summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 04c6e9e)
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 04c6e9e)
author | Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> | |
Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:45:57 +0000 (10:45 +0200) | ||
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | |
Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:27:07 +0000 (17:27 -0700) |
This extends the --subdirectory-filter test in t7003 to demonstrate a
rewriting bug: when rewriting two refs A and B such that B is an
ancestor of A, it fails to rewrite B.
The underlying issue is that the rev-list invocation at
git-filter-branch.sh:332 more or less boils down to
git rev-list B --boundary ^A
which outputs nothing because B is an ancestor of A.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rewriting bug: when rewriting two refs A and B such that B is an
ancestor of A, it fails to rewrite B.
The underlying issue is that the rev-list invocation at
git-filter-branch.sh:332 more or less boils down to
git rev-list B --boundary ^A
which outputs nothing because B is an ancestor of A.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t/t7003-filter-branch.sh | patch | blob | history |
index a0ab096c8fdee153a89a1428f85c9bf107badada..4382baa27dae7c9ba9d51551dbfbb6efb74e91bd 100755 (executable)
--- a/t/t7003-filter-branch.sh
+++ b/t/t7003-filter-branch.sh
test_tick &&
git commit -m "again not subdir" &&
git branch sub &&
- git-filter-branch -f --subdirectory-filter subdir refs/heads/sub
+ git branch sub-earlier HEAD~2 &&
+ git-filter-branch -f --subdirectory-filter subdir \
+ refs/heads/sub refs/heads/sub-earlier
'
-test_expect_success 'subdirectory filter result looks okay' '
+test_expect_failure 'subdirectory filter result looks okay' '
test 2 = $(git rev-list sub | wc -l) &&
git show sub:new &&
- test_must_fail git show sub:subdir
+ test_must_fail git show sub:subdir &&
+ git show sub-earlier:new &&
+ test_must_fail git show sub-earlier:subdir
'
test_expect_success 'more setup' '