From: Christian Couder Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 13:53:14 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Documentation: bisect: change a few instances of "git-cmd" to "git cmd" X-Git-Tag: v1.6.1-rc1~7^2~16 X-Git-Url: https://git.tokkee.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5bcce8494a2ee09250404b8b086cbd62f9506703;p=git.git Documentation: bisect: change a few instances of "git-cmd" to "git cmd" Signed-off-by: Christian Couder Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt index c7981efcd..39034ec7d 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ on the subcommand: git bisect log git bisect run ... -This command uses 'git-rev-list --bisect' to help drive the +This command uses 'git rev-list --bisect' to help drive the binary search process to find which change introduced a bug, given an old "good" commit object name and a later "bad" commit object name. @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ $ git bisect visualize to see the currently remaining suspects in 'gitk'. `visualize` is a bit too long to type and `view` is provided as a synonym. -If 'DISPLAY' environment variable is not set, 'git-log' is used +If 'DISPLAY' environment variable is not set, 'git log' is used instead. You can even give command line options such as `-p` and `--stat`. @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ tweaks (e.g., s/#define DEBUG 0/#define DEBUG 1/ in a header file, or work around other problem this bisection is not interested in") applied to the revision being tested. -To cope with such a situation, after the inner 'git-bisect' finds the +To cope with such a situation, after the inner 'git bisect' finds the next revision to test, with the "run" script, you can apply that tweak before compiling, run the real test, and after the test decides if the revision (possibly with the needed tweaks) passed the test, rewind the