"init-db" can really be just "init"

[git.git] / Documentation / tutorial.txt

A tutorial introduction to git
==============================

This tutorial explains how to import a new project into git, make
changes to it, and share changes with other developers.

First, note that you can get documentation for a command such as "git
diff" with:

------------------------------------------------
$ man git-diff
------------------------------------------------

It is a good idea to introduce yourself to git before doing any
operation.  The easiest way to do so is:

------------------------------------------------
$ cat >~/.gitconfig <<\EOF
[user]
        name = Your Name Comes Here
        email = you@yourdomain.example.com
EOF
------------------------------------------------


Importing a new project
-----------------------

Assume you have a tarball project.tar.gz with your initial work.  You
can place it under git revision control as follows.

------------------------------------------------
$ tar xzf project.tar.gz
$ cd project
$ git init
------------------------------------------------

Git will reply

------------------------------------------------
Initialized empty Git repository in .git/
------------------------------------------------

You've now initialized the working directory--you may notice a new
directory created, named ".git".  Tell git that you want it to track
every file under the current directory (note the '.') with:

------------------------------------------------
$ git add .
------------------------------------------------

Finally,

------------------------------------------------
$ git commit
------------------------------------------------

will prompt you for a commit message, then record the current state
of all the files to the repository.

Making changes
--------------

Try modifying some files, then run

------------------------------------------------
$ git diff
------------------------------------------------

to review your changes.  When you're done, tell git that you
want the updated contents of these files in the commit and then
make a commit, like this:

------------------------------------------------
$ git add file1 file2 file3
$ git commit
------------------------------------------------

This will again prompt your for a message describing the change, and then
record the new versions of the files you listed.

Alternatively, instead of running `git add` beforehand, you can use

------------------------------------------------
$ git commit -a
------------------------------------------------

which will automatically notice modified (but not new) files.

A note on commit messages: Though not required, it's a good idea to
begin the commit message with a single short (less than 50 character)
line summarizing the change, followed by a blank line and then a more
thorough description.  Tools that turn commits into email, for
example, use the first line on the Subject: line and the rest of the
commit in the body.


Git tracks content not files
----------------------------

With git you have to explicitly "add" all the changed _content_ you
want to commit together. This can be done in a few different ways:

1) By using 'git add <file_spec>...'

   This can be performed multiple times before a commit.  Note that this
   is not only for adding new files.  Even modified files must be
   added to the set of changes about to be committed.  The "git status"
   command gives you a summary of what is included so far for the
   next commit.  When done you should use the 'git commit' command to
   make it real.

   Note: don't forget to 'add' a file again if you modified it after the
   first 'add' and before 'commit'. Otherwise only the previous added
   state of that file will be committed. This is because git tracks
   content, so what you're really 'add'ing to the commit is the *content*
   of the file in the state it is in when you 'add' it.

2) By using 'git commit -a' directly

   This is a quick way to automatically 'add' the content from all files
   that were modified since the previous commit, and perform the actual
   commit without having to separately 'add' them beforehand.  This will
   not add content from new files i.e. files that were never added before.
   Those files still have to be added explicitly before performing a
   commit.

But here's a twist. If you do 'git commit <file1> <file2> ...' then only
the  changes belonging to those explicitly specified files will be
committed, entirely bypassing the current "added" changes. Those "added"
changes will still remain available for a subsequent commit though.

However, for normal usage you only have to remember 'git add' + 'git commit'
and/or 'git commit -a'.


Viewing the changelog
---------------------

At any point you can view the history of your changes using

------------------------------------------------
$ git log
------------------------------------------------

If you also want to see complete diffs at each step, use

------------------------------------------------
$ git log -p
------------------------------------------------

Often the overview of the change is useful to get a feel of
each step

------------------------------------------------
$ git log --stat --summary
------------------------------------------------

Managing branches
-----------------

A single git repository can maintain multiple branches of
development.  To create a new branch named "experimental", use

------------------------------------------------
$ git branch experimental
------------------------------------------------

If you now run

------------------------------------------------
$ git branch
------------------------------------------------

you'll get a list of all existing branches:

------------------------------------------------
  experimental
* master
------------------------------------------------

The "experimental" branch is the one you just created, and the
"master" branch is a default branch that was created for you
automatically.  The asterisk marks the branch you are currently on;
type

------------------------------------------------
$ git checkout experimental
------------------------------------------------

to switch to the experimental branch.  Now edit a file, commit the
change, and switch back to the master branch:

------------------------------------------------
(edit file)
$ git commit -a
$ git checkout master
------------------------------------------------

Check that the change you made is no longer visible, since it was
made on the experimental branch and you're back on the master branch.

