Avoid gcc warnings in sha1_file.c
A couple of bogus "might be used undefined" warnings are avoided
by moving the initializations unnecessarily early.
A couple of bogus "might be used undefined" warnings are avoided
by moving the initializations unnecessarily early.
Generalize the "show each ref" code in receice-pack
This turns it into a generic "do xyz for each ref" library function.
This turns it into a generic "do xyz for each ref" library function.
[PATCH] Show more details of packfile with verify-pack -v.
This implements show_pack_info() function used in verify-pack
command when -v flag is used to obtain something like
unpack-objects used to give when it was first written.
It shows the following for each non-deltified object found in
the pack:
SHA1 type size offset
For deltified objects, it shows this instead:
SHA1 type size offset depth base_sha1
In order to get the output in the order that appear in the pack
file for debugging purposes, you can do this:
$ git-verify-pack -v packfile | sort -n -k 4,4
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This implements show_pack_info() function used in verify-pack
command when -v flag is used to obtain something like
unpack-objects used to give when it was first written.
It shows the following for each non-deltified object found in
the pack:
SHA1 type size offset
For deltified objects, it shows this instead:
SHA1 type size offset depth base_sha1
In order to get the output in the order that appear in the pack
file for debugging purposes, you can do this:
$ git-verify-pack -v packfile | sort -n -k 4,4
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] verify-pack updates.
Nico pointed out that having verify_pack.c and verify-pack.c was
confusing. Rename verify_pack.c to pack-check.c as suggested,
and enhances the verification done quite a bit.
- Built-in sha1_file unpacking knows that a base object of a
deltified object _must_ be in the same pack, and takes
advantage of that fact.
- Earlier verify-pack command only checked the SHA1 sum for the
entire pack file and did not look into its contents. It now
checks everything idx file claims to have unpacks correctly.
- It now has a hook to give more detailed information for
objects contained in the pack under -v flag.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Nico pointed out that having verify_pack.c and verify-pack.c was
confusing. Rename verify_pack.c to pack-check.c as suggested,
and enhances the verification done quite a bit.
- Built-in sha1_file unpacking knows that a base object of a
deltified object _must_ be in the same pack, and takes
advantage of that fact.
- Earlier verify-pack command only checked the SHA1 sum for the
entire pack file and did not look into its contents. It now
checks everything idx file claims to have unpacks correctly.
- It now has a hook to give more detailed information for
objects contained in the pack under -v flag.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Avoid unnecessarily inflating and interpreting delta
This teaches packed_delta_info() that it only needs to look at
the type of the base object to figure out both type and size of
a deltified object. This saves quite a many calls to inflate()
when dealing with a deep delta chain.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This teaches packed_delta_info() that it only needs to look at
the type of the base object to figure out both type and size of
a deltified object. This saves quite a many calls to inflate()
when dealing with a deep delta chain.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Do ref matching on the sender side rather than on receiver
This makes the receiver always send a full list of valid refs, which
will allow us to do better packs, as well as handle creation of new
refs. Eventually. Right now we just moved the matching and enabled it.
So now you can do
git-send-pack host:path branch1 branch2
to only send branches "branch1" and "branch2".
This makes the receiver always send a full list of valid refs, which
will allow us to do better packs, as well as handle creation of new
refs. Eventually. Right now we just moved the matching and enabled it.
So now you can do
git-send-pack host:path branch1 branch2
to only send branches "branch1" and "branch2".
Add support for "forcing" a ref on the remote side
A "old ref" of all zeroes is considered a "don't care" ref, and allows
us to say "write the new ref regardless of what the old ref contained
(or even if it existed at all)".
This allows (if git-send-pack were to do it) creating new refs, and
fixing up old ones.
A "old ref" of all zeroes is considered a "don't care" ref, and allows
us to say "write the new ref regardless of what the old ref contained
(or even if it existed at all)".
This allows (if git-send-pack were to do it) creating new refs, and
fixing up old ones.
git-send-pack: actually send the object pack
This concludes this lesson. I've actually successfully sent an update
using the git-send-pack command.
Probably tons of work still to do, and nasty debugging, but it's now
actually potentially useful.
This concludes this lesson. I've actually successfully sent an update
using the git-send-pack command.
Probably tons of work still to do, and nasty debugging, but it's now
actually potentially useful.
git-receive-pack: implement ref switch command handling
After unpacking the object pack successfully, we go through the list of
refs, and verify that they still contain their expected values. Then we
replace them with the new ones.
After unpacking the object pack successfully, we go through the list of
refs, and verify that they still contain their expected values. Then we
replace them with the new ones.
Add comment on what send-pack still needs to do
Me tired.
Me tired.
git-receive-pack: start parsing ref update commands
We don't act on them yet, but we parse them.
We don't act on them yet, but we parse them.
Slow but steady progress on git pack receive/send
git-send-pack: start parsing local/remote reference differences
Right now it just shows which refs it picks up, and whether they are
the same or changed on the remote end. Getting there..
Right now it just shows which refs it picks up, and whether they are
the same or changed on the remote end. Getting there..
Turn on optimization again
It got turned off by mistake just because I had been doing debugging,
and committed the Makefile that had other changes ...
It got turned off by mistake just because I had been doing debugging,
and committed the Makefile that had other changes ...
