user-manual: move packfile and dangling object discussion
The discussions of packfiles and dangling objects both belong in the
object database section.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The discussions of packfiles and dangling objects both belong in the
object database section.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: rewrite object database discussion
Rewrite the introduction. Rewrite each section completely to make them
work in the new order, to add some examples, and to move plumbing
commands (like git-commit-tree) to the following chapter.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Rewrite the introduction. Rewrite each section completely to make them
work in the new order, to add some examples, and to move plumbing
commands (like git-commit-tree) to the following chapter.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: reorder commit, blob, tree discussion
The bottom-up blog, tree, commit order makes sense unless you want to
give explicit examples--it's easier to discover objects to examine if
you go in the other order....,
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The bottom-up blog, tree, commit order makes sense unless you want to
give explicit examples--it's easier to discover objects to examine if
you go in the other order....,
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: rewrite index discussion
Add an example using git-ls-files, standardize on the new "index"
terminology (as opposed to "cache"), attempt to clarify discussion and
make it a little shorter, avoid some unnecessary jargon ("write-back
cache").
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Add an example using git-ls-files, standardize on the new "index"
terminology (as opposed to "cache"), attempt to clarify discussion and
make it a little shorter, avoid some unnecessary jargon ("write-back
cache").
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: create new "low-level git operations" chapter
The low-level index operations aren't as important to regular users as
the rest of this "git concepts" chapter; so move it into a separate
chapter, and do some minor cleanup.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The low-level index operations aren't as important to regular users as
the rest of this "git concepts" chapter; so move it into a separate
chapter, and do some minor cleanup.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: rename "git internals" to "git concepts"
"git internals" sounds like something only git developers must know
about, but this stuff should be of wider interest. Rename the chapter
and give it a slightly friendlier introduction.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
"git internals" sounds like something only git developers must know
about, but this stuff should be of wider interest. Rename the chapter
and give it a slightly friendlier introduction.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: move object format details to hacking-git chapter
Most of this is probably only of interest to git developers.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Most of this is probably only of interest to git developers.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: adjust section levels in "git internals"
The descriptions of the various object types should all be a subsection
of the "Object Database" section.
I cribbed most of this chapter from the README (now core-intro.txt and
git(7)), because there's stuff in there people need to know and I was
too lazy to rewrite it. The audience isn't quite right, though--the
chapter is a mixture of user- and developer- level documentation that
isn't as appropriate now as it was originally.
So, reserve this chapter for stuff users need to know, and move the
source code introduction into a new "git hacking" chapter where we'll
also move any hacker-only technical details.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The descriptions of the various object types should all be a subsection
of the "Object Database" section.
I cribbed most of this chapter from the README (now core-intro.txt and
git(7)), because there's stuff in there people need to know and I was
too lazy to rewrite it. The audience isn't quite right, though--the
chapter is a mixture of user- and developer- level documentation that
isn't as appropriate now as it was originally.
So, reserve this chapter for stuff users need to know, and move the
source code introduction into a new "git hacking" chapter where we'll
also move any hacker-only technical details.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Documentation/git-config.txt: AsciiDoc tweak to avoid leading dot
Bram Schoenmakers noticed that git-config document was formatted
incorrectly. Depending on the version of AsciiDoc and docbook
toolchain, it is sometimes taken as a numbered example by AsciiDoc,
some other times passed intact to roff format to confuse "man".
Since we refer to the repository metadata directory as $GIT_DIR
elsewhere, work it around by using that symbolic name.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Bram Schoenmakers noticed that git-config document was formatted
incorrectly. Depending on the version of AsciiDoc and docbook
toolchain, it is sometimes taken as a numbered example by AsciiDoc,
some other times passed intact to roff format to confuse "man".
Since we refer to the repository metadata directory as $GIT_DIR
elsewhere, work it around by using that symbolic name.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add test to check recent fix to "git add -u"
An earlier commit fixed type-change case in "git add -u".
This adds a test to make sure we do not introduce regression.
At the same time, it fixes a stupid typo in the error message.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An earlier commit fixed type-change case in "git add -u".
This adds a test to make sure we do not introduce regression.
At the same time, it fixes a stupid typo in the error message.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation/git-archive.txt: a couple of clarifications.
The description of the option gave impression that there
were several formats available by using three dots. There are
no other formats than tar and gzip currently supported.
Clarify that the archive goes to the standard output.
Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The description of the option gave impression that there
were several formats available by using three dots. There are
no other formats than tar and gzip currently supported.
Clarify that the archive goes to the standard output.
Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix the rename detection limit checking
This adds more proper rename detection limits. Instead of just checking
the limit against the number of potential rename destinations, we verify
that the rename matrix (which is what really matters) doesn't grow
ridiculously large, and we also make sure that we don't overflow when
doing the matrix size calculation.
This also changes the default limits from unlimited, to a rename matrix
that is limited to 100 entries on a side. You can raise it with the config
entry, or by using the "-l<n>" command line flag, but at least the default
is now a sane number that avoids spending lots of time (and memory) in
situations that likely don't merit it.
The choice of default value is of course very debatable. Limiting the
rename matrix to a 100x100 size will mean that even if you have just one
obvious rename, but you also create (or delete) 10,000 files, the rename
matrix will be so big that we disable the heuristics. Sounds reasonable to
me, but let's see if people hit this (and, perhaps more importantly,
actually *care*) in real life.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This adds more proper rename detection limits. Instead of just checking
the limit against the number of potential rename destinations, we verify
that the rename matrix (which is what really matters) doesn't grow
ridiculously large, and we also make sure that we don't overflow when
doing the matrix size calculation.
This also changes the default limits from unlimited, to a rename matrix
that is limited to 100 entries on a side. You can raise it with the config
entry, or by using the "-l<n>" command line flag, but at least the default
is now a sane number that avoids spending lots of time (and memory) in
situations that likely don't merit it.