You can make a different change on the master branch:

------------------------------------------------
(edit file)
$ git commit -a
------------------------------------------------

at this point the two branches have diverged, with different changes
made in each.  To merge the changes made in experimental into master, run

------------------------------------------------
$ git pull . experimental
------------------------------------------------

If the changes don't conflict, you're done.  If there are conflicts,
markers will be left in the problematic files showing the conflict;

------------------------------------------------
$ git diff
------------------------------------------------

will show this.  Once you've edited the files to resolve the
conflicts,

------------------------------------------------
$ git commit -a
------------------------------------------------

will commit the result of the merge. Finally,

------------------------------------------------
$ gitk
------------------------------------------------

will show a nice graphical representation of the resulting history.

At this point you could delete the experimental branch with

------------------------------------------------
$ git branch -d experimental
------------------------------------------------

This command ensures that the changes in the experimental branch are
already in the current branch.

If you develop on a branch crazy-idea, then regret it, you can always
delete the branch with

-------------------------------------
$ git branch -D crazy-idea
-------------------------------------

Branches are cheap and easy, so this is a good way to try something
out.

Using git for collaboration
---------------------------

Suppose that Alice has started a new project with a git repository in
/home/alice/project, and that Bob, who has a home directory on the
same machine, wants to contribute.

Bob begins with:

------------------------------------------------
$ git clone /home/alice/project myrepo
------------------------------------------------

This creates a new directory "myrepo" containing a clone of Alice's
repository.  The clone is on an equal footing with the original
project, possessing its own copy of the original project's history.

Bob then makes some changes and commits them:

------------------------------------------------
(edit files)
$ git commit -a
(repeat as necessary)
------------------------------------------------

When he's ready, he tells Alice to pull changes from the repository
at /home/bob/myrepo.  She does this with:

------------------------------------------------
$ cd /home/alice/project
$ git pull /home/bob/myrepo master
------------------------------------------------

This merges the changes from Bob's "master" branch into Alice's
current branch.  If Alice has made her own changes in the meantime,
then she may need to manually fix any conflicts.  (Note that the
"master" argument in the above command is actually unnecessary, as it
is the default.)

The "pull" command thus performs two operations: it fetches changes
from a remote branch, then merges them into the current branch.

You can perform the first operation alone using the "git fetch"
command.  For example, Alice could create a temporary branch just to
track Bob's changes, without merging them with her own, using:

-------------------------------------
$ git fetch /home/bob/myrepo master:bob-incoming
-------------------------------------

which fetches the changes from Bob's master branch into a new branch
named bob-incoming.  Then

-------------------------------------
$ git log -p master..bob-incoming
-------------------------------------

shows a list of all the changes that Bob made since he branched from
Alice's master branch.

After examining those changes, and possibly fixing things, Alice
could pull the changes into her master branch:

-------------------------------------
$ git checkout master
$ git pull . bob-incoming
-------------------------------------

The last command is a pull from the "bob-incoming" branch in Alice's
own repository.

Alice could also perform both steps at once with:

-------------------------------------
$ git pull /home/bob/myrepo master:bob-incoming
-------------------------------------

This is just like the "git pull /home/bob/myrepo master" that we saw
before, except that it also stores the unmerged changes from bob's
master branch in bob-incoming before merging them into Alice's
current branch.  Note that git pull always merges into the current
branch, regardless of what else is given on the commandline.

Later, Bob can update his repo with Alice's latest changes using

-------------------------------------
$ git pull
-------------------------------------

Note that he doesn't need to give the path to Alice's repository;
when Bob cloned Alice's repository, git stored the location of her
repository in the repository configuration, and that location is
used for pulls:

-------------------------------------
$ git repo-config --get remote.origin.url
/home/bob/myrepo
-------------------------------------

(The complete configuration created by git-clone is visible using
"git repo-config -l", and the gitlink:git-repo-config[1] man page
explains the meaning of each option.)

Git also keeps a pristine copy of Alice's master branch under the
name "origin/master":

-------------------------------------
$ git branch -r
  origin/master
-------------------------------------

If Bob later decides to work from a different host, he can still
perform clones and pulls using the ssh protocol:

-------------------------------------
$ git clone alice.org:/home/alice/project myrepo
-------------------------------------

Alternatively, git has a native protocol, or can use rsync or http;
see gitlink:git-pull[1] for details.

Git can also be used in a CVS-like mode, with a central repository
that various users push changes to; see gitlink:git-push[1] and
link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users].

Exploring history
-----------------

Git history is represented as a series of interrelated commits.  We
have already seen that the git log command can list those commits.
Note that first line of each git log entry also gives a name for the
commit:

-------------------------------------
$ git log
commit c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7
Author: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date:   Tue May 16 17:18:22 2006 -0700

    merge-base: Clarify the comments on post processing.
-------------------------------------

We can give this name to git show to see the details about this
commit.

