summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 49aaddd)
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 49aaddd)
author | Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> | |
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 02:35:25 +0000 (21:35 -0500) | ||
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | |
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 08:05:45 +0000 (00:05 -0800) |
If autofollowing of tags is enabled, we see a new tag on the remote
that we don't have, and we already have the SHA-1 object that the
tag is peeled to, then we can fetch the tag while we are fetching
the other objects on the first connection.
This is a slight optimization for projects that have a habit of
tagging a release commit after most users have already seen and
downloaded that commit object through a prior fetch session. In
such cases the users may still find new objects in branch heads,
but the new tag will now also be part of the first pack transfer
and the subsequent connection to autofollow tags is not required.
Currently git.git does not benefit from this optimization as any
release usually gets a new commit at the same time that it gets a
new release tag, however git-gui.git and many other projects are
in the habit of tagging fairly old commits.
Users who did not already have the tagged commit still require
opening a second connection to autofollow the tag, as we are unable
to determine on the client side if $tag^{} will be sent to the
client during the first transfer or not. Such computation must be
performed on the remote side of the connection and is deferred to
another series of changes.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
that we don't have, and we already have the SHA-1 object that the
tag is peeled to, then we can fetch the tag while we are fetching
the other objects on the first connection.
This is a slight optimization for projects that have a habit of
tagging a release commit after most users have already seen and
downloaded that commit object through a prior fetch session. In
such cases the users may still find new objects in branch heads,
but the new tag will now also be part of the first pack transfer
and the subsequent connection to autofollow tags is not required.
Currently git.git does not benefit from this optimization as any
release usually gets a new commit at the same time that it gets a
new release tag, however git-gui.git and many other projects are
in the habit of tagging fairly old commits.
Users who did not already have the tagged commit still require
opening a second connection to autofollow the tag, as we are unable
to determine on the client side if $tag^{} will be sent to the
client during the first transfer or not. Such computation must be
performed on the remote side of the connection and is deferred to
another series of changes.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin-fetch.c | patch | blob | history |
diff --git a/builtin-fetch.c b/builtin-fetch.c
index 3758d4817e2f418d971715426e8d6a956bfae5a9..a58efa6ece78a66cf807a80b96198d08e2e2ea0b 100644 (file)
--- a/builtin-fetch.c
+++ b/builtin-fetch.c
}
}
+static void find_non_local_tags(struct transport *transport,
+ struct ref **head,
+ struct ref ***tail);
+
static struct ref *get_ref_map(struct transport *transport,
struct refspec *refs, int ref_count, int tags,
int *autotags)
tail = &ref_map->next;
}
}
+ if (tags == TAGS_DEFAULT && *autotags)
+ find_non_local_tags(transport, &ref_map, &tail);
ref_remove_duplicates(ref_map);
return ref_map;