The choice of default value is of course very debatable. Limiting the
rename matrix to a 100x100 size will mean that even if you have just one
obvious rename, but you also create (or delete) 10,000 files, the rename
matrix will be so big that we disable the heuristics. Sounds reasonable to
me, but let's see if people hit this (and, perhaps more importantly,
actually *care*) in real life.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
diff --no-index: do not forget to run diff_setup_done()
Code inspection by Linus found this.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Code inspection by Linus found this.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-format-patch --in-reply-to: accept <message@id> with angle brackets
This will allow RFC-literate users to say:
format-patch --in-reply-to='<message.id@site.name>'
without forcing them to strip the surrounding angle brackets
like this:
format-patch --in-reply-to='message.id@site.name'
We accept both forms, and the latter gets necessary < and >
around it as before.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This will allow RFC-literate users to say:
format-patch --in-reply-to='<message.id@site.name>'
without forcing them to strip the surrounding angle brackets
like this:
format-patch --in-reply-to='message.id@site.name'
We accept both forms, and the latter gets necessary < and >
around it as before.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-add -u: do not barf on type changes
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove duplicate note about removing commits with git-filter-branch
A duplicate of an already existing section in the documentation of
git-filter-branch was added in commit
f95eef15f2f8a336b9a42749f5458c841a5a5d63.
This patch removes that redundant section.
Signed-off-by: Ulrik Sverdrup <ulrik.sverdrup@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A duplicate of an already existing section in the documentation of
git-filter-branch was added in commit
f95eef15f2f8a336b9a42749f5458c841a5a5d63.
This patch removes that redundant section.
Signed-off-by: Ulrik Sverdrup <ulrik.sverdrup@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-clone: improve error message if curl program is missing or not executable
If the curl program is not available (or not executable), and git clone is
started to clone a repository through http, this is the output
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/puppet/.git/
/usr/bin/git-clone: line 37: curl: command not found
Cannot get remote repository information.
Perhaps git-update-server-info needs to be run there?
This patch improves the error message by checking the return code when
running curl to exit immediately if it's 126 or 127; the error output now
is
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/puppet/.git/
/usr/bin/git-clone: line 37: curl: command not found
Adrian Bridgett noticed this and reported through
http://bugs.debian.org/440976
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the curl program is not available (or not executable), and git clone is
started to clone a repository through http, this is the output
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/puppet/.git/
/usr/bin/git-clone: line 37: curl: command not found
Cannot get remote repository information.
Perhaps git-update-server-info needs to be run there?
This patch improves the error message by checking the return code when
running curl to exit immediately if it's 126 or 127; the error output now
is
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/puppet/.git/
/usr/bin/git-clone: line 37: curl: command not found
Adrian Bridgett noticed this and reported through
http://bugs.debian.org/440976
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
hooks--update: Explicitly check for all zeros for a deleted ref.
The previous check caused the hook to reject as unannotated any tag
whose SHA1 starts with a zero.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous check caused the hook to reject as unannotated any tag
whose SHA1 starts with a zero.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'sp/maint-no-thin' into maint
* sp/maint-no-thin:
Make --no-thin the default in git-push to save server resources
* sp/maint-no-thin:
Make --no-thin the default in git-push to save server resources
stash: end index commit log with a newline
There was no newline at the end of the index commit message, putting
the shell prompt at its end after a 'git cat-file commit $id'. This is
similar to what was fixed in 843103d69388a5c74ed99753e1c162a66835b04d.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@gmx.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There was no newline at the end of the index commit message, putting
the shell prompt at its end after a 'git cat-file commit $id'. This is
similar to what was fixed in 843103d69388a5c74ed99753e1c162a66835b04d.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@gmx.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-commit: Disallow amend if it is going to produce an empty non-merge commit
Right now one can amend the last non-merge commit using a dirty index
and in the process maybe cause the last commit to have the same tree
as its parent. In such a case one would want to discard the last commit
instead of amending it.
This reverts commit 8588452ceb78b1da17652ba03f9942ef740e07ea.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Right now one can amend the last non-merge commit using a dirty index
and in the process maybe cause the last commit to have the same tree
as its parent. In such a case one would want to discard the last commit
instead of amending it.
This reverts commit 8588452ceb78b1da17652ba03f9942ef740e07ea.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-send-email.perl: Add angle brackets to In-Reply-To if necessary
Although message-id by defintion should have surrounding angle
brackets, there is no point forcing people to type them in.
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Although message-id by defintion should have surrounding angle
brackets, there is no point forcing people to type them in.
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a test failure (t9500-*.sh) on cygwin
On filesystems where it is appropriate to set core.filemode
to false, test 29 ("commitdiff(0): mode change") fails when
git-commit does not notice a file (execute) permission change.
A fix requires noting the new file execute permission in the
index with a "git update-index --chmod=+x", prior to the commit.
Add a function (note_chmod) which implements this idea, and
insert a call in each test that modifies the x permission.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
On filesystems where it is appropriate to set core.filemode
to false, test 29 ("commitdiff(0): mode change") fails when
git-commit does not notice a file (execute) permission change.
A fix requires noting the new file execute permission in the
index with a "git update-index --chmod=+x", prior to the commit.
Add a function (note_chmod) which implements this idea, and
insert a call in each test that modifies the x permission.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make --no-thin the default in git-push to save server resources
1) pushes happen less often than fetches, so the bandwidth saving is
much less visible in that case overall.
2) thin packs have to be complemented with missing delta bases to be
valid, so many received thin packs will take more disk space.
3) the bother of repacking should be distributed amongst "clients"
i.e. fetchers and pushers as much as possible, and not the server
being fetched or pushed, to keep disk and CPU usage low on the
server.
This is why a fetch should get thin packs but a push should not.
Both Nico and I have been assuming that --no-thin was the default
behavior of git-push ever since Nico introduced --fix-thin into the
index-pack process, which allowed fetch and receive-pack to avoid
exploding packfiles received during transfer. This patch finally
makes it so.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
1) pushes happen less often than fetches, so the bandwidth saving is
much less visible in that case overall.
2) thin packs have to be complemented with missing delta bases to be
valid, so many received thin packs will take more disk space.
3) the bother of repacking should be distributed amongst "clients"
i.e. fetchers and pushers as much as possible, and not the server
being fetched or pushed, to keep disk and CPU usage low on the
server.
This is why a fetch should get thin packs but a push should not.
