Export matches_pack_name() and fix its return value
The function sounds boolean; make it behave as one, not "0 for
success, non-zero for failure".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The function sounds boolean; make it behave as one, not "0 for
success, non-zero for failure".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Invoke "git gc --auto" from commit, merge, am and rebase.
The point of auto gc is to pack new objects created in loose
format, so a good rule of thumb is where we do update-ref after
creating a new commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The point of auto gc is to pack new objects created in loose
format, so a good rule of thumb is where we do update-ref after
creating a new commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Implement git gc --auto
This implements a new option "git gc --auto". When gc.auto is
set to a positive value, and the object database has accumulated
roughly that many number of loose objects, this runs a
lightweight version of "git gc". The primary difference from
the full "git gc" is that it does not pass "-a" option to "git
repack", which means we do not try to repack _everything_, but
only repack incrementally. We still do "git prune-packed". The
default threshold is arbitrarily set by yours truly to:
- not trigger it for fully unpacked git v0.99 history;
- do trigger it for fully unpacked git v1.0.0 history;
- not trigger it for incremental update to git v1.0.0 starting
from fully packed git v0.99 history.
This patch does not add invocation of the "auto repacking". It
is left to key Porcelain commands that could produce tons of
loose objects to add a call to "git gc --auto" after they are
done their work.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This implements a new option "git gc --auto". When gc.auto is
set to a positive value, and the object database has accumulated
roughly that many number of loose objects, this runs a
lightweight version of "git gc". The primary difference from
the full "git gc" is that it does not pass "-a" option to "git
repack", which means we do not try to repack _everything_, but
only repack incrementally. We still do "git prune-packed". The
default threshold is arbitrarily set by yours truly to:
- not trigger it for fully unpacked git v0.99 history;
- do trigger it for fully unpacked git v1.0.0 history;
- not trigger it for incremental update to git v1.0.0 starting
from fully packed git v0.99 history.
This patch does not add invocation of the "auto repacking". It
is left to key Porcelain commands that could produce tons of
loose objects to add a call to "git gc --auto" after they are
done their work.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git/git-p4
* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git/git-p4:
git-p4: Added support for automatically importing newly appearing perforce branches.
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the (duplicated) code for turning a branch into a git ref (for example foo -> refs/remotes/p4/<project>/foo) into a separate method.
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the code for the initial #head or revision import into a separate function, out of P4Sync.run.
git-p4: Cleanup; Turn self.revision into a function local variable (it's not used anywhere outside the function).
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the code to import a list of p4 changes using fast-import into a separate member function of P4Sync.
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the code for getting a sorted list of p4 changes for a list of given depot paths into a standalone method.
git-p4: After submission to p4 always synchronize from p4 again (into refs/remotes). Whether to rebase HEAD or not is still left as question to the end-user.
git-p4: Always call 'p4 sync ...' before submitting to Perforce.
* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git/git-p4:
git-p4: Added support for automatically importing newly appearing perforce branches.
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the (duplicated) code for turning a branch into a git ref (for example foo -> refs/remotes/p4/<project>/foo) into a separate method.
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the code for the initial #head or revision import into a separate function, out of P4Sync.run.
git-p4: Cleanup; Turn self.revision into a function local variable (it's not used anywhere outside the function).
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the code to import a list of p4 changes using fast-import into a separate member function of P4Sync.
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the code for getting a sorted list of p4 changes for a list of given depot paths into a standalone method.
git-p4: After submission to p4 always synchronize from p4 again (into refs/remotes). Whether to rebase HEAD or not is still left as question to the end-user.
git-p4: Always call 'p4 sync ...' before submitting to Perforce.
Merge branch 'maint'
* maint:
Include a git-push example for creating a remote branch
Cleanup unnecessary file modifications in t1400-update-ref
Makefile: Add cache-tree.h to the headers list
Don't allow contrib/workdir/git-new-workdir to trash existing dirs
git-apply: do not read past the end of buffer
* maint:
Include a git-push example for creating a remote branch
Cleanup unnecessary file modifications in t1400-update-ref
Makefile: Add cache-tree.h to the headers list
Don't allow contrib/workdir/git-new-workdir to trash existing dirs
git-apply: do not read past the end of buffer
Include a git-push example for creating a remote branch
Many users get confused when `git push origin master:foo` works
when foo already exists on the remote repository but are confused
when foo doesn't exist as a branch and this form does not create
the branch foo.
This new example highlights the trick of including refs/heads/
in front of the desired branch name to create a branch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Many users get confused when `git push origin master:foo` works
when foo already exists on the remote repository but are confused
when foo doesn't exist as a branch and this form does not create
the branch foo.
This new example highlights the trick of including refs/heads/
in front of the desired branch name to create a branch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cleanup unnecessary file modifications in t1400-update-ref
Kristian Høgsberg pointed out that the two file modifications
we were doing during the 'creating initial files' step are not even
used within the test suite. This was actually confusing as we do
not even need these changes for the tests to pass. All that really
matters here is the specific commit dates are used so that these
appear in the branch's reflog, and that the dates are different so
that the branch will update when asked and the reflog entry is
also updated. There is no need for the file modification.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Kristian Høgsberg pointed out that the two file modifications
we were doing during the 'creating initial files' step are not even
used within the test suite. This was actually confusing as we do
not even need these changes for the tests to pass. All that really
matters here is the specific commit dates are used so that these
appear in the branch's reflog, and that the dates are different so
that the branch will update when asked and the reflog entry is
also updated. There is no need for the file modification.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Makefile: Add cache-tree.h to the headers list
The dependency was missing.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The dependency was missing.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't allow contrib/workdir/git-new-workdir to trash existing dirs
Recently I found that doing a sequence like the following:
git-new-workdir a b
...
git-new-workdir a b
by accident will cause a (and now also b) to have an infinite cycle
in its refs directory. This is caused by git-new-workdir trying
to create the "refs" symlink over again, only during the second
time it is being created within a's refs directory and is now also
pointing back at a's refs.