[PATCH] Remove unnecessary sort from t6001 testcase
This patch removes an unnecessary sort from the t6001 testcase.
Sorts were previously necessary when testing non --merge-order cases
because the output order wasn't entirely deterministic unless commit
date was fixed.
However, commit dates are now fixed, so the need for a sort has
disappeared. So the sort has been removed.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This patch removes an unnecessary sort from the t6001 testcase.
Sorts were previously necessary when testing non --merge-order cases
because the output order wasn't entirely deterministic unless commit
date was fixed.
However, commit dates are now fixed, so the need for a sort has
disappeared. So the sort has been removed.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Fix broken t6001 test case
This fix fixes a t/t6001 test case break that was hidden by a bug in the
test case infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This fix fixes a t/t6001 test case break that was hidden by a bug in the
test case infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Demonstrate broken t6001 test case function
Junio discovered a problem where an actual test case break was hidden
because pipelines are not handled properly by the test infrastructure in
t6001.
This patch fixes the broken infrastructure (and demonstrates the break
explicitly).
A subsequent patch in this series will fix the test case so that it
doesn't fail.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Junio discovered a problem where an actual test case break was hidden
because pipelines are not handled properly by the test infrastructure in
t6001.
This patch fixes the broken infrastructure (and demonstrates the break
explicitly).
A subsequent patch in this series will fix the test case so that it
doesn't fail.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Fix for git-rev-list --merge-order B ^A (A,B share common base) [rev 2]
This patch makes --merge-order produce the same list as git-rev-list
without --merge-order specified.
In particular, if the graph looks like this:
A
| B
|/
C
|
D
The both git-rev-list B ^A and git-rev-list --merge-order will produce B.
The unit tests have been changed to reflect the fact that the prune
points are now formally part of the start list that is used to perform
the --merge-order sort.
That is: git-rev-list --merge-order A ^D used to produce
= A
| C
It now produces:
^ A
| C
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This patch makes --merge-order produce the same list as git-rev-list
without --merge-order specified.
In particular, if the graph looks like this:
A
| B
|/
C
|
D
The both git-rev-list B ^A and git-rev-list --merge-order will produce B.
The unit tests have been changed to reflect the fact that the prune
points are now formally part of the start list that is used to perform
the --merge-order sort.
That is: git-rev-list --merge-order A ^D used to produce
= A
| C
It now produces:
^ A
| C
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Test case that demonstrates problem with --merge-order ^ processing
Added a test case that shows that --merge-order doesn't produce the
correct result in the following case.
A
|
| B
|/
C
|
D
git-rev-list --merge-order A ^B should produce just A. Instead
it produces BCD.
A subsequent patch will fix this defect.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Added a test case that shows that --merge-order doesn't produce the
correct result in the following case.
A
|
| B
|/
C
|
D
git-rev-list --merge-order A ^B should produce just A. Instead
it produces BCD.
A subsequent patch will fix this defect.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Make send/receive-pack be closer to doing something interesting
Start of "git-send-pack", the local part of sending off a pack
Like git-receive-pack, this is only partway done.
Like git-receive-pack, this is only partway done.
Add first cut at "git-receive-pack"
It's not working yet, but it's at the point where I want to be able to
track my changes. The theory of operation is that this is the "remote"
side of a "git push". It can tell us what references the remote side
has, receives out reference update commands and a pack-file, and can
execute the unpacking command.
It's not working yet, but it's at the point where I want to be able to
track my changes. The theory of operation is that this is the "remote"
side of a "git push". It can tell us what references the remote side
has, receives out reference update commands and a pack-file, and can
execute the unpacking command.
Remove bogus dup commit warning with --merge-order
It makes gitk unhappy, and besides, non-merge-order doesn't complain, so
why do it here..
It makes gitk unhappy, and besides, non-merge-order doesn't complain, so
why do it here..
Teach git-rev-list about non-commit objects
Now you can give git-rev-list tags, trees and blobs, and it will do the
proper reachability for them all. Knock wood.
Of course, you need the "--objects" flag to do anything but plain
commits.
Now you can give git-rev-list tags, trees and blobs, and it will do the
proper reachability for them all. Knock wood.
Of course, you need the "--objects" flag to do anything but plain
commits.
Prepare git-rev-list for tracking tag objects too
We want to be able to just say "give a difference between these
objects", rather than limiting it to commits only. This isn't there
yet, but it sets things up to be a bit easier.
We want to be able to just say "give a difference between these
objects", rather than limiting it to commits only. This isn't there
yet, but it sets things up to be a bit easier.
[PATCH] Adjust t5300 test for unpack-objects change
It now always read from standard input and rejects non-flag
arguments.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
It now always read from standard input and rejects non-flag
arguments.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Re-instate dry-run logic in git-unpack-objects
It can no longer be as verbose, since it doesn't have a good way to
resolve deltas (now that it is purely streaming, it cannot seek around
to read the objects a delta is based on).
But it can check that the thing unpacks cleanly at least as far as pack
syntax goes - all the objects uncompress cleanly, and the pack has the
right final SHA1.
It can no longer be as verbose, since it doesn't have a good way to
resolve deltas (now that it is purely streaming, it cannot seek around
to read the objects a delta is based on).