Both Nico and I have been assuming that --no-thin was the default
behavior of git-push ever since Nico introduced --fix-thin into the
index-pack process, which allowed fetch and receive-pack to avoid
exploding packfiles received during transfer. This patch finally
makes it so.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
fix doc for --compression argument to pack-objects
Remove obsolete details (core.legacyheaders is always true now).
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove obsolete details (core.legacyheaders is always true now).
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-tag -s must fail if gpg cannot sign the tag.
Most of this patch code and message was written by Shawn O. Pearce.
I made some tests to know what the problem was, and then I changed
the code related with the SIGPIPE signal.
If the user has misconfigured `user.signingkey` in their .git/config
or just doesn't have any secret keys on their keyring and they ask
for a signed tag with `git tag -s` we better make sure the resulting
tag was actually signed by gpg.
Prior versions of builtin git-tag allowed this failure to slip
by without error as they were not checking the return value of
the finish_command() so they did not notice when gpg exited with
an error exit status. They also did not fail if gpg produced an
empty output or if read_in_full received an error from the read
system call while trying to read the pipe back from gpg.
Finally, we did not actually honor any return value from the do_sign
function as it returns ssize_t but was being stored into an unsigned
long. This caused the compiler to optimize out the die condition,
allowing git-tag to continue along and create the tag object.
However, when gpg gets a wrong username, it exits before any read was done
and then the writing process receives SIGPIPE and program is terminated.
By ignoring this signal, anyway, the function write_or_die gets EPIPE from
write_in_full and exits returning 0 to the system without a message.
Here we better call to write_in_full directly so we can fail
printing a message and return safely to the caller.
With these issues fixed `git-tag -s` will now fail to create the
tag and will report a non-zero exit status to its caller, thereby
allowing automated helper scripts to detect (and recover from)
failure if gpg is not working properly.
Proposed-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most of this patch code and message was written by Shawn O. Pearce.
I made some tests to know what the problem was, and then I changed
the code related with the SIGPIPE signal.
If the user has misconfigured `user.signingkey` in their .git/config
or just doesn't have any secret keys on their keyring and they ask
for a signed tag with `git tag -s` we better make sure the resulting
tag was actually signed by gpg.
Prior versions of builtin git-tag allowed this failure to slip
by without error as they were not checking the return value of
the finish_command() so they did not notice when gpg exited with
an error exit status. They also did not fail if gpg produced an
empty output or if read_in_full received an error from the read
system call while trying to read the pipe back from gpg.
Finally, we did not actually honor any return value from the do_sign
function as it returns ssize_t but was being stored into an unsigned
long. This caused the compiler to optimize out the die condition,
allowing git-tag to continue along and create the tag object.
However, when gpg gets a wrong username, it exits before any read was done
and then the writing process receives SIGPIPE and program is terminated.
By ignoring this signal, anyway, the function write_or_die gets EPIPE from
write_in_full and exits returning 0 to the system without a message.
Here we better call to write_in_full directly so we can fail
printing a message and return safely to the caller.
With these issues fixed `git-tag -s` will now fail to create the
tag and will report a non-zero exit status to its caller, thereby
allowing automated helper scripts to detect (and recover from)
failure if gpg is not working properly.
Proposed-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-svn: understand grafts when doing dcommit
Use the rev-list --parents functionality to read the parents
of the commit. cat-file only shows the raw object with the
original parents and doesn't take into account grafts; so
we'll rely on rev-list machinery for the smarts here.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the rev-list --parents functionality to read the parents
of the commit. cat-file only shows the raw object with the
original parents and doesn't take into account grafts; so
we'll rely on rev-list machinery for the smarts here.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-diff: don't squelch the new SHA1 in submodule diffs
The code to squelch empty diffs introduced by commit
fb13227e089f22dc31a3b1624559153821056848 would inadvertently
populate filespec "two" of a submodule change using the uninitialized
(null) SHA1, thereby replacing the submodule SHA1 by 0{40} in the output.
This change teaches diffcore_skip_stat_unmatch to handle
submodule changes correctly.
Signed-off-by: Sven Verdoolaege <skimo@kotnet.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The code to squelch empty diffs introduced by commit
fb13227e089f22dc31a3b1624559153821056848 would inadvertently
populate filespec "two" of a submodule change using the uninitialized
(null) SHA1, thereby replacing the submodule SHA1 by 0{40} in the output.
This change teaches diffcore_skip_stat_unmatch to handle
submodule changes correctly.
Signed-off-by: Sven Verdoolaege <skimo@kotnet.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-svn: fix "Malformed network data" with svn:// servers
We have a workaround for the reparent function not working
correctly on the SVN native protocol servers. This workaround
opens a new connection (SVN::Ra object) to the new
URL/directory.
Since libsvn appears limited to only supporting one connection
at a time, this workaround invalidates the Git::SVN::Ra object
that is $self inside gs_fetch_loop_common(). So we need to
restart that connection once all the fetching is done for each
loop iteration to be able to run get_log() successfully.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have a workaround for the reparent function not working
correctly on the SVN native protocol servers. This workaround
opens a new connection (SVN::Ra object) to the new
URL/directory.
Since libsvn appears limited to only supporting one connection
at a time, this workaround invalidates the Git::SVN::Ra object
that is $self inside gs_fetch_loop_common(). So we need to
restart that connection once all the fetching is done for each
loop iteration to be able to run get_log() successfully.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
(cvs|svn)import: Ask git-tag to overwrite old tags.
If the tag was moved in CVS or SVN history, it will be moved in the
imported history as well. Tag history is not tracked.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the tag was moved in CVS or SVN history, it will be moved in the
imported history as well. Tag history is not tracked.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation / grammer nit
If we're counting, a smaller number is 'fewer' not 'less'
Signed-off-by: Mike Ralphson <mike@abacus.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we're counting, a smaller number is 'fewer' not 'less'
Signed-off-by: Mike Ralphson <mike@abacus.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Include a git-push example for creating a remote branch
Many users get confused when `git push origin master:foo` works
when foo already exists on the remote repository but are confused
when foo doesn't exist as a branch and this form does not create
the branch foo.
This new example highlights the trick of including refs/heads/
in front of the desired branch name to create a branch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Many users get confused when `git push origin master:foo` works
when foo already exists on the remote repository but are confused
when foo doesn't exist as a branch and this form does not create
the branch foo.
