hash_object: correction for zero length file

The check whether size is zero was done after if size <= SMALL_FILE_SIZE,
as result, zero size case was never triggered. Instead zero length file
was treated as any other small file. This did not caused any problem, but
if we have a special case for size equal to zero, it is better to make it
work and avoid redundant malloc().

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c
index ff65328006404fd0d113f2cd4c4d52377b4cc8cf..1b551e4609dfde6f047de54c4ee7ed4b006c0ce5 100644 (file)
--- a/sha1_file.c
+++ b/sha1_file.c
@@ -2448,6 +2448,8 @@ int index_fd(unsigned char *sha1, int fd, struct stat *st, int write_object,
                else
                        ret = -1;
                strbuf_release(&sbuf);
+       } else if (!size) {
+               ret = index_mem(sha1, NULL, size, write_object, type, path);
        } else if (size <= SMALL_FILE_SIZE) {
                char *buf = xmalloc(size);
                if (size == read_in_full(fd, buf, size))
@@ -2456,12 +2458,11 @@ int index_fd(unsigned char *sha1, int fd, struct stat *st, int write_object,
                else
                        ret = error("short read %s", strerror(errno));
                free(buf);
-       } else if (size) {
+       } else {
                void *buf = xmmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0);
                ret = index_mem(sha1, buf, size, write_object, type, path);
                munmap(buf, size);
-       } else
-               ret = index_mem(sha1, NULL, size, write_object, type, path);
+       }
        close(fd);
        return ret;
 }