But it can check that the thing unpacks cleanly at least as far as pack
syntax goes - all the objects uncompress cleanly, and the pack has the
right final SHA1.
Clean up git-unpack-objects a bit
I'd like to add back the "dry-run" thing, but it turns out that to do it
well, I'd have to keep all the object data in memory (which is not
acceptable). So I'll clean it up a bit and make it do as many checks as
it can.
I'd like to add back the "dry-run" thing, but it turns out that to do it
well, I'd have to keep all the object data in memory (which is not
acceptable). So I'll clean it up a bit and make it do as many checks as
it can.
[PATCH] Add git-verify-pack command.
Given a list of <pack>.idx files, this command validates the
index file and the corresponding .pack file for consistency.
This patch also uses the same validation mechanism in fsck-cache
when the --full flag is used.
During normal operation, sha1_file.c verifies that a given .idx
file matches the .pack file by comparing the SHA1 checksum
stored in .idx file and .pack file as a minimum sanity check.
We may further want to check the pack signature and version when
we map the pack, but that would be a separate patch.
Earlier, errors to map a pack file was not flagged fatal but led
to a random fatal error later. This version explicitly die()s
when such an error is detected.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Given a list of <pack>.idx files, this command validates the
index file and the corresponding .pack file for consistency.
This patch also uses the same validation mechanism in fsck-cache
when the --full flag is used.
During normal operation, sha1_file.c verifies that a given .idx
file matches the .pack file by comparing the SHA1 checksum
stored in .idx file and .pack file as a minimum sanity check.
We may further want to check the pack signature and version when
we map the pack, but that would be a separate patch.
Earlier, errors to map a pack file was not flagged fatal but led
to a random fatal error later. This version explicitly die()s
when such an error is detected.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Fixlets on top of Nico's clean-up.
If we prefer 0 as maxsize for diff_delta() to say "unlimited", let's be
consistent about it.
This patch also fixes type mismatch in a call to get_delta_hdr_size()
from packed_delta_info().
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
If we prefer 0 as maxsize for diff_delta() to say "unlimited", let's be
consistent about it.
This patch also fixes type mismatch in a call to get_delta_hdr_size()
from packed_delta_info().
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] assorted delta code cleanup
This is a wrap-up patch including all the cleanups I've done to the
delta code and its usage. The most important change is the
factorization of the delta header handling code.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This is a wrap-up patch including all the cleanups I've done to the
delta code and its usage. The most important change is the
factorization of the delta header handling code.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Fix packed_delta_info() that was broken by the delta header packing change
Pointed out by Junio.
Pointed out by Junio.
Make git pack files use little-endian size encoding
This makes it match the new delta encoding, and admittedly makes the
code easier to follow.
This also updates the PACK file version to 2, since this (and the delta
encoding change in the previous commit) are incompatible with the old
format.
This makes it match the new delta encoding, and admittedly makes the
code easier to follow.
This also updates the PACK file version to 2, since this (and the delta
encoding change in the previous commit) are incompatible with the old
format.
[PATCH] denser delta header encoding
Since the delta data format is not tied to any actual git object
anymore, now is the time to add a small improvement to the delta data
header as it is been done for packed object header. This patch allows
for reducing the delta header of about 2 bytes and makes for simpler
code.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Since the delta data format is not tied to any actual git object
anymore, now is the time to add a small improvement to the delta data
header as it is been done for packed object header. This patch allows
for reducing the delta header of about 2 bytes and makes for simpler
code.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Emit base objects of a delta chain when the delta is output.
Deltas are useless by themselves and when you use them you need to get
to their base objects. A base object should inherit recency from the
most recent deltified object that is based on it and that is what this
patch teaches git-pack-objects.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Deltas are useless by themselves and when you use them you need to get
to their base objects. A base object should inherit recency from the
most recent deltified object that is based on it and that is what this
patch teaches git-pack-objects.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
git-unpack-objects: re-write to read from stdin
It gets a bit more complicated to unpack in a streaming environment, but
here it is. The rewrite is actually a lot cleaner in other ways, it's
just a bit more subtle.
It gets a bit more complicated to unpack in a streaming environment, but
here it is. The rewrite is actually a lot cleaner in other ways, it's
just a bit more subtle.
[PATCH] Use enhanced diff_delta() in the similarity estimator.
The diff_delta() interface was extended to reject generating too big a
delta while we were working on the packed GIT archive format.
Take advantage of that when generating delta in the similarity estimator
used in diffcore-rename.c
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
The diff_delta() interface was extended to reject generating too big a
delta while we were working on the packed GIT archive format.
Take advantage of that when generating delta in the similarity estimator
used in diffcore-rename.c
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Fix unpack-objects for header length information.
Standalone unpack-objects command was not adjusted for header length
encoding change when dealing with deltified entry. This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Standalone unpack-objects command was not adjusted for header length
encoding change when dealing with deltified entry. This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Merge fighting fsck-cache updates from Junio
It's just easier to let git help out with the merge than it is to try to
fix up the diffs.
It's just easier to let git help out with the merge than it is to try to
fix up the diffs.
[PATCH] Update fsck-cache (take 2)
The fsck-cache complains if objects referred to by files in .git/refs/
or objects stored in files under .git/objects/??/ are not found as
stand-alone SHA1 files (i.e. found in alternate object pools
GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES or packed archives stored under
.git/objects/pack).