This new example highlights the trick of including refs/heads/
in front of the desired branch name to create a branch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cleanup unnecessary file modifications in t1400-update-ref
Kristian Høgsberg pointed out that the two file modifications
we were doing during the 'creating initial files' step are not even
used within the test suite. This was actually confusing as we do
not even need these changes for the tests to pass. All that really
matters here is the specific commit dates are used so that these
appear in the branch's reflog, and that the dates are different so
that the branch will update when asked and the reflog entry is
also updated. There is no need for the file modification.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Kristian Høgsberg pointed out that the two file modifications
we were doing during the 'creating initial files' step are not even
used within the test suite. This was actually confusing as we do
not even need these changes for the tests to pass. All that really
matters here is the specific commit dates are used so that these
appear in the branch's reflog, and that the dates are different so
that the branch will update when asked and the reflog entry is
also updated. There is no need for the file modification.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Makefile: Add cache-tree.h to the headers list
The dependency was missing.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The dependency was missing.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't allow contrib/workdir/git-new-workdir to trash existing dirs
Recently I found that doing a sequence like the following:
git-new-workdir a b
...
git-new-workdir a b
by accident will cause a (and now also b) to have an infinite cycle
in its refs directory. This is caused by git-new-workdir trying
to create the "refs" symlink over again, only during the second
time it is being created within a's refs directory and is now also
pointing back at a's refs.
This causes confusion in git as suddenly branches are named things
like "refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/heads/foo" instead of the
more commonly accepted "refs/heads/foo". Plenty of commands start
to see ambiguous ref names and others just take ages to compute.
git-clone has the same safety check, so git-new-workdir should
behave just like it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Recently I found that doing a sequence like the following:
git-new-workdir a b
...
git-new-workdir a b
by accident will cause a (and now also b) to have an infinite cycle
in its refs directory. This is caused by git-new-workdir trying
to create the "refs" symlink over again, only during the second
time it is being created within a's refs directory and is now also
pointing back at a's refs.
This causes confusion in git as suddenly branches are named things
like "refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/heads/foo" instead of the
more commonly accepted "refs/heads/foo". Plenty of commands start
to see ambiguous ref names and others just take ages to compute.
git-clone has the same safety check, so git-new-workdir should
behave just like it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-apply: do not read past the end of buffer
When the preimage we are patching is shorter than what the patch
text expects, we tried to match the buffer contents at the
"original" line with the fragment in full, without checking we
have enough data to match in the preimage. This caused the size
of a later memmove() to wrap around and attempt to scribble
almost the entire address space. Not good.
The code that follows the part this patch touches tries to match
the fragment with line offsets. Curiously, that code does not
have the problem --- it guards against reading past the end of
the preimage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the preimage we are patching is shorter than what the patch
text expects, we tried to match the buffer contents at the
"original" line with the fragment in full, without checking we
have enough data to match in the preimage. This caused the size
of a later memmove() to wrap around and attempt to scribble
almost the entire address space. Not good.
The code that follows the part this patch touches tries to match
the fragment with line offsets. Curiously, that code does not
have the problem --- it guards against reading past the end of
the preimage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GIT 1.5.3.1: obsolete git-p4 in RPM spec file.
HPA noticed that yum does not like the newer git RPM set; it turns out
that we do not ship git-p4 anymore but existing installations do not
realize the package is gone if we do not tell anything about it.
David Kastrup suggests using Obsoletes in the spec file of the new
RPM to replace the old package, so here is a try.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
HPA noticed that yum does not like the newer git RPM set; it turns out
that we do not ship git-p4 anymore but existing installations do not
realize the package is gone if we do not tell anything about it.
David Kastrup suggests using Obsoletes in the spec file of the new
RPM to replace the old package, so here is a try.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Typofix: 1.5.3 release notes
GIT 1.5.3
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'jp/send-email-cc'
* jp/send-email-cc:
git-send-email --cc-cmd
* jp/send-email-cc:
git-send-email --cc-cmd
Mention -m as an abbreviation for --merge
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update my contact address as the maintainer.
Documentation: minor AsciiDoc mark-up fixes.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
URL: allow port specification in ssh:// URLs
Allow port specification in ssh:// URLs in the
usual notation:
ssh://[user@]host.domain[:<port>]/<path>
This allows git to be used over ssh-tunneling
networks.
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allow port specification in ssh:// URLs in the
usual notation:
ssh://[user@]host.domain[:<port>]/<path>
This allows git to be used over ssh-tunneling
networks.
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Avoid one-or-more (\+) non BRE in sed scripts.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase -m: Fix incorrect short-logs of already applied commits.
When a topic branch is rebased, some of whose commits are already
cherry-picked upstream:
o--X--A--B--Y <- master
\
A--B--Z <- topic
then 'git rebase -m master' would report:
Already applied: 0001 Y
Already applied: 0002 Y
With this fix it reports the expected:
Already applied: 0001 A
Already applied: 0002 B
As an added bonus, this change also avoids 'echo' of a commit message,
which might contain escapements.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a topic branch is rebased, some of whose commits are already
cherry-picked upstream:
o--X--A--B--Y <- master
\
A--B--Z <- topic
then 'git rebase -m master' would report:
Already applied: 0001 Y
Already applied: 0002 Y
With this fix it reports the expected:
Already applied: 0001 A
Already applied: 0002 B
As an added bonus, this change also avoids 'echo' of a commit message,
which might contain escapements.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-diff: resurrect the traditional empty "diff --git" behaviour
The warning message to suggest "Consider running git-status" from
"git-diff" that we experimented with during the 1.5.3 cycle turns
out to be a bad idea. It robbed cache-dirty information from people
who valued it, while still asking users to run "update-index --refresh".
It was hoped that the new behaviour would at least have some educational
value, but not showing the cache-dirty paths like before meant that the
user would not even know easily which paths were cache-dirty, and it
made the need to refresh the index look like even more unnecessary chore.
This commit reinstates the traditional behaviour, but with a twist.
By default, the empty "diff --git" output is totally squelched out
from "git diff" output. At the end of the command, it automatically
runs "update-index --refresh" as needed, without even bothering the
user. In other words, people who do not care about the cache-dirtyness
do not even have to see the warning.
