one.
I was looking at that "struct object_array objects", and wondering why we
do that. I have honestly totally forgotten. Why not just call the "show()"
function as we encounter the objects? Rather than add the objects to the
object_array, and then at the very end going through the array and doing a
'show' on all, just do things more incrementally.
Now, there are possible downsides to this:
- the "buffer using object_array" _can_ in theory result in at least
better I-cache usage (two tight loops rather than one more spread out
one). I don't think this is a real issue, but in theory..
- this _does_ change the order of the objects printed. Instead of doing a
"process_tree(revs, commit->tree, &objects, NULL, "");" in the loop
over the commits (which puts all the root trees _first_ in the object
list, this patch just adds them to the list of pending objects, and
then we'll traverse them in that order (and thus show each root tree
object together with the objects we discover under it)
I _think_ the new ordering actually makes more sense, but the object
ordering is actually a subtle thing when it comes to packing
efficiency, so any change in order is going to have implications for
packing. Good or bad, I dunno.
- There may be some reason why we did it that odd way with the object
array, that I have simply forgotten.
Anyway, now that we don't buffer up the objects before showing them
that may actually result in lower memory usage during that whole
traverse_commit_list() phase.
This is seriously not very deeply tested. It makes sense to me, it seems
to pass all the tests, it looks ok, but...
Does anybody remember why we did that "object_array" thing? It used to be
an "object_list" a long long time ago, but got changed into the array due
to better memory usage patterns (those linked lists of obejcts are
horrible from a memory allocation standpoint). But I wonder why we didn't
do this back then. Maybe there's a reason for it.
Or maybe there _used_ to be a reason, and no longer is.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Here's a less trivial thing, and slightly more dubious one.
I was looking at that "struct object_array objects", and wondering why we
do that. I have honestly totally forgotten. Why not just call the "show()"
function as we encounter the objects? Rather than add the objects to the
object_array, and then at the very end going through the array and doing a
'show' on all, just do things more incrementally.
Now, there are possible downsides to this:
- the "buffer using object_array" _can_ in theory result in at least
better I-cache usage (two tight loops rather than one more spread out
one). I don't think this is a real issue, but in theory..
- this _does_ change the order of the objects printed. Instead of doing a
"process_tree(revs, commit->tree, &objects, NULL, "");" in the loop
over the commits (which puts all the root trees _first_ in the object
list, this patch just adds them to the list of pending objects, and
then we'll traverse them in that order (and thus show each root tree
object together with the objects we discover under it)
I _think_ the new ordering actually makes more sense, but the object
ordering is actually a subtle thing when it comes to packing
efficiency, so any change in order is going to have implications for
packing. Good or bad, I dunno.
- There may be some reason why we did it that odd way with the object
array, that I have simply forgotten.
Anyway, now that we don't buffer up the objects before showing them
that may actually result in lower memory usage during that whole
traverse_commit_list() phase.
This is seriously not very deeply tested. It makes sense to me, it seems
to pass all the tests, it looks ok, but...
Does anybody remember why we did that "object_array" thing? It used to be
an "object_list" a long long time ago, but got changed into the array due
to better memory usage patterns (those linked lists of obejcts are
horrible from a memory allocation standpoint). But I wonder why we didn't
do this back then. Maybe there's a reason for it.
Or maybe there _used_ to be a reason, and no longer is.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GIT 1.6.2.3
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.1' into maint
* maint-1.6.1:
State the effect of filter-branch on graft explicitly
process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls
* maint-1.6.1:
State the effect of filter-branch on graft explicitly
process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maint-1.6.1
* maint-1.6.0:
State the effect of filter-branch on graft explicitly
process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls
* maint-1.6.0:
State the effect of filter-branch on graft explicitly
process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls
State the effect of filter-branch on graft explicitly
Signed-off-by: Daniel Cheng (aka SDiZ) <j16sdiz+freenet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Cheng (aka SDiZ) <j16sdiz+freenet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
>
> The name of the processed object was duplicated for passing it to
> add_object(), but that already calls path_name, which allocates a new
> string anyway. So the memory allocated by the xstrdup calls just went
> nowhere, leaking memory.
Ack, ack.
There's another easy 5% or so for the built-in object walker: once we've
created the hash from the name, the name isn't interesting any more, and
so something trivial like this can help a bit.
Does it matter? Probably not on its own. But a few more memory saving
tricks and it might all make a difference.