Although this is a good semantics to maintain consistency of a single
.git/objects directory as a self contained set of objects, it sometimes
is useful to consider it is OK as long as these "outside" objects are
available.
This commit introduces a new flag, --standalone, to git-fsck-cache.
When it is not specified, connectivity checks and .git/refs pointer
checks are taught that it is OK when expected objects do not exist under
.git/objects/?? hierarchy but are available from an packed archive or in
an alternate object pool.
Another new flag, --full, makes git-fsck-cache to check not only the
current GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY but also objects found in alternate object
pools and packed GIT archives.a
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
The fsck-cache complains if objects referred to by files in .git/refs/
or objects stored in files under .git/objects/??/ are not found as
stand-alone SHA1 files (i.e. found in alternate object pools
GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES or packed archives stored under
.git/objects/pack).
Although this is a good semantics to maintain consistency of a single
.git/objects directory as a self contained set of objects, it sometimes
is useful to consider it is OK as long as these "outside" objects are
available.
This commit introduces a new flag, --standalone, to git-fsck-cache.
When it is not specified, connectivity checks and .git/refs pointer
checks are taught that it is OK when expected objects do not exist under
.git/objects/?? hierarchy but are available from an packed archive or in
an alternate object pool.
Another new flag, --full, makes git-fsck-cache to check not only the
current GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY but also objects found in alternate object
pools and packed GIT archives.a
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Expose packed_git and alt_odb.
The commands git-fsck-cache and probably git-*-pull needs to have a way
to enumerate objects contained in packed GIT archives and alternate
object pools. This commit exposes the data structure used to keep track
of them from sha1_file.c, and adds a couple of accessor interface
functions for use by the enhanced git-fsck-cache command.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
The commands git-fsck-cache and probably git-*-pull needs to have a way
to enumerate objects contained in packed GIT archives and alternate
object pools. This commit exposes the data structure used to keep track
of them from sha1_file.c, and adds a couple of accessor interface
functions for use by the enhanced git-fsck-cache command.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Bugfix: initialize pack_base to NULL.
This was causing random segfaults, because use_packed_git() got
confused by random garbage there.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This was causing random segfaults, because use_packed_git() got
confused by random garbage there.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Adjust fsck-cache to packed GIT and alternate object pool.
The fsck-cache complains if objects referred to by files in .git/refs/
or objects stored in files under .git/objects/??/ are not found as
stand-alone SHA1 files (i.e. found in alternate object pools
GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES or packed archives stored under
.git/objects/pack).
Although this is a good semantics to maintain consistency of a single
.git/objects directory as a self contained set of objects, it sometimes
is useful to consider it is OK as long as these "outside" objects are
available.
This commit introduces a new flag, --standalone, to git-fsck-cache.
When it is not specified, connectivity checks and .git/refs pointer
checks are taught that it is OK when expected objects do not exist under
.git/objects/?? hierarchy but are available from an packed archive or in
an alternate object pool.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
The fsck-cache complains if objects referred to by files in .git/refs/
or objects stored in files under .git/objects/??/ are not found as
stand-alone SHA1 files (i.e. found in alternate object pools
GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES or packed archives stored under
.git/objects/pack).
Although this is a good semantics to maintain consistency of a single
.git/objects directory as a self contained set of objects, it sometimes
is useful to consider it is OK as long as these "outside" objects are
available.
This commit introduces a new flag, --standalone, to git-fsck-cache.
When it is not specified, connectivity checks and .git/refs pointer
checks are taught that it is OK when expected objects do not exist under
.git/objects/?? hierarchy but are available from an packed archive or in
an alternate object pool.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Change pack file format. Hopefully for the last time.
This also adds a header with a signature, version info, and the number
of objects to the pack file. It also encodes the file length and type
more efficiently.
This also adds a header with a signature, version info, and the number
of objects to the pack file. It also encodes the file length and type
more efficiently.
git-pack-objects: add "--stdout" flag to write the pack file to stdout
This also suppresses creation of the index file.
This also suppresses creation of the index file.
csum-file: add "sha1fd()" to create a SHA1 csum file from an existing file descriptor
We'll use this soon to write pack-files to stdout.
We'll use this soon to write pack-files to stdout.
Duh. Fix transposed characters in git-pull-script
I'd stupidly only tested the non-branch-name version.
I'd stupidly only tested the non-branch-name version.
Teach packing about "tag" objects
(And teach sha1_file and unpack-object know how to unpack them too, of
course)
(And teach sha1_file and unpack-object know how to unpack them too, of
course)
[PATCH] git-cat-file: '-s' to find out object size.
We use sha1_object_info() now, and getting size is also trivial.
I admit that this is more of "because we can" not "because I see
immediate need for it", though.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
We use sha1_object_info() now, and getting size is also trivial.
I admit that this is more of "because we can" not "because I see
immediate need for it", though.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] git-cat-file: use sha1_object_info() on '-t'.
When trying to find out the type of the object, there is no need
to uncompress the whole object. Just use sha1_object_info().
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
When trying to find out the type of the object, there is no need
to uncompress the whole object. Just use sha1_object_info().
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Obtain sha1_file_info() for deltified pack entry properly.