-------------------------------------
$ git show c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7
-------------------------------------

But there are other ways to refer to commits.  You can use any initial
part of the name that is long enough to uniquely identify the commit:

-------------------------------------
$ git show c82a22c39c   # the first few characters of the name are
                        # usually enough
$ git show HEAD         # the tip of the current branch
$ git show experimental # the tip of the "experimental" branch
-------------------------------------

Every commit usually has one "parent" commit
which points to the previous state of the project:

-------------------------------------
$ git show HEAD^  # to see the parent of HEAD
$ git show HEAD^^ # to see the grandparent of HEAD
$ git show HEAD~4 # to see the great-great grandparent of HEAD
-------------------------------------

Note that merge commits may have more than one parent:

-------------------------------------
$ git show HEAD^1 # show the first parent of HEAD (same as HEAD^)
$ git show HEAD^2 # show the second parent of HEAD
-------------------------------------

You can also give commits names of your own; after running

-------------------------------------
$ git-tag v2.5 1b2e1d63ff
-------------------------------------

you can refer to 1b2e1d63ff by the name "v2.5".  If you intend to
share this name with other people (for example, to identify a release
version), you should create a "tag" object, and perhaps sign it; see
gitlink:git-tag[1] for details.

Any git command that needs to know a commit can take any of these
names.  For example:

-------------------------------------
$ git diff v2.5 HEAD     # compare the current HEAD to v2.5
$ git branch stable v2.5 # start a new branch named "stable" based
                         # at v2.5
$ git reset --hard HEAD^ # reset your current branch and working
                         # directory to its state at HEAD^
-------------------------------------

Be careful with that last command: in addition to losing any changes
in the working directory, it will also remove all later commits from
this branch.  If this branch is the only branch containing those
commits, they will be lost.  (Also, don't use "git reset" on a
publicly-visible branch that other developers pull from, as git will
be confused by history that disappears in this way.)

The git grep command can search for strings in any version of your
project, so

-------------------------------------
$ git grep "hello" v2.5
-------------------------------------

searches for all occurrences of "hello" in v2.5.

If you leave out the commit name, git grep will search any of the
files it manages in your current directory.  So

-------------------------------------
$ git grep "hello"
-------------------------------------

is a quick way to search just the files that are tracked by git.

Many git commands also take sets of commits, which can be specified
in a number of ways.  Here are some examples with git log:

-------------------------------------
$ git log v2.5..v2.6            # commits between v2.5 and v2.6
$ git log v2.5..                # commits since v2.5
$ git log --since="2 weeks ago" # commits from the last 2 weeks
$ git log v2.5.. Makefile       # commits since v2.5 which modify
                                # Makefile
-------------------------------------

You can also give git log a "range" of commits where the first is not
necessarily an ancestor of the second; for example, if the tips of
the branches "stable-release" and "master" diverged from a common
commit some time ago, then

-------------------------------------
$ git log stable..experimental
-------------------------------------

will list commits made in the experimental branch but not in the
stable branch, while

-------------------------------------
$ git log experimental..stable
-------------------------------------

will show the list of commits made on the stable branch but not
the experimental branch.

The "git log" command has a weakness: it must present commits in a
list.  When the history has lines of development that diverged and
then merged back together, the order in which "git log" presents
those commits is meaningless.

Most projects with multiple contributors (such as the linux kernel,
or git itself) have frequent merges, and gitk does a better job of
visualizing their history.  For example,

-------------------------------------
$ gitk --since="2 weeks ago" drivers/
-------------------------------------

allows you to browse any commits from the last 2 weeks of commits
that modified files under the "drivers" directory.  (Note: you can
adjust gitk's fonts by holding down the control key while pressing
"-" or "+".)

Finally, most commands that take filenames will optionally allow you
to precede any filename by a commit, to specify a particular version
of the file:

-------------------------------------
$ git diff v2.5:Makefile HEAD:Makefile.in
-------------------------------------

You can also use "git show" to see any such file:

-------------------------------------
$ git show v2.5:Makefile
-------------------------------------

Next Steps
----------

This tutorial should be enough to perform basic distributed revision
control for your projects.  However, to fully understand the depth
and power of git you need to understand two simple ideas on which it
is based:

  * The object database is the rather elegant system used to
    store the history of your project--files, directories, and
    commits.

  * The index file is a cache of the state of a directory tree,
    used to create commits, check out working directories, and
    hold the various trees involved in a merge.

link:tutorial-2.html[Part two of this tutorial] explains the object
database, the index file, and a few other odds and ends that you'll
need to make the most of git.

If you don't want to consider with that right away, a few other
digressions that may be interesting at this point are:

  * gitlink:git-format-patch[1], gitlink:git-am[1]: These convert
    series of git commits into emailed patches, and vice versa,
    useful for projects such as the linux kernel which rely heavily
    on emailed patches.

  * gitlink:git-bisect[1]: When there is a regression in your
    project, one way to track down the bug is by searching through
    the history to find the exact commit that's to blame.  Git bisect
    can help you perform a binary search for that commit.  It is
    smart enough to perform a close-to-optimal search even in the
    case of complex non-linear history with lots of merged branches.

  * link:everyday.html[Everyday GIT with 20 Commands Or So]

  * link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users].