The traditional behaviour to see the stat-dirty output and to bypassing
the overhead of content comparison can be specified by setting the
configuration variable diff.autorefreshindex to false.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The warning message to suggest "Consider running git-status" from
"git-diff" that we experimented with during the 1.5.3 cycle turns
out to be a bad idea. It robbed cache-dirty information from people
who valued it, while still asking users to run "update-index --refresh".
It was hoped that the new behaviour would at least have some educational
value, but not showing the cache-dirty paths like before meant that the
user would not even know easily which paths were cache-dirty, and it
made the need to refresh the index look like even more unnecessary chore.
This commit reinstates the traditional behaviour, but with a twist.
By default, the empty "diff --git" output is totally squelched out
from "git diff" output. At the end of the command, it automatically
runs "update-index --refresh" as needed, without even bothering the
user. In other words, people who do not care about the cache-dirtyness
do not even have to see the warning.
The traditional behaviour to see the stat-dirty output and to bypassing
the overhead of content comparison can be specified by setting the
configuration variable diff.autorefreshindex to false.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-tag: Fix -l option to use better shell style globs.
This patch removes certain behaviour of "git tag -l foo", currently
listing every tag name having "foo" as a substring. The same
thing now could be achieved doing "git tag -l '*foo*'".
This feature was added recently when git-tag.sh got the -n option
for showing tag annotations, because that commit also replaced the
old "grep pattern" behaviour with a more preferable "shell pattern"
behaviour (although slightly modified as you can see).
Thus, the following builtin-tag.c implemented it in order to
ensure that tests were passing unchanged with both programs.
Since common "shell patterns" match names with a given substring
_only_ when * is inserted before and after (as in "*substring*"), and
the "plain" behaviour cannot be achieved easily with the current
implementation, this is mostly the right thing to do, in order to
make it more flexible and consistent.
Tests for "git tag" were also changed to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch removes certain behaviour of "git tag -l foo", currently
listing every tag name having "foo" as a substring. The same
thing now could be achieved doing "git tag -l '*foo*'".
This feature was added recently when git-tag.sh got the -n option
for showing tag annotations, because that commit also replaced the
old "grep pattern" behaviour with a more preferable "shell pattern"
behaviour (although slightly modified as you can see).
Thus, the following builtin-tag.c implemented it in order to
ensure that tests were passing unchanged with both programs.
Since common "shell patterns" match names with a given substring
_only_ when * is inserted before and after (as in "*substring*"), and
the "plain" behaviour cannot be achieved easily with the current
implementation, this is mostly the right thing to do, in order to
make it more flexible and consistent.
Tests for "git tag" were also changed to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-svn: fix dcommit clobbering upstream when committing multiple changes
Although dcommit could detect if the first commit in the series
would conflict with the HEAD revision in SVN, it could not
detect conflicts in further commits it made.
Now we rebase each uncommitted change after each revision is
committed to SVN to ensure that we are up-to-date. git-rebase
will bail out on conflict errors if our next change cannot be
applied and committed to SVN cleanly, preventing accidental
clobbering of changes on the SVN-side.
--no-rebase users will have trouble with this, and are thus
warned if they are committing more than one commit. Fixing this
for (hopefully uncommon) --no-rebase users would be more complex
and will probably happen at a later date.
Thanks to David Watson for finding this and the original test.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Although dcommit could detect if the first commit in the series
would conflict with the HEAD revision in SVN, it could not
detect conflicts in further commits it made.
Now we rebase each uncommitted change after each revision is
committed to SVN to ensure that we are up-to-date. git-rebase
will bail out on conflict errors if our next change cannot be
applied and committed to SVN cleanly, preventing accidental
clobbering of changes on the SVN-side.
--no-rebase users will have trouble with this, and are thus
warned if they are committing more than one commit. Fixing this
for (hopefully uncommon) --no-rebase users would be more complex
and will probably happen at a later date.
Thanks to David Watson for finding this and the original test.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-svn: Protect against "diff.color = true".
If the configuration of the user has "diff.color = true", the
output from "log" we invoke internally added color codes, which
broke the parser.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tested-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
If the configuration of the user has "diff.color = true", the
output from "log" we invoke internally added color codes, which
broke the parser.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tested-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
filter-branch: introduce convenience function "skip_commit"
With this function, a commit filter can leave out unwanted commits
(such as temporary commits). It does _not_ undo the changeset
corresponding to that commit, but it _skips_ the revision. IOW
no tree object is changed by this.
If you like to commit early and often, but want to filter out all
intermediate commits, marked by "@@@" in the commit message, you can
now do this with
git filter-branch --commit-filter '
if git cat-file commit $GIT_COMMIT | grep '@@@' > /dev/null;
then
skip_commit "$@";
else
git commit-tree "$@";
fi' newbranch
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With this function, a commit filter can leave out unwanted commits
(such as temporary commits). It does _not_ undo the changeset
corresponding to that commit, but it _skips_ the revision. IOW
no tree object is changed by this.
If you like to commit early and often, but want to filter out all
intermediate commits, marked by "@@@" in the commit message, you can
now do this with
git filter-branch --commit-filter '
if git cat-file commit $GIT_COMMIT | grep '@@@' > /dev/null;
then
skip_commit "$@";
else
git commit-tree "$@";
fi' newbranch
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
filter-branch: provide the convenience functions also for commit filters
Move the convenience functions to the top of git-filter-branch.sh, and
return from the script when the environment variable SOURCE_FUNCTIONS is
set.
By sourcing git-filter-branch with that variable set automatically, all
commit filters may access the convenience functions like "map".
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Move the convenience functions to the top of git-filter-branch.sh, and
return from the script when the environment variable SOURCE_FUNCTIONS is
set.
By sourcing git-filter-branch with that variable set automatically, all
commit filters may access the convenience functions like "map".
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase -i: mention the option to split commits in the man page
The interactive mode of rebase can be used to split commits. Tell the
interested parties about it, with a dedicated section in the man page.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The interactive mode of rebase can be used to split commits. Tell the
interested parties about it, with a dedicated section in the man page.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
filter-branch: fix remnants of old syntax in documentation
Some time ago, filter-branch's syntax changed so that more than one
ref can be rewritten at the same time. This involved the removal of
the ref name for the result; instead, the refs are rewritten in-place.
