summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 56bfd76)
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 56bfd76)
author | Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> | |
Wed, 8 Sep 2010 06:40:41 +0000 (00:40 -0600) | ||
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | |
Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:03:02 +0000 (17:03 -0700) |
In merge-recursive.c, whenever there was a rename where a file name on one
side of the rename matches a directory name on the other side of the merge,
then the very first check that
string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, ren1_dst)
would trigger forcing it into marking it as a rename/directory conflict.
However, if the path is only renamed on one side and a simple three-way
merge between the separate files resolves cleanly, then we don't need to
mark it as a rename/directory conflict. So, we can simply move the check
for rename/directory conflicts after we've verified that there isn't a
rename/rename conflict and that a threeway content merge doesn't work.
This changes the particular error message one gets in the case where the
directory name that a file on one side of the rename matches is not also
part of the rename pair. For example, with commits containing the files:
COMMON -> (HEAD, MERGE )
--------- --------------- -------
sub/file1 -> (sub/file1, newsub)
<NULL> -> (newsub/newfile, <NULL>)
then previously when one tried to merge MERGE into HEAD, one would get
CONFLICT (rename/directory): Rename sub/file1->newsub in HEAD directory newsub added in merge
Renaming sub/file1 to newsub~HEAD instead
Adding newsub/newfile
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
After this patch, the error message will instead become:
Removing newsub
Adding newsub/newfile
CONFLICT (file/directory): There is a directory with name newsub in merge. Adding newsub as newsub~HEAD
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
That makes more sense to me, because git can't know that there's a conflict
until after it's tried resolving paths involving newsub/newfile to see if
they are still in the way at the end (and if newsub/newfile is not in the
way at the end, there should be no conflict at all, which did not hold with
git previously).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
side of the rename matches a directory name on the other side of the merge,
then the very first check that
string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, ren1_dst)
would trigger forcing it into marking it as a rename/directory conflict.
However, if the path is only renamed on one side and a simple three-way
merge between the separate files resolves cleanly, then we don't need to
mark it as a rename/directory conflict. So, we can simply move the check
for rename/directory conflicts after we've verified that there isn't a
rename/rename conflict and that a threeway content merge doesn't work.
This changes the particular error message one gets in the case where the
directory name that a file on one side of the rename matches is not also
part of the rename pair. For example, with commits containing the files:
COMMON -> (HEAD, MERGE )
--------- --------------- -------
sub/file1 -> (sub/file1, newsub)
<NULL> -> (newsub/newfile, <NULL>)
then previously when one tried to merge MERGE into HEAD, one would get
CONFLICT (rename/directory): Rename sub/file1->newsub in HEAD directory newsub added in merge
Renaming sub/file1 to newsub~HEAD instead
Adding newsub/newfile
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
After this patch, the error message will instead become:
Removing newsub
Adding newsub/newfile
CONFLICT (file/directory): There is a directory with name newsub in merge. Adding newsub as newsub~HEAD
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
That makes more sense to me, because git can't know that there's a conflict
until after it's tried resolving paths involving newsub/newfile to see if
they are still in the way at the end (and if newsub/newfile is not in the
way at the end, there should be no conflict at all, which did not hold with
git previously).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive.c | patch | blob | history | |
t/t3509-cherry-pick-merge-df.sh | patch | blob | history |
diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index 20e1779428ee553a940592c09bbabe9ca9800a39..5ea6d115071f6c60ba17b9f867dd1dac52527355 100644 (file)
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
try_merge = 0;
- if (string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, ren1_dst)) {
- clean_merge = 0;
- output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (rename/directory): Rename %s->%s in %s "
- " directory %s added in %s",
- ren1_src, ren1_dst, branch1,
- ren1_dst, branch2);
- conflict_rename_dir(o, ren1, branch1);
- } else if (sha_eq(src_other.sha1, null_sha1)) {
+ if (sha_eq(src_other.sha1, null_sha1)) {
clean_merge = 0;
output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (rename/delete): Rename %s->%s in %s "
"and deleted in %s",
if (!ren1->dst_entry->stages[2].mode !=
!ren1->dst_entry->stages[3].mode)
ren1->dst_entry->processed = 0;
+ } else if (string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, ren1_dst)) {
+ clean_merge = 0;
+ output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (rename/directory): Rename %s->%s in %s "
+ " directory %s added in %s",
+ ren1_src, ren1_dst, branch1,
+ ren1_dst, branch2);
+ conflict_rename_dir(o, ren1, branch1);
} else {
if (mfi.merge || !mfi.clean)
output(o, 1, "Renaming %s => %s", ren1_src, ren1_dst);
index eb5826f30ecd8ccd7fc7514a677ed74b71a100a3..948ca1bce66cab317bf74984b22384f2625418c1 100755 (executable)
git cherry-pick --strategy=resolve simple
'
-test_expect_failure 'Cherry-pick succeeds with was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir (recursive)' '
+test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick succeeds with was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir (recursive)' '
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -q nick-testcase^0 &&
git cherry-pick --strategy=recursive simple
git cherry-pick --strategy=resolve mergeme
'
-test_expect_failure 'Cherry-pick with rename to different D/F conflict succeeds (recursive)' '
+test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick with rename to different D/F conflict succeeds (recursive)' '
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -q newhead^0 &&
git cherry-pick --strategy=recursive mergeme