![[tokkee]](http://tokkee.org/images/avatar.png){kind=avatar}
index 73008705ebe304c8d2a2d089e9328be369c50fc6..fed5097e00b4a031c2992ac3d421f6df975e6152 100644 (file)
SYNOPSIS
--------
+[verse]
'git cherry-pick' [--edit] [-n] [-m parent-number] [-s] [-x] [--ff] <commit>...
+'git cherry-pick' --continue
+'git cherry-pick' --quit
+'git cherry-pick' --abort
DESCRIPTION
-----------
introduces, recording a new commit for each. This requires your
working tree to be clean (no modifications from the HEAD commit).
+When it is not obvious how to apply a change, the following
+happens:
+
+1. The current branch and `HEAD` pointer stay at the last commit
+ successfully made.
+2. The `CHERRY_PICK_HEAD` ref is set to point at the commit that
+ introduced the change that is difficult to apply.
+3. Paths in which the change applied cleanly are updated both
+ in the index file and in your working tree.
+4. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
+ versions, as described in the "TRUE MERGE" section of
+ linkgit:git-merge[1]. The working tree files will include
+ a description of the conflict bracketed by the usual
+ conflict markers `<<<<<<<` and `>>>>>>>`.
+5. No other modifications are made.
+
+See linkgit:git-merge[1] for some hints on resolving such
+conflicts.
+
OPTIONS
-------
<commit>...::
message prior to committing.
-x::
- When recording the commit, append to the original commit
- message a note that indicates which commit this change
- was cherry-picked from. Append the note only for cherry
+ When recording the commit, append a line that says
+ "(cherry picked from commit ...)" to the original commit
+ message in order to indicate which commit this change was
+ cherry-picked from. This is done only for cherry
picks without conflicts. Do not use this option if
you are cherry-picking from your private branch because
the information is useless to the recipient. If on the
cherry-pick'ed commit, then a fast forward to this commit will
be performed.
+--strategy=<strategy>::
+ Use the given merge strategy. Should only be used once.
+ See the MERGE STRATEGIES section in linkgit:git-merge[1]
+ for details.
+
+-X<option>::
+--strategy-option=<option>::
+ Pass the merge strategy-specific option through to the
+ merge strategy. See linkgit:git-merge[1] for details.
+
+SEQUENCER SUBCOMMANDS
+---------------------
+include::sequencer.txt[]
+
EXAMPLES
--------
-git cherry-pick master::
+`git cherry-pick master`::
Apply the change introduced by the commit at the tip of the
master branch and create a new commit with this change.
-git cherry-pick ..master::
-git cherry-pick ^HEAD master::
+`git cherry-pick ..master`::
+`git cherry-pick ^HEAD master`::
Apply the changes introduced by all commits that are ancestors
of master but not of HEAD to produce new commits.
-git cherry-pick master{tilde}4 master{tilde}2::
+`git cherry-pick master{tilde}4 master{tilde}2`::
Apply the changes introduced by the fifth and third last
commits pointed to by master and create 2 new commits with
these changes.
-git cherry-pick -n master~1 next::
+`git cherry-pick -n master~1 next`::
Apply to the working tree and the index the changes introduced
by the second last commit pointed to by master and by the last
commit pointed to by next, but do not create any commit with
these changes.
-git cherry-pick --ff ..next::
+`git cherry-pick --ff ..next`::
If history is linear and HEAD is an ancestor of next, update
the working tree and advance the HEAD pointer to match next.
are in next but not HEAD to the current branch, creating a new
commit for each new change.
-git rev-list --reverse master \-- README | git cherry-pick -n --stdin::
+`git rev-list --reverse master \-- README | git cherry-pick -n --stdin`::
Apply the changes introduced by all commits on the master
branch that touched README to the working tree and index,
so the result can be inspected and made into a single new
commit if suitable.
-Author
-------
-Written by Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-
-Documentation
---------------
-Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
+The following sequence attempts to backport a patch, bails out because
+the code the patch applies to has changed too much, and then tries
+again, this time exercising more care about matching up context lines.
+
+------------
+$ git cherry-pick topic^ <1>
+$ git diff <2>
+$ git reset --merge ORIG_HEAD <3>
+$ git cherry-pick -Xpatience topic^ <4>
+------------
+<1> apply the change that would be shown by `git show topic^`.
+In this example, the patch does not apply cleanly, so
+information about the conflict is written to the index and
+working tree and no new commit results.
+<2> summarize changes to be reconciled
+<3> cancel the cherry-pick. In other words, return to the
+pre-cherry-pick state, preserving any local modifications you had in
+the working tree.
+<4> try to apply the change introduced by `topic^` again,
+spending extra time to avoid mistakes based on incorrectly matching
+context lines.
SEE ALSO
--------