This updates the last leftovers in the documentation to reflect the
new behavior.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some time ago, filter-branch's syntax changed so that more than one
ref can be rewritten at the same time. This involved the removal of
the ref name for the result; instead, the refs are rewritten in-place.
This updates the last leftovers in the documentation to reflect the
new behavior.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach bash about completing arguments for git-tag
Lately I have been doing a lot of calls to `git tag -d` and also to
`git tag -v`. In both such cases being able to complete the names
of existing tags saves the fingers some typing effort. We now look
for the -d or -v option to git-tag in the bash completion support
and offer up existing tag names as possible choices for these.
When creating a new tag we now also offer bash completion support
for the second argument to git-tag (the object to be tagged) as this
can often be a specific existing branch name and is not necessarily
the current HEAD.
If the -f option is being used to recreate an existing tag we now
also offer completion support on the existing tag names for the
first argument of git-tag, helping to the user to reselect the
prior tag name that they are trying to replace.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Lately I have been doing a lot of calls to `git tag -d` and also to
`git tag -v`. In both such cases being able to complete the names
of existing tags saves the fingers some typing effort. We now look
for the -d or -v option to git-tag in the bash completion support
and offer up existing tag names as possible choices for these.
When creating a new tag we now also offer bash completion support
for the second argument to git-tag (the object to be tagged) as this
can often be a specific existing branch name and is not necessarily
the current HEAD.
If the -f option is being used to recreate an existing tag we now
also offer completion support on the existing tag names for the
first argument of git-tag, helping to the user to reselect the
prior tag name that they are trying to replace.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Hopefully the final update to draft release notes for 1.5.3.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make "git-log --" without paths behave the same as "git-log" without --
"git log" family of commands, even when run from a subdirectory,
do not limit the revision range with the current directory as
the path limiter, but with double-dash without any paths after
it, i.e. "git log --" do so. It was a mistake to have a
difference between "git log --" and "git log" introduced in
commit ae563542bf10fa8c33abd2a354e4b28aca4264d7 (First cut at
libifying revlist generation).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git log" family of commands, even when run from a subdirectory,
do not limit the revision range with the current directory as
the path limiter, but with double-dash without any paths after
it, i.e. "git log --" do so. It was a mistake to have a
difference between "git log --" and "git log" introduced in
commit ae563542bf10fa8c33abd2a354e4b28aca4264d7 (First cut at
libifying revlist generation).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-init: autodetect core.symlinks
We already autodetect if filemode is reliable on the filesystem
to deal with VFAT and friends. Do the same for symbolic link
support.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We already autodetect if filemode is reliable on the filesystem
to deal with VFAT and friends. Do the same for symbolic link
support.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make git-archimport log entries more consistent
When appending the "git-archimport-id:" line to the end of log entries,
git-archimport would use two blank lines as a separator when there was no
body in the arch log (only a Summary: line), and zero blank lines when there
was a body (making it hard to see the break between the actual log message
and the git-archimport-id: line).
This patch makes git-archimport generate one blank line as a separator in all
cases.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When appending the "git-archimport-id:" line to the end of log entries,
git-archimport would use two blank lines as a separator when there was no
body in the arch log (only a Summary: line), and zero blank lines when there
was a body (making it hard to see the break between the actual log message
and the git-archimport-id: line).
This patch makes git-archimport generate one blank line as a separator in all
cases.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
fix same sized delta logic
The code favoring shallower deltas when size is equal was triggered
only when previous delta was also cached. There should be no relation
between cached deltas and same sized deltas.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The code favoring shallower deltas when size is equal was triggered
only when previous delta was also cached. There should be no relation
between cached deltas and same sized deltas.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
filter-branch: make sure orig_namespace ends with a single slash.
Later in a loop any existing ref whose path begins with it is
removed. It would be a disaster if you allowed it to say refs/head
for example.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Later in a loop any existing ref whose path begins with it is
removed. It would be a disaster if you allowed it to say refs/head
for example.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-filter-branch: document --original option
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-filter-branch: more detailed USAGE
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Makefile: do not allow gnu make to remove test-*.o files
It appears parallel build (-j) gets confused.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It appears parallel build (-j) gets confused.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Temporary fix for stack smashing in mailinfo
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fixing comment in merge strategies
Comments in both these strategies refer to the wrong number
of remotes
Signed-off-by: Tom Clarke <tom@u2i.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Comments in both these strategies refer to the wrong number
of remotes
Signed-off-by: Tom Clarke <tom@u2i.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
ls-files --error-unmatch: do not barf if the same pattern is given twice.
This is most visible when you do "git commit Makefile Makefile"; it
may be a stupid request, but that is not a reason to fail the command.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is most visible when you do "git commit Makefile Makefile"; it
may be a stupid request, but that is not a reason to fail the command.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'master' of git://git./gitk/gitk
* 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/gitk/gitk:
gitk: Fix bug causing undefined variable error when cherry-picking
* 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/gitk/gitk:
gitk: Fix bug causing undefined variable error when cherry-picking
completion: also complete git-log's --left-right and --cherry-pick option
Both --left-right and --cherry-pick are particularly long to type, so
help the user there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Both --left-right and --cherry-pick are particularly long to type, so
help the user there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitk: Fix bug causing undefined variable error when cherry-picking
When "Show nearby tags" is turned off and the user did a cherry-pick,
we were trying to access variables relating to the descendent/ancestor
tag & head computations in addnewchild though they hadn't been set.
This makes sure we don't do that. Reported by Johannes Sixt.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
When "Show nearby tags" is turned off and the user did a cherry-pick,
we were trying to access variables relating to the descendent/ancestor
tag & head computations in addnewchild though they hadn't been set.
This makes sure we don't do that. Reported by Johannes Sixt.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
git-daemon(1): assorted improvements.
Jari Aalto noticed a handful places in git-daemon documentation
that need to be improved.
* --inetd makes --pid-file to be ignored, in addition to --user
and --group
* receive-pack service was not described at all. We should, if
only to warn about the security implications of it.
* There was no example of per repository configuration.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jari Aalto noticed a handful places in git-daemon documentation
that need to be improved.
