author | Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> | |
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:46:19 +0000 (16:46 -0400) | ||
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | |
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:16:23 +0000 (15:16 -0700) | ||
commit | ce3f6dc655392803a59c9b2f2ec9509fd8061b33 | |
tree | 8e8bf1cb006a666da52991b2db3e0f3e49c9a5a0 | tree | snapshot |
parent | 6a87ed972c9c7a4b4378b6e34670d3aa2ac7ccc8 | commit | diff |
fix multiple issues in index-pack
Since commit 9441b61dc5, two issues affected correct behavior of
index-pack:
1) The real_type of a delta object is the 'real_type' of its base, not
the 'type' which can be a "delta type". Consequence of this is a
corrupted pack index file which only needs to be recreated with a
good index-pack command ('git verify-pack' will flag those).
2) The code sequence:
result->data = patch_delta(get_base_data(base), base->obj->size,
delta_data, delta_size, &result->size);
has two issues of its own since base->obj->size should instead be
base->size as we want the size of the actual object data and not
the size of the delta object it is represented by. Except that
simply replacing base->obj->size with base->size won't make the
code more correct as the C language doesn't enforce a particular
ordering for the evaluation of needed arguments for a function call,
hence base->size could be pushed on the stack before get_base_data()
which initializes base->size is called.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Tested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since commit 9441b61dc5, two issues affected correct behavior of
index-pack:
1) The real_type of a delta object is the 'real_type' of its base, not
the 'type' which can be a "delta type". Consequence of this is a
corrupted pack index file which only needs to be recreated with a
good index-pack command ('git verify-pack' will flag those).
2) The code sequence:
result->data = patch_delta(get_base_data(base), base->obj->size,
delta_data, delta_size, &result->size);
has two issues of its own since base->obj->size should instead be
base->size as we want the size of the actual object data and not
the size of the delta object it is represented by. Except that
simply replacing base->obj->size with base->size won't make the
code more correct as the C language doesn't enforce a particular
ordering for the evaluation of needed arguments for a function call,
hence base->size could be pushed on the stack before get_base_data()
which initializes base->size is called.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Tested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
index-pack.c | diff | blob | history |