Linus
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
>
> The name of the processed object was duplicated for passing it to
> add_object(), but that already calls path_name, which allocates a new
> string anyway. So the memory allocated by the xstrdup calls just went
> nowhere, leaking memory.
Ack, ack.
There's another easy 5% or so for the built-in object walker: once we've
created the hash from the name, the name isn't interesting any more, and
so something trivial like this can help a bit.
Does it matter? Probably not on its own. But a few more memory saving
tricks and it might all make a difference.
Linus
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t1301-shared-repo: fix forced modes test
This test was added recently (5a688fe, "core.sharedrepository = 0mode"
should set, not loosen; 2009-03-28). It checked the result of a sed
invocation for emptyness, but in some cases it forgot to print anything
at all, so that those checks would never be false.
Due to this mistake, it went unnoticed that the files in objects/info are
not necessarily 0440, but can also be 0660. Because the 0mode setting
tries to guarantee that the files are accessible only to the people they
are meant to be used by, we should only make sure that they are readable
by the user and the group when the configuration is set to 0660. It is a
separate matter from the core.shredrepository settings that w-bit from
immutable object files under objects/[0-9a-f][0-9a-f] directories should
be dropped.
COMMIT_EDITMSG is still world-readable, but it (and any transient files
that are meant for repositories with a work tree) does not matter. If you
are working on a shared machine and on a sekrit stuff, the root of the
work tree would be with mode 0700 (or 0750 to allow peeking by other
people in the group), and that would mean that .git/COMMIT_EDITMSG in such
a repository would not be readable by the strangers anyway.
Also, in the real-world use case, .git/COMMIT_EDITMSG will be given to an
arbitrary editor the user happens to use, and we have no guarantee what it
does (e.g. it may create a new file with umask and replace, it may rewrite
in place, it may leave an editor backup file but use umask to create it,
etc.), and the protection of the file lies majorly on the protection of
the root of the work tree.
This test cannot be run on Windows; it requires POSIXPERM when merged to
'master'.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test was added recently (5a688fe, "core.sharedrepository = 0mode"
should set, not loosen; 2009-03-28). It checked the result of a sed
invocation for emptyness, but in some cases it forgot to print anything
at all, so that those checks would never be false.
Due to this mistake, it went unnoticed that the files in objects/info are
not necessarily 0440, but can also be 0660. Because the 0mode setting
tries to guarantee that the files are accessible only to the people they
are meant to be used by, we should only make sure that they are readable
by the user and the group when the configuration is set to 0660. It is a
separate matter from the core.shredrepository settings that w-bit from
immutable object files under objects/[0-9a-f][0-9a-f] directories should
be dropped.
COMMIT_EDITMSG is still world-readable, but it (and any transient files
that are meant for repositories with a work tree) does not matter. If you
are working on a shared machine and on a sekrit stuff, the root of the
work tree would be with mode 0700 (or 0750 to allow peeking by other
people in the group), and that would mean that .git/COMMIT_EDITMSG in such
a repository would not be readable by the strangers anyway.
Also, in the real-world use case, .git/COMMIT_EDITMSG will be given to an
arbitrary editor the user happens to use, and we have no guarantee what it
does (e.g. it may create a new file with umask and replace, it may rewrite
in place, it may leave an editor backup file but use umask to create it,
etc.), and the protection of the file lies majorly on the protection of
the root of the work tree.