The initial one was not doing enough to figure things out
without uncompressing too much. It also fixes a potential
segfault resulting from missing use_packed_git() call.
We would need to introduce unuse_packed_git() call and do proper
use counting to figure out when it is safe to unmap, but
currently we do not unmap packed file yet.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
The initial one was not doing enough to figure things out
without uncompressing too much. It also fixes a potential
segfault resulting from missing use_packed_git() call.
We would need to introduce unuse_packed_git() call and do proper
use counting to figure out when it is safe to unmap, but
currently we do not unmap packed file yet.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Teach git-pull-script about pulling tags
Fix another test that broke with the recent git-init-db update
t5300-pack-object.sh test 8 expected to have to create the "pack"
directory itself, and was unhappy when it already existed.
t5300-pack-object.sh test 8 expected to have to create the "pack"
directory itself, and was unhappy when it already existed.
[PATCH] Skip writing out sha1 files for objects in packed git.
Now, there's still a misfeature there, which is that when you
create a new object, it doesn't check whether that object
already exists in the pack-file, so you'll end up with a few
recent objects that you really don't need (notably tree
objects), and this patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Now, there's still a misfeature there, which is that when you
create a new object, it doesn't check whether that object
already exists in the pack-file, so you'll end up with a few
recent objects that you really don't need (notably tree
objects), and this patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] replace sha1sum with sum in t/t1002
This replaces sha1sum(1) with sum(1) in t/t1002. GNU sum(1) runs in
"BSD compatibility" mode by default, and not all systems have GNU
coreutils. On any system without GNU coreutils (or sha1sum) t1002 will
fail. This patch should make t1002 complete successfully everywhere
that sum(1) runs.
I've tested this on Darwin and Linux; it works on both platforms.
Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <mrallen1@yahoo.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This replaces sha1sum(1) with sum(1) in t/t1002. GNU sum(1) runs in
"BSD compatibility" mode by default, and not all systems have GNU
coreutils. On any system without GNU coreutils (or sha1sum) t1002 will
fail. This patch should make t1002 complete successfully everywhere
that sum(1) runs.
I've tested this on Darwin and Linux; it works on both platforms.
Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <mrallen1@yahoo.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Fix up test that counted subdirectories in ".git/objects"
Now there are 257 of them (256 numeric ones, and the new "pack" directory)
Now there are 257 of them (256 numeric ones, and the new "pack" directory)
git-init-db: create "pack" subdirectory under objects
Don't make the user have to mkdir it just because he's excited about the
new object pack functionality, do it for him.
Don't make the user have to mkdir it just because he's excited about the
new object pack functionality, do it for him.
Merge rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/gitk/gitk
csum-file: fix missing buf pointer update
This would create broken pack archives for anything nontrivial.
This would create broken pack archives for anything nontrivial.
[PATCH] Teach read_sha1_file() and friends about packed git object store.
GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY and GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES can
have the "pack" subdirectory that houses "packed GIT" files
produced by git-pack-objects (e.g. .git/objects/pack/foo.pack
and .git/objects/pack/foo.idx; always store them as pairs). The
following functions in sha1_file.c can then read object contents
from such packed file:
- sha1_object_info()
- has_sha1_file()
- read_sha1_file()
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY and GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES can
have the "pack" subdirectory that houses "packed GIT" files
produced by git-pack-objects (e.g. .git/objects/pack/foo.pack
and .git/objects/pack/foo.idx; always store them as pairs). The
following functions in sha1_file.c can then read object contents
from such packed file:
- sha1_object_info()
- has_sha1_file()
- read_sha1_file()
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Enhance sha1_file_size() into sha1_object_info()
This lets us eliminate one use of map_sha1_file() outside
sha1_file.c, to bring us one step closer to the packed GIT.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This lets us eliminate one use of map_sha1_file() outside
sha1_file.c, to bring us one step closer to the packed GIT.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Remove "delta" object representation.
Packed delta files created by git-pack-objects seems to be the
way to go, and existing "delta" object handling code has exposed
the object representation details to too many places. Remove it
while we refactor code to come up with a proper interface in
sha1_file.c.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Packed delta files created by git-pack-objects seems to be the
way to go, and existing "delta" object handling code has exposed
the object representation details to too many places. Remove it
while we refactor code to come up with a proper interface in
sha1_file.c.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] git-ssh-pull: commit-id consistency
In contrast to other plumbing tools, git-ssh-push only
allow a very restrictive form of commit-id filenames.
This patch removes this restriction.
Acked-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Sven Verdoolaege <skimo@kotnet.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
In contrast to other plumbing tools, git-ssh-push only
allow a very restrictive form of commit-id filenames.
This patch removes this restriction.
Acked-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Sven Verdoolaege <skimo@kotnet.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
git-checkout-script: use "--verify --revs-only" to parse revs
Sven Verdoolaege points out that I added the --verify option to
git-rev-parse exactly for things like this, but didn't update the
users.
Sven Verdoolaege points out that I added the --verify option to
git-rev-parse exactly for things like this, but didn't update the
users.
Add a menu item for creating tags.
Fix a bug where we would corrupt the stuff read from git-rev-list.
