summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 6b0f3f4)
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 6b0f3f4)
author | Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> | |
Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:54:56 +0000 (18:54 -0500) | ||
committer | Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> | |
Sun, 21 Jan 2007 07:54:16 +0000 (02:54 -0500) |
We no longer describe updating the index as including changes, as we
now use the add notation used by core Git's command line tools. So
its confusing to be talking about unincluded changes within the revert
dialog. Instead we should used language like 'unadded changes'.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
now use the add notation used by core Git's command line tools. So
its confusing to be talking about unincluded changes within the revert
dialog. Instead we should used language like 'unadded changes'.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-gui | patch | blob | history |
index 04fdb0c1e75c2173b6744860d0f87f579271a6dc..ade64dcd1243123104164c42f2bd26555993c2b4 100755 (executable)
--- a/git-gui
+++ b/git-gui
set reply [tk_dialog \
.confirm_revert \
"$appname ($reponame)" \
- "Revert unincluded changes in $s?
+ "Revert changes in $s?
-Any unincluded changes will be permanently lost by the revert." \
+Any unadded changes will be permanently lost by the revert." \
question \
1 \
{Do Nothing} \