This causes confusion in git as suddenly branches are named things
like "refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/heads/foo" instead of the
more commonly accepted "refs/heads/foo". Plenty of commands start
to see ambiguous ref names and others just take ages to compute.
git-clone has the same safety check, so git-new-workdir should
behave just like it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Recently I found that doing a sequence like the following:
git-new-workdir a b
...
git-new-workdir a b
by accident will cause a (and now also b) to have an infinite cycle
in its refs directory. This is caused by git-new-workdir trying
to create the "refs" symlink over again, only during the second
time it is being created within a's refs directory and is now also
pointing back at a's refs.
This causes confusion in git as suddenly branches are named things
like "refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/heads/foo" instead of the
more commonly accepted "refs/heads/foo". Plenty of commands start
to see ambiguous ref names and others just take ages to compute.
git-clone has the same safety check, so git-new-workdir should
behave just like it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-apply: do not read past the end of buffer
When the preimage we are patching is shorter than what the patch
text expects, we tried to match the buffer contents at the
"original" line with the fragment in full, without checking we
have enough data to match in the preimage. This caused the size
of a later memmove() to wrap around and attempt to scribble
almost the entire address space. Not good.
The code that follows the part this patch touches tries to match
the fragment with line offsets. Curiously, that code does not
have the problem --- it guards against reading past the end of
the preimage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the preimage we are patching is shorter than what the patch
text expects, we tried to match the buffer contents at the
"original" line with the fragment in full, without checking we
have enough data to match in the preimage. This caused the size
of a later memmove() to wrap around and attempt to scribble
almost the entire address space. Not good.
The code that follows the part this patch touches tries to match
the fragment with line offsets. Curiously, that code does not
have the problem --- it guards against reading past the end of
the preimage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'ds/sendmail'
* ds/sendmail:
send-email: Add support for SSL and SMTP-AUTH
* ds/sendmail:
send-email: Add support for SSL and SMTP-AUTH
Function for updating refs.
A function intended to be called from builtins updating refs
by locking them before write, specially those that came from
scripts using "git update-ref".
[jc: with minor fixups]
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A function intended to be called from builtins updating refs
by locking them before write, specially those that came from
scripts using "git update-ref".
[jc: with minor fixups]
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-p4: Added support for automatically importing newly appearing perforce branches.
If a change in a p4 "branch" appears that hasn't seen any previous commit and
that has a known branch mapping we now try to import it properly. First we
find the p4 change of the source branch that the new p4 branch is based on. Then
we using git rev-list --bisect to locate the corresponding git commit to that change.
Finally we import all changes in the new p4 branch up to the current change and resume
with the regular import.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
If a change in a p4 "branch" appears that hasn't seen any previous commit and
that has a known branch mapping we now try to import it properly. First we
find the p4 change of the source branch that the new p4 branch is based on. Then
we using git rev-list --bisect to locate the corresponding git commit to that change.
Finally we import all changes in the new p4 branch up to the current change and resume
with the regular import.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the (duplicated) code for turning a branch into a git ref (for example foo -> refs/remotes/p4/<project>/foo) into a separate method.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
17 years agogit-p4: Cleanup; moved the code for the initial #head or revision import into a separ...
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the code for the initial #head or revision import into a separate function, out of P4Sync.run.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
git-p4: Cleanup; Turn self.revision into a function local variable (it's not used anywhere outside the function).
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the code to import a list of p4 changes using fast-import into a separate member function of P4Sync.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the code for getting a sorted list of p4 changes for a list of given depot paths into a standalone method.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
git-p4: After submission to p4 always synchronize from p4 again (into refs/remotes). Whether to rebase HEAD or not is still left as question to the end-user.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
git-p4: Always call 'p4 sync ...' before submitting to Perforce.
Acked-by: Marius Storm-Olsen <marius@trolltech.com>
Acked-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago@kde.org>
Acked-by: Marius Storm-Olsen <marius@trolltech.com>
Acked-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago@kde.org>
send-email: Add support for SSL and SMTP-AUTH
Allows username and password to be given using --smtp-user
and --smtp-pass. SSL use is flagged by --smtp-ssl. These are
backed by corresponding defaults in the git configuration file.
This implements Junio's 'mail identity' suggestion in a slightly
more generalised manner. --identity=$identity, backed by
sendemail.identity indicates that the configuration subsection
[sendemail "$identity"] should take priority over the [sendemail]
section for all configuration values.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Stockwell <doug@11011.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allows username and password to be given using --smtp-user
and --smtp-pass. SSL use is flagged by --smtp-ssl. These are
backed by corresponding defaults in the git configuration file.
This implements Junio's 'mail identity' suggestion in a slightly
more generalised manner. --identity=$identity, backed by
sendemail.identity indicates that the configuration subsection
[sendemail "$identity"] should take priority over the [sendemail]
section for all configuration values.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Stockwell <doug@11011.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Start 1.5.4 cycle
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GIT 1.5.3.1: obsolete git-p4 in RPM spec file.
HPA noticed that yum does not like the newer git RPM set; it turns out
that we do not ship git-p4 anymore but existing installations do not
realize the package is gone if we do not tell anything about it.
David Kastrup suggests using Obsoletes in the spec file of the new
RPM to replace the old package, so here is a try.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
HPA noticed that yum does not like the newer git RPM set; it turns out
that we do not ship git-p4 anymore but existing installations do not
realize the package is gone if we do not tell anything about it.
David Kastrup suggests using Obsoletes in the spec file of the new
RPM to replace the old package, so here is a try.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Typofix: 1.5.3 release notes
GIT 1.5.3
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'jp/send-email-cc'
* jp/send-email-cc:
git-send-email --cc-cmd
* jp/send-email-cc:
git-send-email --cc-cmd
Mention -m as an abbreviation for --merge
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update my contact address as the maintainer.
