X-Git-Url: https://git.tokkee.org/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=Documentation%2Fgit-bisect.txt;h=b2bc58d8513b0c064333d8b0aa357ebcea3ba28f;hb=957d6ea78fcbe71481a6f46a58768e100f7908e0;hp=ac4b4965a93fd5087896e8e807f6ad28db566df7;hpb=03f99c03f806ca13b5974450409426c04af220f2;p=git.git diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt index ac4b4965a..b2bc58d85 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ git-bisect(1) NAME ---- -git-bisect - Find the change that introduced a bug +git-bisect - Find the change that introduced a bug by binary search SYNOPSIS @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ SYNOPSIS DESCRIPTION ----------- -The command takes various subcommands, and different options -depending on the subcommand: +The command takes various subcommands, and different options depending +on the subcommand: git bisect start [...] git bisect bad @@ -22,30 +22,34 @@ depending on the subcommand: git bisect visualize git bisect replay git bisect log + git bisect run ... -This command uses 'git-rev-list --bisect' option to help drive -the binary search process to find which change introduced a bug, -given an old "good" commit object name and a later "bad" commit -object name. +This command uses 'git-rev-list --bisect' option to help drive the +binary search process to find which change introduced a bug, given an +old "good" commit object name and a later "bad" commit object name. + +Basic bisect commands: start, bad, good +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The way you use it is: ------------------------------------------------ $ git bisect start -$ git bisect bad # Current version is bad -$ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2 # v2.6.13-rc2 was the last version - # tested that was good +$ git bisect bad # Current version is bad +$ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2 # v2.6.13-rc2 was the last version + # tested that was good ------------------------------------------------ -When you give at least one bad and one good versions, it will -bisect the revision tree and say something like: +When you give at least one bad and one good versions, it will bisect +the revision tree and say something like: ------------------------------------------------ Bisecting: 675 revisions left to test after this ------------------------------------------------ -and check out the state in the middle. Now, compile that kernel, and boot -it. Now, let's say that this booted kernel works fine, then just do +and check out the state in the middle. Now, compile that kernel, and +boot it. Now, let's say that this booted kernel works fine, then just +do ------------------------------------------------ $ git bisect good # this one is good @@ -57,12 +61,15 @@ which will now say Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this ------------------------------------------------ -and you continue along, compiling that one, testing it, and depending on -whether it is good or bad, you say "git bisect good" or "git bisect bad", -and ask for the next bisection. +and you continue along, compiling that one, testing it, and depending +on whether it is good or bad, you say "git bisect good" or "git bisect +bad", and ask for the next bisection. + +Until you have no more left, and you'll have been left with the first +bad kernel rev in "refs/bisect/bad". -Until you have no more left, and you'll have been left with the first bad -kernel rev in "refs/bisect/bad". +Bisect reset +~~~~~~~~~~~~ Oh, and then after you want to reset to the original head, do a @@ -70,10 +77,13 @@ Oh, and then after you want to reset to the original head, do a $ git bisect reset ------------------------------------------------ -to get back to the master branch, instead of being in one of the bisection -branches ("git bisect start" will do that for you too, actually: it will -reset the bisection state, and before it does that it checks that you're -not using some old bisection branch). +to get back to the master branch, instead of being in one of the +bisection branches ("git bisect start" will do that for you too, +actually: it will reset the bisection state, and before it does that +it checks that you're not using some old bisection branch). + +Bisect visualize +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ During the bisection process, you can say @@ -83,9 +93,17 @@ $ git bisect visualize to see the currently remaining suspects in `gitk`. -The good/bad input is logged, and `git bisect -log` shows what you have done so far. You can truncate its -output somewhere and save it in a file, and run +Bisect log and bisect replay +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +The good/bad input is logged, and + +------------ +$ git bisect log +------------ + +shows what you have done so far. You can truncate its output somewhere +and save it in a file, and run ------------ $ git bisect replay that-file @@ -94,12 +112,16 @@ $ git bisect replay that-file if you find later you made a mistake telling good/bad about a revision. -If in a middle of bisect session, you know what the bisect -suggested to try next is not a good one to test (e.g. the change -the commit introduces is known not to work in your environment -and you know it does not have anything to do with the bug you -are chasing), you may want to find a near-by commit and try that -instead. It goes something like this: +Avoiding to test a commit +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +If in a middle of bisect session, you know what the bisect suggested +to try next is not a good one to test (e.g. the change the commit +introduces is known not to work in your environment and you know it +does not have anything to do with the bug you are chasing), you may +want to find a near-by commit and try that instead. + +It goes something like this: ------------ $ git bisect good/bad # previous round was good/bad. @@ -109,18 +131,52 @@ $ git reset --hard HEAD~3 # try 3 revs before what # was suggested ------------ -Then compile and test the one you chose to try. After that, -tell bisect what the result was as usual. +Then compile and test the one you chose to try. After that, tell +bisect what the result was as usual. -You can further cut down the number of trials if you know what -part of the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking -down, by giving paths parameters when you say `bisect start`, -like this: +Cutting down bisection by giving path parameter to bisect start +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +You can further cut down the number of trials if you know what part of +the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking down, by giving +paths parameters when you say `bisect start`, like this: ------------ $ git bisect start arch/i386 include/asm-i386 ------------ +Bisect run +~~~~~~~~~~ + +If you have a script that can tell if the current source code is good +or bad, you can automatically bisect using: + +------------ +$ git bisect run my_script +------------ + +Note that the "run" script (`my_script` in the above example) should +exit with code 0 in case the current source code is good and with a +code between 1 and 127 (included) in case the current source code is +bad. + +Any other exit code will abort the automatic bisect process. (A +program that does "exit(-1)" leaves $? = 255, see exit(3) manual page, +the value is chopped with "& 0377".) + +You may often find that during bisect you want to have near-constant +tweaks (e.g., s/#define DEBUG 0/#define DEBUG 1/ in a header file, or +"revision that does not have this commit needs this patch applied to +work around other problem this bisection is not interested in") +applied to the revision being tested. + +To cope with such a situation, after the inner git-bisect finds the +next revision to test, with the "run" script, you can apply that tweak +before compiling, run the real test, and after the test decides if the +revision (possibly with the needed tweaks) passed the test, rewind the +tree to the pristine state. Finally the "run" script can exit with +the status of the real test to let "git bisect run" command loop to +know the outcome. Author ------