* --inetd makes --pid-file to be ignored, in addition to --user
and --group
* receive-pack service was not described at all. We should, if
only to warn about the security implications of it.
* There was no example of per repository configuration.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GIT 1.5.3-rc7
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-svn.txt: fix an obvious misspelling.
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git.el: Added colors for dark background
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
format-patch documentation: reword to hint "--root <one-commit>" more clearly
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'jc/logsemantics'
* jc/logsemantics:
"format-patch --root rev" is the way to show everything.
Porcelain level "log" family should recurse when diffing.
* jc/logsemantics:
"format-patch --root rev" is the way to show everything.
Porcelain level "log" family should recurse when diffing.
Documentation/git-diff: A..B and A...B cannot take tree-ishes
As pointed out by Linus, these notations require the endpoints
given by the end user to be commits. Clarify.
Also, three-dots in AsciiDoc are turned into ellipses unless
quoted with bq. Be careful.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As pointed out by Linus, these notations require the endpoints
given by the end user to be commits. Clarify.
Also, three-dots in AsciiDoc are turned into ellipses unless
quoted with bq. Be careful.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-add: Make the filename globbing note a bit clearer
I think the trick with Git-side filename globbing is important and perhaps
not that well known. Clarify a bit in git-add documentation what it means.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I think the trick with Git-side filename globbing is important and perhaps
not that well known. Clarify a bit in git-add documentation what it means.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-add: Make the "tried to add ignored file" error message less confusing
Currently the error message seems to imply (at least to me) that only
the listed files were withheld and the rest of the files was added to the
index, even though that's obviously not the case.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently the error message seems to imply (at least to me) that only
the listed files were withheld and the rest of the files was added to the
index, even though that's obviously not the case.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitweb: Fix escaping HTML of project owner in 'projects_list' and
'summary' views
This for example allows to put email address in the project owner
field in the projects index file (when $projects_list points to
a file, and not to a directory), in the form of:
path/to/repo.git Random+J+Developer+<random@developer.example.org>
Noticed-by: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'summary' views
This for example allows to put email address in the project owner
field in the projects index file (when $projects_list points to
a file, and not to a directory), in the form of:
path/to/repo.git Random+J+Developer+<random@developer.example.org>
Noticed-by: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"format-patch --root rev" is the way to show everything.
We used to trigger the special case "things not in origin"
semantics only when one and only one positive ref is given, and
no number (e.g. "git format-patch -4 origin") was specified, and
used the general revision range semantics for everything else.
This narrows the special case a bit more, by making:
git format-patch --root this_version
to show everything that leads to the named commit.
More importantly, document the two different semantics better.
The generic revision range semantics came later and bolted on
without being clearly documented.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We used to trigger the special case "things not in origin"
semantics only when one and only one positive ref is given, and
no number (e.g. "git format-patch -4 origin") was specified, and
used the general revision range semantics for everything else.
This narrows the special case a bit more, by making:
git format-patch --root this_version
to show everything that leads to the named commit.
More importantly, document the two different semantics better.
The generic revision range semantics came later and bolted on
without being clearly documented.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Porcelain level "log" family should recurse when diffing.
Most notably, "git log --name-status" stopped at top level
directory changes without "-r" option.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most notably, "git log --name-status" stopped at top level
directory changes without "-r" option.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-merge: do up-to-date check also for all strategies
This clarifies the logic to omit fast-forward check and omit
trivial merge before running the specified strategy.
The "index_merge" variable started out as a flag to say "do not
do anything clever", but when recursive was changed to skip the
trivial merge, the semantics were changed and the variable alone
does not make sense anymore.
This splits the variable into two, allow_fast_forward (which is
almost always true, and avoids making a merge commit when the
other commit is a descendant of our branch, but is set to false
for ours and subtree) and allow_trivial_merge (which is false
for ours, recursive and subtree).
Unlike the earlier implementation, the "ours" strategy allows an
up-to-date condition. When we are up-to-date, the result will
be our commit, and by definition, we will have our tree as the
result.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This clarifies the logic to omit fast-forward check and omit
trivial merge before running the specified strategy.
The "index_merge" variable started out as a flag to say "do not
do anything clever", but when recursive was changed to skip the
trivial merge, the semantics were changed and the variable alone
does not make sense anymore.
This splits the variable into two, allow_fast_forward (which is
almost always true, and avoids making a merge commit when the
other commit is a descendant of our branch, but is set to false
for ours and subtree) and allow_trivial_merge (which is false
for ours, recursive and subtree).
Unlike the earlier implementation, the "ours" strategy allows an
up-to-date condition. When we are up-to-date, the result will
be our commit, and by definition, we will have our tree as the
result.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git --bare cmd: do not unconditionally nuke GIT_DIR
"GIT_DIR=some.where git --bare cmd" and worse yet
"git --git-dir=some.where --bare cmd" were very confusing. They
both ignored git-dir specified, and instead made $cwd as GIT_DIR.
This changes --bare not to override existing GIT_DIR.
This has been like this for a long time. Let's hope nobody sane
relied on this insane behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"GIT_DIR=some.where git --bare cmd" and worse yet
"git --git-dir=some.where --bare cmd" were very confusing. They
both ignored git-dir specified, and instead made $cwd as GIT_DIR.
This changes --bare not to override existing GIT_DIR.
This has been like this for a long time. Let's hope nobody sane
relied on this insane behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix initialization of a bare repository
Here is my attempt to fix this with a minimally intrusive patch.
* As "git --bare init" cannot tell if it was called with --bare or
just "GIT_DIR=. git init", I added an explicit assignment of
is_bare_repository_cfg on the codepath for "git --bare".
* GIT_WORK_TREE alone without GIT_DIR does not make any sense,
nor GIT_WORK_TREE with an explicit "git --bare". Catch that
mistake. It might make sense to move this check to "git.c"
side as well, but I tried to shoot for the minimum change for
now.