Documentation: minor AsciiDoc mark-up fixes.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
URL: allow port specification in ssh:// URLs
Allow port specification in ssh:// URLs in the
usual notation:
ssh://[user@]host.domain[:<port>]/<path>
This allows git to be used over ssh-tunneling
networks.
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allow port specification in ssh:// URLs in the
usual notation:
ssh://[user@]host.domain[:<port>]/<path>
This allows git to be used over ssh-tunneling
networks.
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Avoid one-or-more (\+) non BRE in sed scripts.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase -m: Fix incorrect short-logs of already applied commits.
When a topic branch is rebased, some of whose commits are already
cherry-picked upstream:
o--X--A--B--Y <- master
\
A--B--Z <- topic
then 'git rebase -m master' would report:
Already applied: 0001 Y
Already applied: 0002 Y
With this fix it reports the expected:
Already applied: 0001 A
Already applied: 0002 B
As an added bonus, this change also avoids 'echo' of a commit message,
which might contain escapements.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a topic branch is rebased, some of whose commits are already
cherry-picked upstream:
o--X--A--B--Y <- master
\
A--B--Z <- topic
then 'git rebase -m master' would report:
Already applied: 0001 Y
Already applied: 0002 Y
With this fix it reports the expected:
Already applied: 0001 A
Already applied: 0002 B
As an added bonus, this change also avoids 'echo' of a commit message,
which might contain escapements.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-diff: resurrect the traditional empty "diff --git" behaviour
The warning message to suggest "Consider running git-status" from
"git-diff" that we experimented with during the 1.5.3 cycle turns
out to be a bad idea. It robbed cache-dirty information from people
who valued it, while still asking users to run "update-index --refresh".
It was hoped that the new behaviour would at least have some educational
value, but not showing the cache-dirty paths like before meant that the
user would not even know easily which paths were cache-dirty, and it
made the need to refresh the index look like even more unnecessary chore.
This commit reinstates the traditional behaviour, but with a twist.
By default, the empty "diff --git" output is totally squelched out
from "git diff" output. At the end of the command, it automatically
runs "update-index --refresh" as needed, without even bothering the
user. In other words, people who do not care about the cache-dirtyness
do not even have to see the warning.
The traditional behaviour to see the stat-dirty output and to bypassing
the overhead of content comparison can be specified by setting the
configuration variable diff.autorefreshindex to false.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The warning message to suggest "Consider running git-status" from
"git-diff" that we experimented with during the 1.5.3 cycle turns
out to be a bad idea. It robbed cache-dirty information from people
who valued it, while still asking users to run "update-index --refresh".
It was hoped that the new behaviour would at least have some educational
value, but not showing the cache-dirty paths like before meant that the
user would not even know easily which paths were cache-dirty, and it
made the need to refresh the index look like even more unnecessary chore.
This commit reinstates the traditional behaviour, but with a twist.
By default, the empty "diff --git" output is totally squelched out
from "git diff" output. At the end of the command, it automatically
runs "update-index --refresh" as needed, without even bothering the
user. In other words, people who do not care about the cache-dirtyness
do not even have to see the warning.
The traditional behaviour to see the stat-dirty output and to bypassing
the overhead of content comparison can be specified by setting the
configuration variable diff.autorefreshindex to false.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-tag: Fix -l option to use better shell style globs.
This patch removes certain behaviour of "git tag -l foo", currently
listing every tag name having "foo" as a substring. The same
thing now could be achieved doing "git tag -l '*foo*'".
This feature was added recently when git-tag.sh got the -n option
for showing tag annotations, because that commit also replaced the
old "grep pattern" behaviour with a more preferable "shell pattern"
behaviour (although slightly modified as you can see).
Thus, the following builtin-tag.c implemented it in order to
ensure that tests were passing unchanged with both programs.
Since common "shell patterns" match names with a given substring
_only_ when * is inserted before and after (as in "*substring*"), and
the "plain" behaviour cannot be achieved easily with the current
implementation, this is mostly the right thing to do, in order to
make it more flexible and consistent.
Tests for "git tag" were also changed to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch removes certain behaviour of "git tag -l foo", currently
listing every tag name having "foo" as a substring. The same
thing now could be achieved doing "git tag -l '*foo*'".
This feature was added recently when git-tag.sh got the -n option
for showing tag annotations, because that commit also replaced the
old "grep pattern" behaviour with a more preferable "shell pattern"
behaviour (although slightly modified as you can see).
Thus, the following builtin-tag.c implemented it in order to
ensure that tests were passing unchanged with both programs.
Since common "shell patterns" match names with a given substring
_only_ when * is inserted before and after (as in "*substring*"), and
the "plain" behaviour cannot be achieved easily with the current
implementation, this is mostly the right thing to do, in order to
make it more flexible and consistent.
Tests for "git tag" were also changed to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-svn: fix dcommit clobbering upstream when committing multiple changes
Although dcommit could detect if the first commit in the series
would conflict with the HEAD revision in SVN, it could not
detect conflicts in further commits it made.
Now we rebase each uncommitted change after each revision is
committed to SVN to ensure that we are up-to-date. git-rebase
will bail out on conflict errors if our next change cannot be
applied and committed to SVN cleanly, preventing accidental
clobbering of changes on the SVN-side.
--no-rebase users will have trouble with this, and are thus
warned if they are committing more than one commit. Fixing this
for (hopefully uncommon) --no-rebase users would be more complex
and will probably happen at a later date.
Thanks to David Watson for finding this and the original test.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Although dcommit could detect if the first commit in the series
would conflict with the HEAD revision in SVN, it could not
detect conflicts in further commits it made.
Now we rebase each uncommitted change after each revision is
committed to SVN to ensure that we are up-to-date. git-rebase
will bail out on conflict errors if our next change cannot be
applied and committed to SVN cleanly, preventing accidental
clobbering of changes on the SVN-side.
