Merge branch 'jk/maint-commit-v-strip'

[git.git] / Documentation / git-bisect.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
index c794914366c5c09a08d169612721b836ccb0946b..39034ec7d6dff42f4be282c4216a7e13ff255d91 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ on the subcommand:
  git bisect log
  git bisect run <cmd>...
 
-This command uses 'git-rev-list --bisect' to help drive the
+This command uses 'git rev-list --bisect' to help drive the
 binary search process to find which change introduced a bug, given an
 old "good" commit object name and a later "bad" commit object name.
 
@@ -98,10 +98,10 @@ During the bisection process, you can say
 $ git bisect visualize
 ------------
 
-to see the currently remaining suspects in `gitk`.  `visualize` is a bit
+to see the currently remaining suspects in 'gitk'.  `visualize` is a bit
 too long to type and `view` is provided as a synonym.
 
-If 'DISPLAY' environment variable is not set, 'git-log' is used
+If 'DISPLAY' environment variable is not set, 'git log' is used
 instead.  You can even give command line options such as `-p` and
 `--stat`.
 
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ tweaks (e.g., s/#define DEBUG 0/#define DEBUG 1/ in a header file, or
 work around other problem this bisection is not interested in")
 applied to the revision being tested.
 
-To cope with such a situation, after the inner 'git-bisect' finds the
+To cope with such a situation, after the inner 'git bisect' finds the
 next revision to test, with the "run" script, you can apply that tweak
 before compiling, run the real test, and after the test decides if the
 revision (possibly with the needed tweaks) passed the test, rewind the