If we have a very long commit message, and we end up getting a
bufferfull of data from git-rev-list that all belongs to one commit,
we ended up throwing away the data from a previous read that should
have been included. The result was a error message about not being
able to parse the output of git-rev-list.
Also, if the git-rev-list output that we can't parse is long, only put
the first 80 chars in the error message. Otherwise we end up with an
enormous error window.
If we have a very long commit message, and we end up getting a
bufferfull of data from git-rev-list that all belongs to one commit,
we ended up throwing away the data from a previous read that should
have been included. The result was a error message about not being
able to parse the output of git-rev-list.
Also, if the git-rev-list output that we can't parse is long, only put
the first 80 chars in the error message. Otherwise we end up with an
enormous error window.
Add a menu entry for generating a patch between any two commits.
csum-file interface updates: return resulting SHA1
Also, make the writing of the SHA1 as a end-header be conditional: not
every user will necessarily want to write the SHA1 to the file itself,
even though current users do (but we migh end up using the same helper
functions for the object files themselves, that don't do this).
This also makes the packed index file contain the SHA1 of the packed
data file at the end (just before its own SHA1). That way you can
validate the pairing of the two if you want to.
Also, make the writing of the SHA1 as a end-header be conditional: not
every user will necessarily want to write the SHA1 to the file itself,
even though current users do (but we migh end up using the same helper
functions for the object files themselves, that don't do this).
This also makes the packed index file contain the SHA1 of the packed
data file at the end (just before its own SHA1). That way you can
validate the pairing of the two if you want to.
Fix behaviour in the case where we have no commits to display.
I had code in there to put "No commits selected" on the canvas
but it needed some globals.
I had code in there to put "No commits selected" on the canvas
but it needed some globals.
git-pack-objects: write the pack files with a SHA1 csum
We want to be able to check their integrity later, and putting the
sha1-sum of the contents at the end is a good thing. The writing
routines are generic, so we could try to re-use them for the index file,
instead of having the same logic duplicated.
Update unpack-objects to know about the extra 20 bytes at the end
of the index.
We want to be able to check their integrity later, and putting the
sha1-sum of the contents at the end is a good thing. The writing
routines are generic, so we could try to re-use them for the index file,
instead of having the same logic duplicated.
Update unpack-objects to know about the extra 20 bytes at the end
of the index.
Add "--pretty=full" format that also shows committer.
Also move the common implementation of parsing the --pretty argument
format into commit.c rather than having duplicates in diff-tree.c and
rev-list.c.
Also move the common implementation of parsing the --pretty argument
format into commit.c rather than having duplicates in diff-tree.c and
rev-list.c.
Add git-verify-tag script
Here is a script to simplify validating the gpg signature created by
git-tag-script. Might be useful to add to the git tree so that people
don't have to search for the right post in the git mailinglist archives
Here is a script to simplify validating the gpg signature created by
git-tag-script. Might be useful to add to the git tree so that people
don't have to search for the right post in the git mailinglist archives
Check for the existence of the git directory on startup.
Check that $GIT_DIR (or .git, if GIT_DIR is not set) is a directory.
This means we can give a more informative error message if the user
runs gitk somewhere that isn't a git repository.
Check that $GIT_DIR (or .git, if GIT_DIR is not set) is a directory.
This means we can give a more informative error message if the user
runs gitk somewhere that isn't a git repository.
git-pack-objects: use name information (if any) to sort objects for packing.
This is incredibly cheezy. But it's cheap, and it works pretty well.
This is incredibly cheezy. But it's cheap, and it works pretty well.
Ooh. Make git-rev-list --object associate a name with objects.
The name isn't unique, it's just the first name that object is reached
through, so it's really nothing more than a hint.
The name isn't unique, it's just the first name that object is reached
through, so it's really nothing more than a hint.
git-pack-objects: do the delta search in reverse size order
Starting from big objects and going backwards means that we end up
picking a delta that goes from a bigger object to a smaller one. That's
advantageous for two reasons: the bigger object is likely the newer one
(since things tend to grow, rather than shrink), and doing a delete
tends to be smaller than doing an add.
So the deltas don't tend to be top-of-tree, and the packed end result is
just slightly smaller.
Starting from big objects and going backwards means that we end up
picking a delta that goes from a bigger object to a smaller one. That's
advantageous for two reasons: the bigger object is likely the newer one
(since things tend to grow, rather than shrink), and doing a delete
tends to be smaller than doing an add.
So the deltas don't tend to be top-of-tree, and the packed end result is
just slightly smaller.
[PATCH] Add git-relink-script to fix up missing hardlinks
This will scan 2 or more object repositories and look for common objects, check
if they are hardlinked, and replace one with a hardlink to the other if not.
This version warns when skipping files because of size differences, and
handle more than 2 repositories automatically.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
Cheered-on-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This will scan 2 or more object repositories and look for common objects, check
if they are hardlinked, and replace one with a hardlink to the other if not.
This version warns when skipping files because of size differences, and
handle more than 2 repositories automatically.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
Cheered-on-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
git-rev-parse: add "--not" flag to mark subsequent heads negative
If you have two lists of heads, and you want to see ones reachable from
list $a but not from list $b, just do
git-rev-list $(git-rev-parse $a --not $b)
which is useful for both bisecting (where "b" would be the list of known
good revisions, and "a" would be the latest found bad head) and for just
seeing what the difference between two sets of heads are if you want to
generate a pack-file for the difference.