--no-rebase users will have trouble with this, and are thus
warned if they are committing more than one commit. Fixing this
for (hopefully uncommon) --no-rebase users would be more complex
and will probably happen at a later date.
Thanks to David Watson for finding this and the original test.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-svn: Protect against "diff.color = true".
If the configuration of the user has "diff.color = true", the
output from "log" we invoke internally added color codes, which
broke the parser.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tested-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
If the configuration of the user has "diff.color = true", the
output from "log" we invoke internally added color codes, which
broke the parser.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tested-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
filter-branch: introduce convenience function "skip_commit"
With this function, a commit filter can leave out unwanted commits
(such as temporary commits). It does _not_ undo the changeset
corresponding to that commit, but it _skips_ the revision. IOW
no tree object is changed by this.
If you like to commit early and often, but want to filter out all
intermediate commits, marked by "@@@" in the commit message, you can
now do this with
git filter-branch --commit-filter '
if git cat-file commit $GIT_COMMIT | grep '@@@' > /dev/null;
then
skip_commit "$@";
else
git commit-tree "$@";
fi' newbranch
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With this function, a commit filter can leave out unwanted commits
(such as temporary commits). It does _not_ undo the changeset
corresponding to that commit, but it _skips_ the revision. IOW
no tree object is changed by this.
If you like to commit early and often, but want to filter out all
intermediate commits, marked by "@@@" in the commit message, you can
now do this with
git filter-branch --commit-filter '
if git cat-file commit $GIT_COMMIT | grep '@@@' > /dev/null;
then
skip_commit "$@";
else
git commit-tree "$@";
fi' newbranch
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
filter-branch: provide the convenience functions also for commit filters
Move the convenience functions to the top of git-filter-branch.sh, and
return from the script when the environment variable SOURCE_FUNCTIONS is
set.
By sourcing git-filter-branch with that variable set automatically, all
commit filters may access the convenience functions like "map".
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Move the convenience functions to the top of git-filter-branch.sh, and
return from the script when the environment variable SOURCE_FUNCTIONS is
set.
By sourcing git-filter-branch with that variable set automatically, all
commit filters may access the convenience functions like "map".
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase -i: mention the option to split commits in the man page
The interactive mode of rebase can be used to split commits. Tell the
interested parties about it, with a dedicated section in the man page.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The interactive mode of rebase can be used to split commits. Tell the
interested parties about it, with a dedicated section in the man page.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
filter-branch: fix remnants of old syntax in documentation
Some time ago, filter-branch's syntax changed so that more than one
ref can be rewritten at the same time. This involved the removal of
the ref name for the result; instead, the refs are rewritten in-place.
This updates the last leftovers in the documentation to reflect the
new behavior.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some time ago, filter-branch's syntax changed so that more than one
ref can be rewritten at the same time. This involved the removal of
the ref name for the result; instead, the refs are rewritten in-place.
This updates the last leftovers in the documentation to reflect the
new behavior.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach bash about completing arguments for git-tag
Lately I have been doing a lot of calls to `git tag -d` and also to
`git tag -v`. In both such cases being able to complete the names
of existing tags saves the fingers some typing effort. We now look
for the -d or -v option to git-tag in the bash completion support
and offer up existing tag names as possible choices for these.
When creating a new tag we now also offer bash completion support
for the second argument to git-tag (the object to be tagged) as this
can often be a specific existing branch name and is not necessarily
the current HEAD.
If the -f option is being used to recreate an existing tag we now
also offer completion support on the existing tag names for the
first argument of git-tag, helping to the user to reselect the
prior tag name that they are trying to replace.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Lately I have been doing a lot of calls to `git tag -d` and also to
`git tag -v`. In both such cases being able to complete the names
of existing tags saves the fingers some typing effort. We now look
for the -d or -v option to git-tag in the bash completion support
and offer up existing tag names as possible choices for these.
When creating a new tag we now also offer bash completion support
for the second argument to git-tag (the object to be tagged) as this
can often be a specific existing branch name and is not necessarily
the current HEAD.
If the -f option is being used to recreate an existing tag we now
also offer completion support on the existing tag names for the
first argument of git-tag, helping to the user to reselect the
prior tag name that they are trying to replace.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Hopefully the final update to draft release notes for 1.5.3.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make "git-log --" without paths behave the same as "git-log" without --
"git log" family of commands, even when run from a subdirectory,
do not limit the revision range with the current directory as
the path limiter, but with double-dash without any paths after
it, i.e. "git log --" do so. It was a mistake to have a
difference between "git log --" and "git log" introduced in
commit ae563542bf10fa8c33abd2a354e4b28aca4264d7 (First cut at
libifying revlist generation).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git log" family of commands, even when run from a subdirectory,
do not limit the revision range with the current directory as
the path limiter, but with double-dash without any paths after
it, i.e. "git log --" do so. It was a mistake to have a
difference between "git log --" and "git log" introduced in
commit ae563542bf10fa8c33abd2a354e4b28aca4264d7 (First cut at
libifying revlist generation).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-init: autodetect core.symlinks
We already autodetect if filemode is reliable on the filesystem
to deal with VFAT and friends. Do the same for symbolic link
support.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We already autodetect if filemode is reliable on the filesystem
to deal with VFAT and friends. Do the same for symbolic link
support.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make git-archimport log entries more consistent
When appending the "git-archimport-id:" line to the end of log entries,
git-archimport would use two blank lines as a separator when there was no
body in the arch log (only a Summary: line), and zero blank lines when there
was a body (making it hard to see the break between the actual log message
and the git-archimport-id: line).
This patch makes git-archimport generate one blank line as a separator in all
cases.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When appending the "git-archimport-id:" line to the end of log entries,
git-archimport would use two blank lines as a separator when there was no
body in the arch log (only a Summary: line), and zero blank lines when there
was a body (making it hard to see the break between the actual log message
and the git-archimport-id: line).
