summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 36f8d17)
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 36f8d17)
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org> | |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:40:58 +0000 (11:40 -0700) | ||
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org> | |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:40:58 +0000 (11:40 -0700) |
It makes gitk unhappy, and besides, non-merge-order doesn't complain, so
why do it here..
why do it here..
epoch.c | patch | blob | history |
index cbbc418c146c9fe4d6723b6548ff7bef0fb2cc6c..904cc0d4b89db2307d137a474ab8f555ab67ea12 100644 (file)
--- a/epoch.c
+++ b/epoch.c
struct commit *next = list->item;
if (!(next->object.flags & UNINTERESTING)) {
- if (next->object.flags & DUPCHECK) {
- fprintf(stderr, "%s: duplicate commit %s ignored\n",
- __FUNCTION__, sha1_to_hex(next->object.sha1));
- } else {
+ if (!(next->object.flags & DUPCHECK)) {
next->object.flags |= DUPCHECK;
commit_list_insert(list->item, &reversed);
}