summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: e51fd86)
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: e51fd86)
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> | |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:01:01 +0000 (00:01 -0700) | ||
committer | Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> | |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:01:01 +0000 (00:01 -0700) |
I took a look at webgit, and it looks like at least for the "projects"
page, the most common operation ends up being basically
git-rev-list --header --parents --max-count=1 HEAD
Now, the thing is, the way "git-rev-list" works, it always keeps on
popping the parents and parsing them in order to build the list of
parents, and it turns out that even though we just want a single commit,
git-rev-list will invariably look up _three_ generations of commits.
It will parse:
- the commit we want (it obviously needs this)
- it's parent(s) as part of the "pop_most_recent_commit()" logic
- it will then pop one of the parents before it notices that it doesn't
need any more
- and as part of popping the parent, it will parse the grandparent (again
due to "pop_most_recent_commit()".
Now, I've strace'd it, and it really is pretty efficient on the whole, but
if things aren't nicely cached, and with long-latency IO, doing those two
extra objects (at a minimum - if the parent is a merge it will be more) is
just wasted time, and potentially a lot of it.
So here's a quick special-case for the trivial case of "just one commit,
and no date-limits or other special rules".
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
page, the most common operation ends up being basically
git-rev-list --header --parents --max-count=1 HEAD
Now, the thing is, the way "git-rev-list" works, it always keeps on
popping the parents and parsing them in order to build the list of
parents, and it turns out that even though we just want a single commit,
git-rev-list will invariably look up _three_ generations of commits.
It will parse:
- the commit we want (it obviously needs this)
- it's parent(s) as part of the "pop_most_recent_commit()" logic
- it will then pop one of the parents before it notices that it doesn't
need any more
- and as part of popping the parent, it will parse the grandparent (again
due to "pop_most_recent_commit()".
Now, I've strace'd it, and it really is pretty efficient on the whole, but
if things aren't nicely cached, and with long-latency IO, doing those two
extra objects (at a minimum - if the parent is a merge it will be more) is
just wasted time, and potentially a lot of it.
So here's a quick special-case for the trivial case of "just one commit,
and no date-limits or other special rules".
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
rev-list.c | patch | blob | history |
diff --git a/rev-list.c b/rev-list.c
index c60aa72957cb65501266911aefd8aaaa2f2e4e16..3a32e405a38faebe0d4b7ec3b743fe3e15cfd3cf 100644 (file)
--- a/rev-list.c
+++ b/rev-list.c
if (!merge_order) {
sort_by_date(&list);
+ if (list && !limited && max_count == 1 &&
+ !tag_objects && !tree_objects && !blob_objects) {
+ show_commit(list->item);
+ return 0;
+ }
if (limited)
list = limit_list(list);
if (topo_order)