This patch makes git-archimport generate one blank line as a separator in all
cases.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
fix same sized delta logic
The code favoring shallower deltas when size is equal was triggered
only when previous delta was also cached. There should be no relation
between cached deltas and same sized deltas.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The code favoring shallower deltas when size is equal was triggered
only when previous delta was also cached. There should be no relation
between cached deltas and same sized deltas.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
filter-branch: make sure orig_namespace ends with a single slash.
Later in a loop any existing ref whose path begins with it is
removed. It would be a disaster if you allowed it to say refs/head
for example.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Later in a loop any existing ref whose path begins with it is
removed. It would be a disaster if you allowed it to say refs/head
for example.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-filter-branch: document --original option
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-filter-branch: more detailed USAGE
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Makefile: do not allow gnu make to remove test-*.o files
It appears parallel build (-j) gets confused.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It appears parallel build (-j) gets confused.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Temporary fix for stack smashing in mailinfo
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fixing comment in merge strategies
Comments in both these strategies refer to the wrong number
of remotes
Signed-off-by: Tom Clarke <tom@u2i.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Comments in both these strategies refer to the wrong number
of remotes
Signed-off-by: Tom Clarke <tom@u2i.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
ls-files --error-unmatch: do not barf if the same pattern is given twice.
This is most visible when you do "git commit Makefile Makefile"; it
may be a stupid request, but that is not a reason to fail the command.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is most visible when you do "git commit Makefile Makefile"; it
may be a stupid request, but that is not a reason to fail the command.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'master' of git://git./gitk/gitk
* 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/gitk/gitk:
gitk: Fix bug causing undefined variable error when cherry-picking
* 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/gitk/gitk:
gitk: Fix bug causing undefined variable error when cherry-picking
completion: also complete git-log's --left-right and --cherry-pick option
Both --left-right and --cherry-pick are particularly long to type, so
help the user there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Both --left-right and --cherry-pick are particularly long to type, so
help the user there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitk: Fix bug causing undefined variable error when cherry-picking
When "Show nearby tags" is turned off and the user did a cherry-pick,
we were trying to access variables relating to the descendent/ancestor
tag & head computations in addnewchild though they hadn't been set.
This makes sure we don't do that. Reported by Johannes Sixt.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
When "Show nearby tags" is turned off and the user did a cherry-pick,
we were trying to access variables relating to the descendent/ancestor
tag & head computations in addnewchild though they hadn't been set.
This makes sure we don't do that. Reported by Johannes Sixt.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
git-daemon(1): assorted improvements.
Jari Aalto noticed a handful places in git-daemon documentation
that need to be improved.
* --inetd makes --pid-file to be ignored, in addition to --user
and --group
* receive-pack service was not described at all. We should, if
only to warn about the security implications of it.
* There was no example of per repository configuration.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jari Aalto noticed a handful places in git-daemon documentation
that need to be improved.
* --inetd makes --pid-file to be ignored, in addition to --user
and --group
* receive-pack service was not described at all. We should, if
only to warn about the security implications of it.
* There was no example of per repository configuration.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GIT 1.5.3-rc7
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-svn.txt: fix an obvious misspelling.
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git.el: Added colors for dark background
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
format-patch documentation: reword to hint "--root <one-commit>" more clearly
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'jc/logsemantics'
* jc/logsemantics:
"format-patch --root rev" is the way to show everything.
Porcelain level "log" family should recurse when diffing.
* jc/logsemantics:
"format-patch --root rev" is the way to show everything.
Porcelain level "log" family should recurse when diffing.
Documentation/git-diff: A..B and A...B cannot take tree-ishes
As pointed out by Linus, these notations require the endpoints
given by the end user to be commits. Clarify.
Also, three-dots in AsciiDoc are turned into ellipses unless
quoted with bq. Be careful.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As pointed out by Linus, these notations require the endpoints
given by the end user to be commits. Clarify.
Also, three-dots in AsciiDoc are turned into ellipses unless
quoted with bq. Be careful.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-add: Make the filename globbing note a bit clearer
I think the trick with Git-side filename globbing is important and perhaps
not that well known. Clarify a bit in git-add documentation what it means.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I think the trick with Git-side filename globbing is important and perhaps
not that well known. Clarify a bit in git-add documentation what it means.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-add: Make the "tried to add ignored file" error message less confusing
Currently the error message seems to imply (at least to me) that only
the listed files were withheld and the rest of the files was added to the
index, even though that's obviously not the case.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently the error message seems to imply (at least to me) that only
the listed files were withheld and the rest of the files was added to the
index, even though that's obviously not the case.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitweb: Fix escaping HTML of project owner in 'projects_list' and
'summary' views
This for example allows to put email address in the project owner
field in the projects index file (when $projects_list points to
a file, and not to a directory), in the form of:
path/to/repo.git Random+J+Developer+<random@developer.example.org>
Noticed-by: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'summary' views
This for example allows to put email address in the project owner
field in the projects index file (when $projects_list points to
a file, and not to a directory), in the form of:
path/to/repo.git Random+J+Developer+<random@developer.example.org>
Noticed-by: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"format-patch --root rev" is the way to show everything.
We used to trigger the special case "things not in origin"
semantics only when one and only one positive ref is given, and
no number (e.g. "git format-patch -4 origin") was specified, and
used the general revision range semantics for everything else.
This narrows the special case a bit more, by making:
git format-patch --root this_version
to show everything that leads to the named commit.
More importantly, document the two different semantics better.
The generic revision range semantics came later and bolted on
without being clearly documented.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We used to trigger the special case "things not in origin"
semantics only when one and only one positive ref is given, and
no number (e.g. "git format-patch -4 origin") was specified, and
used the general revision range semantics for everything else.