* Some scripts, especially from the olden days, rely on
traditional GIT_DIR behaviour in "git init". Namely, these
are some notable patterns:
(create a bare repository)
- mkdir some.git && cd some.git && GIT_DIR=. git init
- mkdir some.git && cd some.git && git --bare init
(create a non-bare repository)
- mkdir .git && GIT_DIR=.git git init
- mkdir .git && GIT_DIR=`pwd`/.git git init
This comes with a new test script and also passes the existing
test suite, but there may be cases that are still broken with
the current tip of master and this patch does not yet fix. I'd
appreciate help in straightening this mess out.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Here is my attempt to fix this with a minimally intrusive patch.
* As "git --bare init" cannot tell if it was called with --bare or
just "GIT_DIR=. git init", I added an explicit assignment of
is_bare_repository_cfg on the codepath for "git --bare".
* GIT_WORK_TREE alone without GIT_DIR does not make any sense,
nor GIT_WORK_TREE with an explicit "git --bare". Catch that
mistake. It might make sense to move this check to "git.c"
side as well, but I tried to shoot for the minimum change for
now.
* Some scripts, especially from the olden days, rely on
traditional GIT_DIR behaviour in "git init". Namely, these
are some notable patterns:
(create a bare repository)
- mkdir some.git && cd some.git && GIT_DIR=. git init
- mkdir some.git && cd some.git && git --bare init
(create a non-bare repository)
- mkdir .git && GIT_DIR=.git git init
- mkdir .git && GIT_DIR=`pwd`/.git git init
This comes with a new test script and also passes the existing
test suite, but there may be cases that are still broken with
the current tip of master and this patch does not yet fix. I'd
appreciate help in straightening this mess out.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
name-rev: Fix non-shortest description
Uwe Kleine-König noticed that under certain circumstances, name-rev
picked a non-optimal tag. Jeff King analyzed that name-rev only
takes into account the number of merge traversals, and then the
_last_ number in the description.
As an easy way to fix it, use a weighting factor for merge traversals:
A merge traversal is now made 65535 times more expensive than a
first-parent traversal.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Uwe Kleine-König noticed that under certain circumstances, name-rev
picked a non-optimal tag. Jeff King analyzed that name-rev only
takes into account the number of merge traversals, and then the
_last_ number in the description.
As an easy way to fix it, use a weighting factor for merge traversals:
A merge traversal is now made 65535 times more expensive than a
first-parent traversal.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Describe two-dot and three-dot notation for diff endpoints.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-tag(1): Remove duplicate text
Options -d, -l, -v have already been explained in OPTIONS below.
Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Options -d, -l, -v have already been explained in OPTIONS below.
Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitweb: Lift any characters restriction on searched strings
Everything is already fully quoted along the way so I believe this to be
unnecessary at this point. It would pose trouble for regexp searches.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Everything is already fully quoted along the way so I believe this to be
unnecessary at this point. It would pose trouble for regexp searches.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
RelNotes draft for 1.5.3 update.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui
* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui:
git-gui: Correct 'git gui blame' in a subdirectory
git-gui: Do not offer to stage three-way diff hunks into the index
git-gui: Refactor diff pane popup support for future improvements
git-gui: Fix "unoptimized loading" to not cause git-gui to crash
git-gui: Paper bag fix "Stage Hunk For Commit" in diff context menu
git-gui: Allow git-merge to use branch names in conflict markers
git-gui: Fix window manager problems on ion3
* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui:
git-gui: Correct 'git gui blame' in a subdirectory
git-gui: Do not offer to stage three-way diff hunks into the index
git-gui: Refactor diff pane popup support for future improvements
git-gui: Fix "unoptimized loading" to not cause git-gui to crash
git-gui: Paper bag fix "Stage Hunk For Commit" in diff context menu
git-gui: Allow git-merge to use branch names in conflict markers
git-gui: Fix window manager problems on ion3
When nothing to git-commit, honor the git-status color setting.
Instead of disabling color all of the time during a git-commit, allow
the user's config preference in the situation where there is nothing
to commit. In this situation, the status is printed to the terminal
and not sent to COMMIT_EDITMSG, so honoring the status color setting
is expected.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of disabling color all of the time during a git-commit, allow
the user's config preference in the situation where there is nothing
to commit. In this situation, the status is printed to the terminal
and not sent to COMMIT_EDITMSG, so honoring the status color setting
is expected.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitweb: Fix searchbox positioning
Currently, searchbox is CSS'd to have position: absolute, which has the
unfortunate consequence that if the viewport is too small and can't fit
into the page width together with the navbar, it gets overlapped and part
of the navbar gets obscured. This makes searchbox float: right instead,
thus the navbar simply gets wrapped.
Discovered and fix pointed out by Michael Olson <mwolson@gnu.org>.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, searchbox is CSS'd to have position: absolute, which has the
unfortunate consequence that if the viewport is too small and can't fit
into the page width together with the navbar, it gets overlapped and part
of the navbar gets obscured. This makes searchbox float: right instead,
thus the navbar simply gets wrapped.
Discovered and fix pointed out by Michael Olson <mwolson@gnu.org>.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'master' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/git
* 'master' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/git:
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
user-manual: fix incorrect header level
user-manual: use pithier example commit
user-manual: introduce the word "commit" earlier
user-manual: minor editing for conciseness
user-manual: edit "ignoring files" for conciseness
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
* 'master' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/git:
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
user-manual: fix incorrect header level
user-manual: use pithier example commit
user-manual: introduce the word "commit" earlier
user-manual: minor editing for conciseness
user-manual: edit "ignoring files" for conciseness
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
Merge branch 'maint'
Conflicts:
Documentation/user-manual.txt
Conflicts:
Documentation/user-manual.txt
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
user-manual: fix incorrect header level
This section is a subsection of the "Examples" section.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
This section is a subsection of the "Examples" section.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: use pithier example commit
Actually, we should have a competition for the favorite example commit.
Criteria:
- length: one-line changes with one-line comments preferred,
and no long lines
- significance/memorability
- comic value
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Actually, we should have a competition for the favorite example commit.
Criteria:
- length: one-line changes with one-line comments preferred,
and no long lines
- significance/memorability
- comic value
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: introduce the word "commit" earlier
Use the word "commit" as a synonym for "version" from the start.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Use the word "commit" as a synonym for "version" from the start.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: minor editing for conciseness
Just cutting out a few unnecessary words.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Just cutting out a few unnecessary words.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>