![[tokkee]](http://tokkee.org/images/avatar.png){kind=avatar}
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> | |
| Sun, 14 May 2006 17:43:50 +0000 (10:43 -0700) | ||
| committer | Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> | |
| Sun, 14 May 2006 23:48:23 +0000 (16:48 -0700) | ||
| commit | 76b99b81613abea4cc16e45e1b11dbbec82a4b4d | |
| tree | 71e223857537c34fc72f8ddeb26470f0ae2640d3 | tree | snapshot |
| parent | 975bf9cf5ad5d440f98f464ae8124609a4835ce1 | commit | diff |
Allow one-way tree merge to remove old files
For some random reason (probably just because nobody noticed), the one-way
merge strategy didn't mark deleted files as deleted, so if you used
git-read-tree -m -u <newtree>
it would update the files that got changed in the index, but it would not
delete the files that got deleted.
This should fix it, and I can't imagine that anybody depends on the old
strange "update only existing files" behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
For some random reason (probably just because nobody noticed), the one-way
merge strategy didn't mark deleted files as deleted, so if you used
git-read-tree -m -u <newtree>
it would update the files that got changed in the index, but it would not
delete the files that got deleted.
This should fix it, and I can't imagine that anybody depends on the old
strange "update only existing files" behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
| read-tree.c | diff | blob | history |