This narrows the special case a bit more, by making:
git format-patch --root this_version
to show everything that leads to the named commit.
More importantly, document the two different semantics better.
The generic revision range semantics came later and bolted on
without being clearly documented.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Porcelain level "log" family should recurse when diffing.
Most notably, "git log --name-status" stopped at top level
directory changes without "-r" option.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most notably, "git log --name-status" stopped at top level
directory changes without "-r" option.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-merge: do up-to-date check also for all strategies
This clarifies the logic to omit fast-forward check and omit
trivial merge before running the specified strategy.
The "index_merge" variable started out as a flag to say "do not
do anything clever", but when recursive was changed to skip the
trivial merge, the semantics were changed and the variable alone
does not make sense anymore.
This splits the variable into two, allow_fast_forward (which is
almost always true, and avoids making a merge commit when the
other commit is a descendant of our branch, but is set to false
for ours and subtree) and allow_trivial_merge (which is false
for ours, recursive and subtree).
Unlike the earlier implementation, the "ours" strategy allows an
up-to-date condition. When we are up-to-date, the result will
be our commit, and by definition, we will have our tree as the
result.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This clarifies the logic to omit fast-forward check and omit
trivial merge before running the specified strategy.
The "index_merge" variable started out as a flag to say "do not
do anything clever", but when recursive was changed to skip the
trivial merge, the semantics were changed and the variable alone
does not make sense anymore.
This splits the variable into two, allow_fast_forward (which is
almost always true, and avoids making a merge commit when the
other commit is a descendant of our branch, but is set to false
for ours and subtree) and allow_trivial_merge (which is false
for ours, recursive and subtree).
Unlike the earlier implementation, the "ours" strategy allows an
up-to-date condition. When we are up-to-date, the result will
be our commit, and by definition, we will have our tree as the
result.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git --bare cmd: do not unconditionally nuke GIT_DIR
"GIT_DIR=some.where git --bare cmd" and worse yet
"git --git-dir=some.where --bare cmd" were very confusing. They
both ignored git-dir specified, and instead made $cwd as GIT_DIR.
This changes --bare not to override existing GIT_DIR.
This has been like this for a long time. Let's hope nobody sane
relied on this insane behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"GIT_DIR=some.where git --bare cmd" and worse yet
"git --git-dir=some.where --bare cmd" were very confusing. They
both ignored git-dir specified, and instead made $cwd as GIT_DIR.
This changes --bare not to override existing GIT_DIR.
This has been like this for a long time. Let's hope nobody sane
relied on this insane behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix initialization of a bare repository
Here is my attempt to fix this with a minimally intrusive patch.
* As "git --bare init" cannot tell if it was called with --bare or
just "GIT_DIR=. git init", I added an explicit assignment of
is_bare_repository_cfg on the codepath for "git --bare".
* GIT_WORK_TREE alone without GIT_DIR does not make any sense,
nor GIT_WORK_TREE with an explicit "git --bare". Catch that
mistake. It might make sense to move this check to "git.c"
side as well, but I tried to shoot for the minimum change for
now.
* Some scripts, especially from the olden days, rely on
traditional GIT_DIR behaviour in "git init". Namely, these
are some notable patterns:
(create a bare repository)
- mkdir some.git && cd some.git && GIT_DIR=. git init
- mkdir some.git && cd some.git && git --bare init
(create a non-bare repository)
- mkdir .git && GIT_DIR=.git git init
- mkdir .git && GIT_DIR=`pwd`/.git git init
This comes with a new test script and also passes the existing
test suite, but there may be cases that are still broken with
the current tip of master and this patch does not yet fix. I'd
appreciate help in straightening this mess out.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Here is my attempt to fix this with a minimally intrusive patch.
* As "git --bare init" cannot tell if it was called with --bare or
just "GIT_DIR=. git init", I added an explicit assignment of
is_bare_repository_cfg on the codepath for "git --bare".
* GIT_WORK_TREE alone without GIT_DIR does not make any sense,
nor GIT_WORK_TREE with an explicit "git --bare". Catch that
mistake. It might make sense to move this check to "git.c"
side as well, but I tried to shoot for the minimum change for
now.
* Some scripts, especially from the olden days, rely on
traditional GIT_DIR behaviour in "git init". Namely, these
are some notable patterns:
(create a bare repository)
- mkdir some.git && cd some.git && GIT_DIR=. git init
- mkdir some.git && cd some.git && git --bare init
(create a non-bare repository)
- mkdir .git && GIT_DIR=.git git init
- mkdir .git && GIT_DIR=`pwd`/.git git init
This comes with a new test script and also passes the existing
test suite, but there may be cases that are still broken with
the current tip of master and this patch does not yet fix. I'd
appreciate help in straightening this mess out.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
name-rev: Fix non-shortest description
Uwe Kleine-König noticed that under certain circumstances, name-rev
picked a non-optimal tag. Jeff King analyzed that name-rev only
takes into account the number of merge traversals, and then the
_last_ number in the description.
As an easy way to fix it, use a weighting factor for merge traversals:
A merge traversal is now made 65535 times more expensive than a
first-parent traversal.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Uwe Kleine-König noticed that under certain circumstances, name-rev
picked a non-optimal tag. Jeff King analyzed that name-rev only
takes into account the number of merge traversals, and then the
_last_ number in the description.
As an easy way to fix it, use a weighting factor for merge traversals:
A merge traversal is now made 65535 times more expensive than a
first-parent traversal.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Describe two-dot and three-dot notation for diff endpoints.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-tag(1): Remove duplicate text
Options -d, -l, -v have already been explained in OPTIONS below.
Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Options -d, -l, -v have already been explained in OPTIONS below.
Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitweb: Lift any characters restriction on searched strings
Everything is already fully quoted along the way so I believe this to be
unnecessary at this point. It would pose trouble for regexp searches.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Everything is already fully quoted along the way so I believe this to be
unnecessary at this point. It would pose trouble for regexp searches.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
RelNotes draft for 1.5.3 update.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui
* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui:
git-gui: Correct 'git gui blame' in a subdirectory
git-gui: Do not offer to stage three-way diff hunks into the index
git-gui: Refactor diff pane popup support for future improvements
git-gui: Fix "unoptimized loading" to not cause git-gui to crash
git-gui: Paper bag fix "Stage Hunk For Commit" in diff context menu
git-gui: Allow git-merge to use branch names in conflict markers
git-gui: Fix window manager problems on ion3
* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui:
git-gui: Correct 'git gui blame' in a subdirectory
git-gui: Do not offer to stage three-way diff hunks into the index
git-gui: Refactor diff pane popup support for future improvements
git-gui: Fix "unoptimized loading" to not cause git-gui to crash
git-gui: Paper bag fix "Stage Hunk For Commit" in diff context menu
git-gui: Allow git-merge to use branch names in conflict markers
git-gui: Fix window manager problems on ion3
When nothing to git-commit, honor the git-status color setting.
Instead of disabling color all of the time during a git-commit, allow
the user's config preference in the situation where there is nothing
to commit. In this situation, the status is printed to the terminal
and not sent to COMMIT_EDITMSG, so honoring the status color setting
is expected.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of disabling color all of the time during a git-commit, allow
the user's config preference in the situation where there is nothing
to commit. In this situation, the status is printed to the terminal
and not sent to COMMIT_EDITMSG, so honoring the status color setting
is expected.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitweb: Fix searchbox positioning
Currently, searchbox is CSS'd to have position: absolute, which has the
unfortunate consequence that if the viewport is too small and can't fit
into the page width together with the navbar, it gets overlapped and part
of the navbar gets obscured. This makes searchbox float: right instead,
thus the navbar simply gets wrapped.
Discovered and fix pointed out by Michael Olson <mwolson@gnu.org>.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, searchbox is CSS'd to have position: absolute, which has the
unfortunate consequence that if the viewport is too small and can't fit
into the page width together with the navbar, it gets overlapped and part
of the navbar gets obscured. This makes searchbox float: right instead,
thus the navbar simply gets wrapped.
Discovered and fix pointed out by Michael Olson <mwolson@gnu.org>.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'master' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/git
* 'master' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/git:
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
user-manual: fix incorrect header level
user-manual: use pithier example commit
user-manual: introduce the word "commit" earlier
user-manual: minor editing for conciseness
user-manual: edit "ignoring files" for conciseness
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
* 'master' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/git:
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
user-manual: fix incorrect header level
user-manual: use pithier example commit
user-manual: introduce the word "commit" earlier
user-manual: minor editing for conciseness
user-manual: edit "ignoring files" for conciseness
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
Merge branch 'maint'
Conflicts:
Documentation/user-manual.txt
Conflicts:
Documentation/user-manual.txt
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
user-manual: fix incorrect header level
This section is a subsection of the "Examples" section.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
This section is a subsection of the "Examples" section.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: use pithier example commit
Actually, we should have a competition for the favorite example commit.
Criteria:
- length: one-line changes with one-line comments preferred,
and no long lines
- significance/memorability
- comic value
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Actually, we should have a competition for the favorite example commit.
Criteria:
- length: one-line changes with one-line comments preferred,
and no long lines
- significance/memorability
- comic value
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: introduce the word "commit" earlier
Use the word "commit" as a synonym for "version" from the start.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Use the word "commit" as a synonym for "version" from the start.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: minor editing for conciseness
Just cutting out a few unnecessary words.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Just cutting out a few unnecessary words.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
user-manual: edit "ignoring files" for conciseness
The immediate motivation for writing this section was to explain the
various places ignore patterns could be used. However, I still think
.gitignore is the case most people will want to learn about first. It
also makes it a bit more concrete to introduce ignore patterns in the
context of .gitignore first. And the existance of gitignore(5) relieves
the pressure to explain it all here.
So, stick to the .gitignore example, with only a brief mention of the
others, explain the syntax only by example, and leave the rest to
gitignore(5).
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
The immediate motivation for writing this section was to explain the
various places ignore patterns could be used. However, I still think
.gitignore is the case most people will want to learn about first. It
also makes it a bit more concrete to introduce ignore patterns in the
context of .gitignore first. And the existance of gitignore(5) relieves
the pressure to explain it all here.
So, stick to the .gitignore example, with only a brief mention of the
others, explain the syntax only by example, and leave the rest to
gitignore(5).
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Make usage documentation for git-add consistent.
The usage string for the executable was missing --refresh. In
addition, the documentation referred to "file", but the usage string
referred to "filepattern". Updated the documentation to
"filepattern", as git-add does handle patterns.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The usage string for the executable was missing --refresh. In
addition, the documentation referred to "file", but the usage string
referred to "filepattern". Updated the documentation to
"filepattern", as git-add does handle patterns.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make usage documentation for git-am consistent.
The usage information in git-am.sh now matches that of the
documentation.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The usage information in git-am.sh now matches that of the
documentation.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't segfault if we failed to inflate a packed delta
Under some types of packfile corruption the zlib stream holding the
data for a delta within a packfile may fail to inflate, due to say
a CRC failure within the compressed data itself. When this occurs
the unpack_compressed_entry function will return NULL as a signal to
the caller that the data is not available. Unfortunately we then
tried to use that NULL as though it referenced a memory location
where a delta was stored and tried to apply it to the delta base.
Loading a byte from the NULL address typically causes a SIGSEGV.
cate on #git noticed this failure in `git fsck --full` where the
call to verify_pack() first noticed that the packfile was corrupt
by finding that the packfile's SHA-1 did not match the raw data of
the file. After finding this fsck went ahead and tried to verify
every object within the packfile, even though the packfile was
already known to be bad. If we are going to shovel bad data at
the delta unpacking code, we better handle it correctly.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Under some types of packfile corruption the zlib stream holding the
data for a delta within a packfile may fail to inflate, due to say
a CRC failure within the compressed data itself. When this occurs
the unpack_compressed_entry function will return NULL as a signal to
the caller that the data is not available. Unfortunately we then
tried to use that NULL as though it referenced a memory location
where a delta was stored and tried to apply it to the delta base.