If you have two lists of heads, and you want to see ones reachable from
list $a but not from list $b, just do
git-rev-list $(git-rev-parse $a --not $b)
which is useful for both bisecting (where "b" would be the list of known
good revisions, and "a" would be the latest found bad head) and for just
seeing what the difference between two sets of heads are if you want to
generate a pack-file for the difference.
git-unpack-objects: start removing debug output
At least the least interesting one.
At least the least interesting one.
Fix object packing/unpacking.
This actually successfully packed and unpacked a git archive down to
1.3MB (17MB unpacked).
Right now unpacking is way too noisy, lots of debug messages left.
This actually successfully packed and unpacked a git archive down to
1.3MB (17MB unpacked).
Right now unpacking is way too noisy, lots of debug messages left.
[PATCH] Finish initial cut of git-pack-object/git-unpack-object pair.
This finishes the initial round of git-pack-object /
git-unpack-object pair. They are now good enough to be used as
a transport medium:
- Fix delta direction in pack-objects; the original was
computing delta to create the base object from the object to
be squashed, which was quite unfriendly for unpacker ;-).
- Add a script to test the very basics.
- Implement unpacker for both regular and deltified objects.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This finishes the initial round of git-pack-object /
git-unpack-object pair. They are now good enough to be used as
a transport medium:
- Fix delta direction in pack-objects; the original was
computing delta to create the base object from the object to
be squashed, which was quite unfriendly for unpacker ;-).
- Add a script to test the very basics.
- Implement unpacker for both regular and deltified objects.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Add "--depth=N" parameter to git-pack-objects to limit maximum delta depth
It too defaults to 10. A nice round random number.
It too defaults to 10. A nice round random number.
git-pack-objects: make "--window=x" semantics more logical.
A zero disables delta generation (like before), but we make the window
be one bigger than specified, since we use one entry for the one to be
tested (it used to be that "--window=1" was meaningless, since we'd have
used up the single-entry window with the entry to be tested, and had no
chance of actually ever finding a delta).
The default window remains at 10, but now it really means "test the 10
closest objects", not "test the 9 closest objects".
A zero disables delta generation (like before), but we make the window
be one bigger than specified, since we use one entry for the one to be
tested (it used to be that "--window=1" was meaningless, since we'd have
used up the single-entry window with the entry to be tested, and had no
chance of actually ever finding a delta).
The default window remains at 10, but now it really means "test the 10
closest objects", not "test the 9 closest objects".
Add a "max_size" parameter to diff_delta()
Anything that generates a delta to see if two objects are close usually
isn't interested in the delta ends up being bigger than some specified
size, and this allows us to stop delta generation early when that
happens.
Anything that generates a delta to see if two objects are close usually
isn't interested in the delta ends up being bigger than some specified
size, and this allows us to stop delta generation early when that
happens.
Fix delta "sliding window" code
When Junio fixed the lack of a successful error code from try_delta(),
that uncovered an off-by-one error in the caller.
Also, some testing made it clear that we now find a lot more deltas,
because we used to (incorrectly) break early on bogus "failure"
cases.
When Junio fixed the lack of a successful error code from try_delta(),
that uncovered an off-by-one error in the caller.
Also, some testing made it clear that we now find a lot more deltas,
because we used to (incorrectly) break early on bogus "failure"
cases.
[PATCH] (patchlet) pack-objects.c: try_delta()
Return value of try_delta is checked for negativeness, but the
success path does not return anything, letting compiler warn and
presumably return garbage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Return value of try_delta is checked for negativeness, but the
success path does not return anything, letting compiler warn and
presumably return garbage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Add a bit of developer documentation to pull.h
Describe what to implement in fetch() and fetch_ref() for
pull backend writers a bit better.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Describe what to implement in fetch() and fetch_ref() for
pull backend writers a bit better.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] http-pull: documentation updates.
Describe -w option.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Describe -w option.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Fix oversimplified optimization for add_cache_entry().
An earlier change to optimize directory-file conflict check
broke what "read-tree --emu23" expects. This is fixed by this
commit.
(1) Introduces an explicit flag to tell add_cache_entry() not to
check for conflicts and use it when reading an existing tree
into an empty stage --- by definition this case can never
introduce such conflicts.
(2) Makes read-cache.c:has_file_name() and read-cache.c:has_dir_name()
aware of the cache stages, and flag conflict only with paths
in the same stage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
An earlier change to optimize directory-file conflict check
broke what "read-tree --emu23" expects. This is fixed by this
commit.
(1) Introduces an explicit flag to tell add_cache_entry() not to
check for conflicts and use it when reading an existing tree
into an empty stage --- by definition this case can never
introduce such conflicts.
(2) Makes read-cache.c:has_file_name() and read-cache.c:has_dir_name()
aware of the cache stages, and flag conflict only with paths
in the same stage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] git-merge-one-file-script: do not misinterpret rm failure.
When a merge adds a file DF and removes a directory there by
deleting a path DF/DF, git-merge-one-file-script can be called
for the removal of DF/DF when the path DF is already created by
"git-read-tree -m -u". When this happens, we get confused by a
failure return from 'rm -f -- "$4"' (where $4 is DF/DF); finding
file DF there the "rm -f" command complains that DF is not a
directory.
