summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: e3ff4b2)
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: e3ff4b2)
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> | |
Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:26:41 +0000 (22:26 -0800) | ||
committer | Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> | |
Mon, 22 Jan 2007 07:35:47 +0000 (23:35 -0800) |
This separates the connectivity check into separate codepaths,
one for reachable objects and the other for unreachable ones,
while adding a lot of comments to explain what is going on.
When checking an unreachable object, unlike a reachable one, we
do not have to complain if it does not exist (we used to
complain about a missing blob even when the only thing that
references it is a tree that is dangling). Also we do not have
to check and complain about objects that are referenced by an
unreachable object.
This makes the messages from fsck-objects a lot less noisy and
more useful.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
one for reachable objects and the other for unreachable ones,
while adding a lot of comments to explain what is going on.
When checking an unreachable object, unlike a reachable one, we
do not have to complain if it does not exist (we used to
complain about a missing blob even when the only thing that
references it is a tree that is dangling). Also we do not have
to check and complain about objects that are referenced by an
unreachable object.
This makes the messages from fsck-objects a lot less noisy and
more useful.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
fsck-objects.c | patch | blob | history |
diff --git a/fsck-objects.c b/fsck-objects.c
index 81f00db90b2f31d5362654a3e6a86f9cb93cf474..ecfb014fffe1c13dedcd6973b4328abeef02413d 100644 (file)
--- a/fsck-objects.c
+++ b/fsck-objects.c
return -1;
}
+/*
+ * Check a single reachable object
+ */
+static void check_reachable_object(struct object *obj)
+{
+ const struct object_refs *refs;
+
+ /*
+ * We obviously want the object to be parsed,
+ * except if it was in a pack-file and we didn't
+ * do a full fsck
+ */
+ if (!obj->parsed) {
+ if (has_sha1_file(obj->sha1))
+ return; /* it is in pack - forget about it */
+ printf("missing %s %s\n", typename(obj->type), sha1_to_hex(obj->sha1));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Check that everything that we try to reference is also good.
+ */
+ refs = lookup_object_refs(obj);
+ if (refs) {
+ unsigned j;
+ for (j = 0; j < refs->count; j++) {
+ struct object *ref = refs->ref[j];
+ if (ref->parsed ||
+ (has_sha1_file(ref->sha1)))
+ continue;
+ printf("broken link from %7s %s\n",
+ typename(obj->type), sha1_to_hex(obj->sha1));
+ printf(" to %7s %s\n",
+ typename(ref->type), sha1_to_hex(ref->sha1));
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check a single unreachable object
+ */
+static void check_unreachable_object(struct object *obj)
+{
+ /*
+ * Missing unreachable object? Ignore it. It's not like
+ * we miss it (since it can't be reached), nor do we want
+ * to complain about it being unreachable (since it does
+ * not exist).
+ */
+ if (!obj->parsed)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Unreachable object that exists? Show it if asked to,
+ * since this is something that is prunable.
+ */
+ if (show_unreachable) {
+ printf("unreachable %s %s\n", typename(obj->type), sha1_to_hex(obj->sha1));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * "!used" means that nothing at all points to it, including
+ * other unreacahble objects. In other words, it's the "tip"
+ * of some set of unreachable objects, usually a commit that
+ * got dropped.
+ *
+ * Such starting points are more interesting than some random
+ * set of unreachable objects, so we show them even if the user
+ * hasn't asked for _all_ unreachable objects. If you have
+ * deleted a branch by mistake, this is a prime candidate to
+ * start looking at, for example.
+ */
+ if (!obj->used) {
+ printf("dangling %s %s\n", typename(obj->type),
+ sha1_to_hex(obj->sha1));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Otherwise? It's there, it's unreachable, and some other unreachable
+ * object points to it. Ignore it - it's not interesting, and we showed
+ * all the interesting cases above.
+ */
+}
+
+static void check_object(struct object *obj)
+{
+ if (obj->flags & REACHABLE)
+ check_reachable_object(obj);
+ else
+ check_unreachable_object(obj);
+}
static void check_connectivity(void)
{
/* Look up all the requirements, warn about missing objects.. */
max = get_max_object_index();
for (i = 0; i < max; i++) {
- const struct object_refs *refs;
struct object *obj = get_indexed_object(i);
- if (!obj)
- continue;
-
- if (!obj->parsed) {
- if (has_sha1_file(obj->sha1))
- ; /* it is in pack */
- else
- printf("missing %s %s\n",
- typename(obj->type), sha1_to_hex(obj->sha1));
- continue;
- }
-
- refs = lookup_object_refs(obj);
- if (refs) {
- unsigned j;
- for (j = 0; j < refs->count; j++) {
- struct object *ref = refs->ref[j];
- if (ref->parsed ||
- (has_sha1_file(ref->sha1)))
- continue;
- printf("broken link from %7s %s\n",
- typename(obj->type), sha1_to_hex(obj->sha1));
- printf(" to %7s %s\n",
- typename(ref->type), sha1_to_hex(ref->sha1));
- }
- }
-
- if (show_unreachable && !(obj->flags & REACHABLE)) {
- printf("unreachable %s %s\n",
- typename(obj->type), sha1_to_hex(obj->sha1));
- continue;
- }
-
- if (!obj->used) {
- printf("dangling %s %s\n", typename(obj->type),
- sha1_to_hex(obj->sha1));
- }
+ if (obj)
+ check_object(obj);
}
}