Loading a byte from the NULL address typically causes a SIGSEGV.
cate on #git noticed this failure in `git fsck --full` where the
call to verify_pack() first noticed that the packfile was corrupt
by finding that the packfile's SHA-1 did not match the raw data of
the file. After finding this fsck went ahead and tried to verify
every object within the packfile, even though the packfile was
already known to be bad. If we are going to shovel bad data at
the delta unpacking code, we better handle it correctly.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
pack-objects: check return value from read_sha1_file()
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
blame: check return value from read_sha1_file()
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-gui: Correct 'git gui blame' in a subdirectory
David Kastrup pointed out that the following sequence was not
working as we had intended:
$ cd lib
$ git gui blame console.tcl
fatal: cannot stat path lib/console.tcl: No such file or directory
The problem here was we disabled the chdir to the root of the
working tree when we are running with a "bare allowed" feature
such as blame or browser, but we still kept the prefix we found via
`git rev-parse --show-prefix`. This caused us to try and look for
the file "console.tcl" within the subdirectory but also include
the subdirectory's own path from the root of the working tree.
This is unlikely to succeed, unless the user just happened to have
a "lib/lib/console.tcl" file in the repository, in which case we
would produce the wrong result.
In the case of a bare repository we shouldn't get back a value from
`rev-parse --show-prefix`, so really $_prefix should only be set
to the non-empty string if we are in a working tree and we are in a
subdirectory of that working tree. If this is true we really want
to always be at the top level of the working tree, as all paths are
accessed as though they were relative to the top of the working tree.
Converting $_prefix to a ../ sequence is a fairly simple approach
to moving up the requisite levels.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
David Kastrup pointed out that the following sequence was not
working as we had intended:
$ cd lib
$ git gui blame console.tcl
fatal: cannot stat path lib/console.tcl: No such file or directory
The problem here was we disabled the chdir to the root of the
working tree when we are running with a "bare allowed" feature
such as blame or browser, but we still kept the prefix we found via
`git rev-parse --show-prefix`. This caused us to try and look for
the file "console.tcl" within the subdirectory but also include
the subdirectory's own path from the root of the working tree.
This is unlikely to succeed, unless the user just happened to have
a "lib/lib/console.tcl" file in the repository, in which case we
would produce the wrong result.
In the case of a bare repository we shouldn't get back a value from
`rev-parse --show-prefix`, so really $_prefix should only be set
to the non-empty string if we are in a working tree and we are in a
subdirectory of that working tree. If this is true we really want
to always be at the top level of the working tree, as all paths are
accessed as though they were relative to the top of the working tree.
Converting $_prefix to a ../ sequence is a fairly simple approach
to moving up the requisite levels.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-p4: Fix warnings about non-existant refs/remotes/p4/HEAD ref when running git-p4 sync the first time after a git clone.
Don't create the p4/HEAD symbolic ref if p4/master doesn't exist yet.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't create the p4/HEAD symbolic ref if p4/master doesn't exist yet.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-p4: Make 'git-p4 branches' work after an initial clone with git clone from an origin-updated repository.
After a clone with "git clone" of a repository the p4 branches are only in remotes/origin/p4/* and not in remotes/p4/*.
Separate the code for detection and creation out of the P4Sync command class into standalone methods and use them
from the P4Branches command.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After a clone with "git clone" of a repository the p4 branches are only in remotes/origin/p4/* and not in remotes/p4/*.
Separate the code for detection and creation out of the P4Sync command class into standalone methods and use them
from the P4Branches command.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation: Correct various misspellings and typos.
Fix minor typos throughout the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix minor typos throughout the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation: For consistency, use CVS instead of cvs.
When not referring to the cvs command, CVS makes more sense.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When not referring to the cvs command, CVS makes more sense.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix racy-git handling in git-write-tree.
After git-write-tree finishes computing the tree, it updates the
index so that later operations can take advantage of fully
populated cache tree.
However, anybody writing the index file has to mark the entries
that are racily clean. For each entry whose cached lstat(3)
data in the index exactly matches what is obtained from the
filesystem, if the timestamp on the index file was the same or
older than the modification timestamp of the file, the blob
contents and the work tree file, after convert_to_git(), need to
be compared, and if they are different, its index entry needs to
be marked not to match the lstat(3) data from the filesystem.
In order for this to work, convert_to_git() needs to work
correctly, which in turn means you need to read the config file
to get the settings of core.crlf and friends.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After git-write-tree finishes computing the tree, it updates the
index so that later operations can take advantage of fully
populated cache tree.
However, anybody writing the index file has to mark the entries
that are racily clean. For each entry whose cached lstat(3)
data in the index exactly matches what is obtained from the
filesystem, if the timestamp on the index file was the same or
older than the modification timestamp of the file, the blob
contents and the work tree file, after convert_to_git(), need to
be compared, and if they are different, its index entry needs to
be marked not to match the lstat(3) data from the filesystem.
In order for this to work, convert_to_git() needs to work
correctly, which in turn means you need to read the config file
to get the settings of core.crlf and friends.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase -i: fix squashing corner case
When squashing, rebase -i did not prevent fast forwards. This could
happen when picking some other commit than the first one, and then
squashing the first commit. So do not allow fast forwards when
squashing.
Noticed by Johannes Sixt.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When squashing, rebase -i did not prevent fast forwards. This could
happen when picking some other commit than the first one, and then
squashing the first commit. So do not allow fast forwards when
squashing.
Noticed by Johannes Sixt.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>