This test cannot be run on Windows; it requires POSIXPERM when merged to
'master'.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Start 1.6.2.3 preparation
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'jc/shared-literally' into maint
* jc/shared-literally:
t1301: loosen test for forced modes
set_shared_perm(): sometimes we know what the final mode bits should look like
move_temp_to_file(): do not forget to chmod() in "Coda hack" codepath
Move chmod(foo, 0444) into move_temp_to_file()
"core.sharedrepository = 0mode" should set, not loosen
* jc/shared-literally:
t1301: loosen test for forced modes
set_shared_perm(): sometimes we know what the final mode bits should look like
move_temp_to_file(): do not forget to chmod() in "Coda hack" codepath
Move chmod(foo, 0444) into move_temp_to_file()
"core.sharedrepository = 0mode" should set, not loosen
Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-diff-borrow-carefully' into maint
* jc/maint-1.6.0-diff-borrow-carefully:
diff --cached: do not borrow from a work tree when a path is marked as assume-unchanged
* jc/maint-1.6.0-diff-borrow-carefully:
diff --cached: do not borrow from a work tree when a path is marked as assume-unchanged
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.1' into maint
* maint-1.6.1:
process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls
* maint-1.6.1:
process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maint-1.6.1
* maint-1.6.0:
process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls
* maint-1.6.0:
process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls
Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack' into maint
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack:
pack-objects: don't loosen objects available in alternate or kept packs
t7700: demonstrate repack flaw which may loosen objects unnecessarily
Remove --kept-pack-only option and associated infrastructure
pack-objects: only repack or loosen objects residing in "local" packs
git-repack.sh: don't use --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects
t7700-repack: add two new tests demonstrating repacking flaws
is_kept_pack(): final clean-up
Simplify is_kept_pack()
Consolidate ignore_packed logic more
has_sha1_kept_pack(): take "struct rev_info"
has_sha1_pack(): refactor "pretend these packs do not exist" interface
git-repack: resist stray environment variable
Conflicts:
t/t7700-repack.sh
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack:
pack-objects: don't loosen objects available in alternate or kept packs
t7700: demonstrate repack flaw which may loosen objects unnecessarily
Remove --kept-pack-only option and associated infrastructure
pack-objects: only repack or loosen objects residing in "local" packs
git-repack.sh: don't use --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects
t7700-repack: add two new tests demonstrating repacking flaws
is_kept_pack(): final clean-up
Simplify is_kept_pack()
Consolidate ignore_packed logic more
has_sha1_kept_pack(): take "struct rev_info"
has_sha1_pack(): refactor "pretend these packs do not exist" interface
git-repack: resist stray environment variable
Conflicts:
t/t7700-repack.sh
Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-blame-s' into maint-1.6.1
* jc/maint-1.6.0-blame-s:
blame: read custom grafts given by -S before calling setup_revisions()
Conflicts:
builtin-blame.c
* jc/maint-1.6.0-blame-s:
blame: read custom grafts given by -S before calling setup_revisions()
Conflicts:
builtin-blame.c
Merge branch 'bc/maint-1.6.1-branch-deleted-was' into maint-1.6.1
* bc/maint-1.6.1-branch-deleted-was:
git-branch: display "was sha1" on branch deletion rather than just "sha1"
* bc/maint-1.6.1-branch-deleted-was:
git-branch: display "was sha1" on branch deletion rather than just "sha1"
Merge branch 'js/maint-1.6.0-exec-path-env' into maint-1.6.1
* js/maint-1.6.0-exec-path-env:
Propagate --exec-path setting to external commands via GIT_EXEC_PATH
* js/maint-1.6.0-exec-path-env:
Propagate --exec-path setting to external commands via GIT_EXEC_PATH
Merge branch 'tr/maint-1.6.1-doc-format-patch--root' into maint-1.6.1
* tr/maint-1.6.1-doc-format-patch--root:
Documentation: format-patch --root clarifications
* tr/maint-1.6.1-doc-format-patch--root:
Documentation: format-patch --root clarifications
process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls
The name of the processed object was duplicated for passing it to
add_object(), but that already calls path_name, which allocates a new
string anyway. So the memory allocated by the xstrdup calls just went
nowhere, leaking memory.
This reduces the RSS usage for a "rev-list --all --objects" by about 10% on
the gentoo repo (fully packed) as well as linux-2.6.git:
gentoo:
| old | new
----------------|-------------------------------
RSS | 1537284 | 1388408
VSZ | 1816852 | 1667952
time elapsed | 1:49.62 | 1:48.99
min. page faults| 417178 | 379919
linux-2.6.git:
| old | new
----------------|-------------------------------
RSS | 324452 | 292996
VSZ | 491792 | 460376
time elapsed | 0:14.53 | 0:14.28
min. page faults| 89360 | 81613
Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The name of the processed object was duplicated for passing it to
add_object(), but that already calls path_name, which allocates a new
string anyway. So the memory allocated by the xstrdup calls just went
nowhere, leaking memory.
This reduces the RSS usage for a "rev-list --all --objects" by about 10% on
the gentoo repo (fully packed) as well as linux-2.6.git:
gentoo:
| old | new
----------------|-------------------------------
RSS | 1537284 | 1388408
VSZ | 1816852 | 1667952
time elapsed | 1:49.62 | 1:48.99
min. page faults| 417178 | 379919
linux-2.6.git:
| old | new
----------------|-------------------------------
RSS | 324452 | 292996
VSZ | 491792 | 460376
time elapsed | 0:14.53 | 0:14.28
min. page faults| 89360 | 81613
Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-pull.sh: better warning message for "git pull" on detached head.
