summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 88998e1)
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 88998e1)
author | Andrés J. Díaz <ajdiaz@connectical.com> | |
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:15:02 +0000 (13:15 +0200) | ||
committer | Florian Forster <octo@huhu.verplant.org> | |
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:57:05 +0000 (17:57 +0200) |
Hi Florian (et al)
> you're right, the (re-)allocation of the memory can probably be avoided
> if the function is turned into one with the following prototype:
> -- 8< --
> static int *ps_read_tasks (int pid,
> unsigned long *ret_num_proc,
> unsigned long *ret_num_lwp);
> -- >8 --
Mmm, why not something like: "static int ps_read_task(pid)"?
This returns the number of task for pid passed as argument.
(AFAIK the function only return the number ot threads), why
we need the ret_num_proc and the ret_num_lwp parameters?
My proposal is attached (code is always cleaner than explanations :P)
Regards,
Andres
Signed-off-by: Florian Forster <octo@huhu.verplant.org>
> you're right, the (re-)allocation of the memory can probably be avoided
> if the function is turned into one with the following prototype:
> -- 8< --
> static int *ps_read_tasks (int pid,
> unsigned long *ret_num_proc,
> unsigned long *ret_num_lwp);
> -- >8 --
Mmm, why not something like: "static int ps_read_task(pid)"?
This returns the number of task for pid passed as argument.
(AFAIK the function only return the number ot threads), why
we need the ret_num_proc and the ret_num_lwp parameters?
My proposal is attached (code is always cleaner than explanations :P)
Regards,
Andres
Signed-off-by: Florian Forster <octo@huhu.verplant.org>
src/processes.c | patch | blob | history |
diff --git a/src/processes.c b/src/processes.c
index 261accbcbc7582218c6f5744cb818beba533ffe8..8337f99a735137fa6ff799e104a7a6fe5b48303f 100644 (file)
--- a/src/processes.c
+++ b/src/processes.c
/* ------- additional functions for KERNEL_LINUX/HAVE_THREAD_INFO ------- */
#if KERNEL_LINUX
-static int *ps_read_tasks (int pid)
+static int ps_read_tasks (int pid)
{
- int *list = NULL;
- int list_size = 1; /* size of allocated space, in elements */
- int list_len = 0; /* number of currently used elements */
-
char dirname[64];
DIR *dh;
struct dirent *ent;
+ int count = 0;
ssnprintf (dirname, sizeof (dirname), "/proc/%i/task", pid);
if ((dh = opendir (dirname)) == NULL)
{
DEBUG ("Failed to open directory `%s'", dirname);
- return (NULL);
+ return (-1);
}
while ((ent = readdir (dh)) != NULL)
{
if (!isdigit (ent->d_name[0]))
continue;
-
- if ((list_len + 1) >= list_size)
- {
- int *new_ptr;
- int new_size = 2 * list_size;
- /* Comes in sizes: 2, 4, 8, 16, ... */
-
- new_ptr = (int *) realloc (list, (size_t) (sizeof (int) * new_size));
- if (new_ptr == NULL)
- {
- if (list != NULL)
- free (list);
- ERROR ("processes plugin: "
- "Failed to allocate more memory.");
- return (NULL);
- }
-
- list = new_ptr;
- list_size = new_size;
-
- memset (list + list_len, 0, sizeof (int) * (list_size - list_len));
- }
-
- list[list_len] = atoi (ent->d_name);
- if (list[list_len] != 0)
- list_len++;
+ else
+ count++;
}
-
closedir (dh);
- if (list_len == 0)
- return (NULL);
-
- assert (list_len < list_size);
- assert (list[list_len] == 0);
-
- return (list);
+ return (count?count:1);
} /* int *ps_read_tasks */
int ps_read_process (int pid, procstat_t *ps, char *state)
char *fields[64];
char fields_len;
- int *tasks;
int i;
int ppid;
ps->num_lwp = 0;
ps->num_proc = 0;
}
- else if ((tasks = ps_read_tasks (pid)) == NULL)
- {
- /* Kernel 2.4 or so */
- ps->num_lwp = 1;
- ps->num_proc = 1;
- }
else
{
- ps->num_lwp = 0;
+ if ( (ps->num_lwp = ps_read_tasks (pid)) == -1 )
+ return (-1);
ps->num_proc = 1;
- for (i = 0; tasks[i] != 0; i++)
- ps->num_lwp++;
-
- free (tasks);
- tasks = NULL;
}
/* Leave the rest at zero if this is only a zombi */