What we want to ensure is that there is no file DF/DF in this
case. Avoid getting ourselves confused by first checking if
there is a file, and only then try to remove it (and check for
failure from the "rm" command).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
When a merge adds a file DF and removes a directory there by
deleting a path DF/DF, git-merge-one-file-script can be called
for the removal of DF/DF when the path DF is already created by
"git-read-tree -m -u". When this happens, we get confused by a
failure return from 'rm -f -- "$4"' (where $4 is DF/DF); finding
file DF there the "rm -f" command complains that DF is not a
directory.
What we want to ensure is that there is no file DF/DF in this
case. Avoid getting ourselves confused by first checking if
there is a file, and only then try to remove it (and check for
failure from the "rm" command).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] Add more tests for read-tree --emu23.
This adds more tests for --emu23. One is to show how it can
carry forward more local changes than the straightforward
two-way fast forward, and another is to show the recent
overeager optimization of directory/file conflict check broke
things, which will be fixed in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This adds more tests for --emu23. One is to show how it can
carry forward more local changes than the straightforward
two-way fast forward, and another is to show the recent
overeager optimization of directory/file conflict check broke
things, which will be fixed in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] git-rebase-script: rebase local commits to new upstream head.
Using git-cherry, forward port local commits missing from the
new upstream head. This also depends on "-m" flag support in
git-commit-script.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Using git-cherry, forward port local commits missing from the
new upstream head. This also depends on "-m" flag support in
git-commit-script.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] git-cherry: find commits not merged upstream.
The git-cherry command helps the git-rebase script by finding
commits that have not been merged upstream. Commits already
included in upstream are prefixed with '-' (meaning "drop from
my local pull"), while commits missing from upstream are
prefixed with '+' (meaning "add to the updated upstream").
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
The git-cherry command helps the git-rebase script by finding
commits that have not been merged upstream. Commits already
included in upstream are prefixed with '-' (meaning "drop from
my local pull"), while commits missing from upstream are
prefixed with '+' (meaning "add to the updated upstream").
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] git-commit-script: get commit message from an existing one.
With -m flag specified, git-commit-script takes the commit
message along with author information from an existing commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
With -m flag specified, git-commit-script takes the commit
message along with author information from an existing commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[PATCH] fix date parsing for GIT raw commit timestamp format.
Usually all of the match_xxx routines in date.c fill tm
structure assuming that the parsed string talks about local
time, and parse_date routine compensates for it by adjusting the
value with tz offset parsed out separately. However, this logic
does not work well when we feed GIT raw commit timestamp to it,
because what match_digits gets is already in GMT.
A good testcase is:
$ make test-date
$ ./test-date 'Fri Jun 24 16:55:27 2005 -0700' '1119657327 -0700'
These two timestamps represent the same time, but the second one
without the fix this commit introduces gives you 7 hours off.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Usually all of the match_xxx routines in date.c fill tm
structure assuming that the parsed string talks about local
time, and parse_date routine compensates for it by adjusting the
value with tz offset parsed out separately. However, this logic
does not work well when we feed GIT raw commit timestamp to it,
because what match_digits gets is already in GMT.
A good testcase is:
$ make test-date
$ ./test-date 'Fri Jun 24 16:55:27 2005 -0700' '1119657327 -0700'
These two timestamps represent the same time, but the second one
without the fix this commit introduces gives you 7 hours off.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
git-unpack-objects: start parsing the actual packed data
So far we just print out the type and size.
So far we just print out the type and size.
git-pack-objects: mark the delta packing with a 'D'.
When writing a delta, we take the real type from the object we're
doing the delta against, and just write a 'D' as the type of the
current object.
When writing a delta, we take the real type from the object we're
doing the delta against, and just write a 'D' as the type of the
current object.
First cut at git-unpack-objects
So far it just reads the header and generates the list of objects.
It also sorts them by the order they are written in the pack file,
since that ends up being the same order we got them originally, and
is thus "most recent first".
So far it just reads the header and generates the list of objects.
It also sorts them by the order they are written in the pack file,
since that ends up being the same order we got them originally, and
is thus "most recent first".
git-pack-objects: fix typo
("<" should be "=")
("<" should be "=")
git-pack-objects: create a packed object representation.
This is kind of like a tar-ball for a set of objects, ready to be
shipped off to another end. Alternatively, you could use is as a packed
representation of the object database directly, if you changed
"read_sha1_file()" to read these kinds of packs.
The latter is partiularly useful to generate a "packed history", ie you
could pack up your old history efficiently, but still have it available
(at a performance hit, of course).
I haven't actually written an unpacker yet, so the end result has not
been verified in any way yet. I obviously always write bug-free code,
so it just has to work, no?
This is kind of like a tar-ball for a set of objects, ready to be
shipped off to another end. Alternatively, you could use is as a packed
representation of the object database directly, if you changed
"read_sha1_file()" to read these kinds of packs.
The latter is partiularly useful to generate a "packed history", ie you
could pack up your old history efficiently, but still have it available
(at a performance hit, of course).
I haven't actually written an unpacker yet, so the end result has not
been verified in any way yet. I obviously always write bug-free code,
so it just has to work, no?