Otherwise, git complains about not finding a branch to pull from in
'branch..merge', which is hardly understandable. While we're there,
reword the sentences slightly.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise, git complains about not finding a branch to pull from in
'branch..merge', which is hardly understandable. While we're there,
reword the sentences slightly.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.1' into maint
* maint-1.6.1:
Documentation: clarify .gitattributes search
git-checkout.txt: clarify that <branch> applies when no path is given.
git-checkout.txt: fix incorrect statement about HEAD and index
* maint-1.6.1:
Documentation: clarify .gitattributes search
git-checkout.txt: clarify that <branch> applies when no path is given.
git-checkout.txt: fix incorrect statement about HEAD and index
Change double quotes to single quotes in message
Most of the time when we give branch name in the message, we quote it
inside a pair of single-quotes. git-checkout uses double-quotes; this
patch corrects the inconsistency.
Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most of the time when we give branch name in the message, we quote it
inside a pair of single-quotes. git-checkout uses double-quotes; this
patch corrects the inconsistency.
Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maint-1.6.1
* maint-1.6.0:
Documentation: clarify .gitattributes search
git-checkout.txt: clarify that <branch> applies when no path is given.
git-checkout.txt: fix incorrect statement about HEAD and index
* maint-1.6.0:
Documentation: clarify .gitattributes search
git-checkout.txt: clarify that <branch> applies when no path is given.
git-checkout.txt: fix incorrect statement about HEAD and index
Documentation: clarify .gitattributes search
Use the term "toplevel of the work tree" in gitattributes.txt and
gitignore.txt to define the limits of the search for those files.
Signed-off-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the term "toplevel of the work tree" in gitattributes.txt and
gitignore.txt to define the limits of the search for those files.
Signed-off-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-checkout.txt: clarify that <branch> applies when no path is given.
Otherwise, the sentence "Defaults to HEAD." can be mis-read to mean
that "git checkout -- hello.c" checks-out from HEAD.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise, the sentence "Defaults to HEAD." can be mis-read to mean
that "git checkout -- hello.c" checks-out from HEAD.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-checkout.txt: fix incorrect statement about HEAD and index
The command "git checkout" checks out from the index by default, not
HEAD (the introducing comment were correct, but the detailled
explanation added below were not).
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The command "git checkout" checks out from the index by default, not
HEAD (the introducing comment were correct, but the detailled
explanation added below were not).
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git submodule: fix usage line
Actually, you have to set the -b option after the add command.
Signed-off-by: Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.info>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Actually, you have to set the -b option after the add command.
Signed-off-by: Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.info>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.1' into maint
* maint-1.6.1:
commit: abort commit if interactive add failed
git-repack: use non-dashed update-server-info
* maint-1.6.1:
commit: abort commit if interactive add failed
git-repack: use non-dashed update-server-info
Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maint-1.6.1
* maint-1.6.0:
commit: abort commit if interactive add failed
git-repack: use non-dashed update-server-info
Conflicts:
builtin-commit.c
* maint-1.6.0:
commit: abort commit if interactive add failed
git-repack: use non-dashed update-server-info
Conflicts:
builtin-commit.c
doc/git-pack-refs: fix two grammar issues
Signed-off-by: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
commit: abort commit if interactive add failed
Previously we ignored the result of calling add_interactive,
which meant that if an error occurred we simply committed
whatever happened to be in the index.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously we ignored the result of calling add_interactive,
which meant that if an error occurred we simply committed
whatever happened to be in the index.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
simplify output of conflicting merge
This simplifies the code without changing the semantics and removes
the unhelpful "needs $sha1" part of the conflicting submodule message.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This simplifies the code without changing the semantics and removes
the unhelpful "needs $sha1" part of the conflicting submodule message.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
update cache for conflicting submodule entries
When merging merge bases during a recursive merge we do not want to
leave any unmerged entries. Otherwise we cannot create a temporary
tree for the recursive merge to work with.
We failed to do so in case of a submodule conflict between merge
bases, causing a NULL pointer dereference in the next step of the
recursive merge.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When merging merge bases during a recursive merge we do not want to
leave any unmerged entries. Otherwise we cannot create a temporary
tree for the recursive merge to work with.
We failed to do so in case of a submodule conflict between merge
bases, causing a NULL pointer dereference in the next step of the
recursive merge.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
add tests for merging with submodules
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>